The result of the discussion was delete. per this discussion and multiple prior discussions Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:07, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes ( talk) 23:42, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete, with the reasonable rationales being that the template was both unused and coded directly into Module:Multiple image. ( non-admin closure) Doug Mehus T· C 12:13, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:55, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete, with the rationale being that it was unused. ( non-admin closure) Doug Mehus T· C 12:34, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:50, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete with the rationales provided being that it consists of no links to other articles/all links contained within it are redlinks and that there are no transclusions. ( non-admin closure) Doug Mehus T· C 12:26, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
All red links, no transclusions DannyS712 ( talk) 18:11, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
unused, could be moved to project space? Frietjes ( talk) 16:29, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:04, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
There has been previous consensus to delete the main questionable template {{ Awarded Questionable}}. This template was missed in that discussion, but should be deleted as well for the same reasons. ‑‑ Trialpears ( talk) 12:27, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Soft delete. Reasonable rationale with no discussion for a long time. (non-admin closure) ‑‑ Trialpears ( talk) 08:25, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Stumbled upon this template while viewing the Template:Bread and Template:Ring and knot-shaped breads templates. It seems like it was created as a potential Wikipedia award, but there was no discussion and viewing the page properties information, it looks like no pages of transcluded this page—that is, the award's never been given. So, consider this my recommendation to decommission (delete) this Wikipedia award without prejudice to re-creating it in the future. Doug Mehus ( talk) 17:17, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ‑‑ Trialpears ( talk) 08:22, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:51, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
{{
Special:PrefixIndex/User talk:Dmehus/Archives|stripprefix=1}}
if you want it to auto-update.
* Pppery *
it has begun... 00:42, 10 November 2019 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete. per this discussion and multiple prior discussions Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:07, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes ( talk) 23:42, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete, with the reasonable rationales being that the template was both unused and coded directly into Module:Multiple image. ( non-admin closure) Doug Mehus T· C 12:13, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:55, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete, with the rationale being that it was unused. ( non-admin closure) Doug Mehus T· C 12:34, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:50, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete with the rationales provided being that it consists of no links to other articles/all links contained within it are redlinks and that there are no transclusions. ( non-admin closure) Doug Mehus T· C 12:26, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
All red links, no transclusions DannyS712 ( talk) 18:11, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
unused, could be moved to project space? Frietjes ( talk) 16:29, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:04, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
There has been previous consensus to delete the main questionable template {{ Awarded Questionable}}. This template was missed in that discussion, but should be deleted as well for the same reasons. ‑‑ Trialpears ( talk) 12:27, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Soft delete. Reasonable rationale with no discussion for a long time. (non-admin closure) ‑‑ Trialpears ( talk) 08:25, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Stumbled upon this template while viewing the Template:Bread and Template:Ring and knot-shaped breads templates. It seems like it was created as a potential Wikipedia award, but there was no discussion and viewing the page properties information, it looks like no pages of transcluded this page—that is, the award's never been given. So, consider this my recommendation to decommission (delete) this Wikipedia award without prejudice to re-creating it in the future. Doug Mehus ( talk) 17:17, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ‑‑ Trialpears ( talk) 08:22, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:51, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
{{
Special:PrefixIndex/User talk:Dmehus/Archives|stripprefix=1}}
if you want it to auto-update.
* Pppery *
it has begun... 00:42, 10 November 2019 (UTC)