The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:05, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Navbox with just two links. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:52, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete - FASTILY 02:07, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
s-line data modules
|
---|
|
{{ S-line}} templates for Caltrain. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Caltrain. All transclusions replaced. There are four dependent s-line data modules which should also be deleted. Mackensen (talk) 21:18, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:59, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Per WP:TFD#REASONS, 3 - The templates are not used after Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 138#RfC about marking the Featured portals process as "historical". Guilherme Burn ( talk) 16:51, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Per WP:TFD#REASONS, 3 - The template is not used. Redundant with Template:Portal information sidebar Guilherme Burn ( talk) 16:39, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:54, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Per WP:TFD#REASONS, 3 - The templates are not used in any portals. Only used is Template:Portal navbar no header2 Guilherme Burn ( talk) 16:23, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Already deleted by Fastily. (non-admin closure) -- Trialpears ( talk) 15:13, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
unused Frietjes ( talk) 14:12, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:User OTRS. (non-admin closure) -- Trialpears ( talk) 15:16, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:User wikipedia/OTRSAccess with
Template:User OTRS.
practically the same.. with only logo different.
Viztor (
talk)
13:01, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:29, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
recently tagged for deletion by the author. not a serious title. list of champions are in the main article. Frietjes ( talk) 12:51, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete - FASTILY 02:07, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
{{ S-line}} templates for Bay Area Rapid Transit. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/BART. All transclusions replaced. There are 24 dependent s-line data modules which should also be deleted. Mackensen (talk) 12:05, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 03:23, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Unused Hddty. ( talk) 01:13, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:10, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Single use template. The contents can easily be added to the article Hierarchy of the Catholic Church The Banner talk 10:44, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:56, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Replace and delete
Province or territory of Canada-specific wrapper for {{ Infobox settlement}}, with limited transclusions ( 13!), on pretty stable sets of articles. Subst:itution will reduce the maintenance overhead, reduce the cognitive burden for editors, and enable articles to benefit more immediately from improvements to the current parent template.
Note: Despite being named "Infobox settlement" the template is not only used for settlements. Per its documentation, Infobox settlement is "used to produce an Infobox for human settlements (cities, towns, villages, communities) as well as other administrative districts, counties, provinces, et cetera—in fact, any subdivision below the level of a country"
.
Cf. Wikipedia:List_of_infoboxes/Geography_and_place#Place 77.11.163.184 ( talk) 00:00, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
I fail to see this maintenance issue per the template's sparse editing history- If you failed, why you voted Keep? If new features are implemented in the infobox that is wrapped by the one in discussion, namely {{ Infobox settlement}}, then they might be needed to be implemented in the wrapper too. Thus, a "sparse editing history" could also be a proof that nobody is implementing new features here. 78.54.200.249 ( talk) 13:14, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Like Knowledgekid87 I don't see what the problem is- then why did you vote? 78.54.200.249 ( talk) 13:14, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
77.11.201.49 ( talk) 12:31, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Infobox usage on articles about places in Canada |
TerraCyprus ( talk) 19:26, 13 July 2019 (UTC) // TerraCyprus, in the caption I changed "Austria" to "Canada". 78.55.133.168 ( talk) 17:46, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
78.54.117.60 ( talk) 19:50, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
77.11.201.49 ( talk) 12:12, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
graphics about the situations in other geographic areas and similar unrelated points[4] seems to have no substance, since the documentation for {{ Infobox settlement}} has:
It should be used to produce an Infobox for human settlements (cities, towns, villages, communities) as well as other administrative districts, counties, provinces, et cetera—in fact, any subdivision below the level of a country, for which {{Infobox country}} should be used." - which has no restriction on the geographical context and there is also no single rule that general design decisions should no be applied to items related to Canada.
please do not rapidly change your IP address if you are able to control it, it makes it very difficult to contact you. I realize that you may not have control over it[7] . A bit weird that Ivanvector is now turning the content discussion into a fight against me. 77.11.201.49 ( talk) 14:45, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
JJMC89 could you have a look at this one? 77.11.201.49 ( talk) 14:54, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Side discussion about wikicode
|
---|
|
{{infobox|child=yes}}
in articles which is what I am currently seeing in
the sandbox.
Frietjes (
talk)
14:31, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
{{infobox|child=yes}}
in templates, I have a problem with {{infobox|child=yes}}
in articles directly.
Frietjes (
talk)
18:51, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:08, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Not everything needs a navbox. Only 10 entries out of 36 have articles. – Muboshgu ( talk) 16:15, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:07, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
A trivial template that fails WP:NAVBOX guidelines; basically nobody has actually accepted this prize, it's solely the pronouncements of one insignificant group. Only transcluded on one page now (disclaimer: after I removed it from some of the "winners"). Originally created by a now-banned editor. See also Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2019_June_21#Category:Confucius_Peace_Prize . SnowFire ( talk) 21:28, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:WikiProject Australia. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:26, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
According to Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian law, users are supposed to use {{ WikiProject Australia|law=yes}} to assess articles. Therefore, this template serves no technical purpose.
It's currently existing uses could potentially be served by making this a wrapper, but I would say the safest bet is just to make it a redirect to {{WikiProject Australia}} as to avoid the redundancy. – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 19:48, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:05, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Navbox with just two links. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:52, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete - FASTILY 02:07, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
s-line data modules
|
---|
|
{{ S-line}} templates for Caltrain. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Caltrain. All transclusions replaced. There are four dependent s-line data modules which should also be deleted. Mackensen (talk) 21:18, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:59, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Per WP:TFD#REASONS, 3 - The templates are not used after Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 138#RfC about marking the Featured portals process as "historical". Guilherme Burn ( talk) 16:51, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Per WP:TFD#REASONS, 3 - The template is not used. Redundant with Template:Portal information sidebar Guilherme Burn ( talk) 16:39, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:54, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Per WP:TFD#REASONS, 3 - The templates are not used in any portals. Only used is Template:Portal navbar no header2 Guilherme Burn ( talk) 16:23, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Already deleted by Fastily. (non-admin closure) -- Trialpears ( talk) 15:13, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
unused Frietjes ( talk) 14:12, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:User OTRS. (non-admin closure) -- Trialpears ( talk) 15:16, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:User wikipedia/OTRSAccess with
Template:User OTRS.
practically the same.. with only logo different.
Viztor (
talk)
13:01, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:29, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
recently tagged for deletion by the author. not a serious title. list of champions are in the main article. Frietjes ( talk) 12:51, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete - FASTILY 02:07, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
{{ S-line}} templates for Bay Area Rapid Transit. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/BART. All transclusions replaced. There are 24 dependent s-line data modules which should also be deleted. Mackensen (talk) 12:05, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 03:23, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Unused Hddty. ( talk) 01:13, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:10, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Single use template. The contents can easily be added to the article Hierarchy of the Catholic Church The Banner talk 10:44, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:56, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Replace and delete
Province or territory of Canada-specific wrapper for {{ Infobox settlement}}, with limited transclusions ( 13!), on pretty stable sets of articles. Subst:itution will reduce the maintenance overhead, reduce the cognitive burden for editors, and enable articles to benefit more immediately from improvements to the current parent template.
Note: Despite being named "Infobox settlement" the template is not only used for settlements. Per its documentation, Infobox settlement is "used to produce an Infobox for human settlements (cities, towns, villages, communities) as well as other administrative districts, counties, provinces, et cetera—in fact, any subdivision below the level of a country"
.
Cf. Wikipedia:List_of_infoboxes/Geography_and_place#Place 77.11.163.184 ( talk) 00:00, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
I fail to see this maintenance issue per the template's sparse editing history- If you failed, why you voted Keep? If new features are implemented in the infobox that is wrapped by the one in discussion, namely {{ Infobox settlement}}, then they might be needed to be implemented in the wrapper too. Thus, a "sparse editing history" could also be a proof that nobody is implementing new features here. 78.54.200.249 ( talk) 13:14, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Like Knowledgekid87 I don't see what the problem is- then why did you vote? 78.54.200.249 ( talk) 13:14, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
77.11.201.49 ( talk) 12:31, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Infobox usage on articles about places in Canada |
TerraCyprus ( talk) 19:26, 13 July 2019 (UTC) // TerraCyprus, in the caption I changed "Austria" to "Canada". 78.55.133.168 ( talk) 17:46, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
78.54.117.60 ( talk) 19:50, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
77.11.201.49 ( talk) 12:12, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
graphics about the situations in other geographic areas and similar unrelated points[4] seems to have no substance, since the documentation for {{ Infobox settlement}} has:
It should be used to produce an Infobox for human settlements (cities, towns, villages, communities) as well as other administrative districts, counties, provinces, et cetera—in fact, any subdivision below the level of a country, for which {{Infobox country}} should be used." - which has no restriction on the geographical context and there is also no single rule that general design decisions should no be applied to items related to Canada.
please do not rapidly change your IP address if you are able to control it, it makes it very difficult to contact you. I realize that you may not have control over it[7] . A bit weird that Ivanvector is now turning the content discussion into a fight against me. 77.11.201.49 ( talk) 14:45, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
JJMC89 could you have a look at this one? 77.11.201.49 ( talk) 14:54, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Side discussion about wikicode
|
---|
|
{{infobox|child=yes}}
in articles which is what I am currently seeing in
the sandbox.
Frietjes (
talk)
14:31, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
{{infobox|child=yes}}
in templates, I have a problem with {{infobox|child=yes}}
in articles directly.
Frietjes (
talk)
18:51, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:08, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Not everything needs a navbox. Only 10 entries out of 36 have articles. – Muboshgu ( talk) 16:15, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:07, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
A trivial template that fails WP:NAVBOX guidelines; basically nobody has actually accepted this prize, it's solely the pronouncements of one insignificant group. Only transcluded on one page now (disclaimer: after I removed it from some of the "winners"). Originally created by a now-banned editor. See also Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2019_June_21#Category:Confucius_Peace_Prize . SnowFire ( talk) 21:28, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:WikiProject Australia. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:26, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
According to Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian law, users are supposed to use {{ WikiProject Australia|law=yes}} to assess articles. Therefore, this template serves no technical purpose.
It's currently existing uses could potentially be served by making this a wrapper, but I would say the safest bet is just to make it a redirect to {{WikiProject Australia}} as to avoid the redundancy. – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 19:48, 7 July 2019 (UTC)