The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs ( talk) 18:46, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
This template creates disambiguated links to railway station articles in the format Name (Service station)
. This convention was generally used in North American articles, and deprecated by the
WP:USSTATION guideline. Every link this template creates at present is a redirect. The template could be modified to use the format Name station (Service)
, but as articles are no longer preemptively disambiguated this will probably lead to broken links or further redirects. There are better alternatives such as {{
station link}} or the various system-specific templates enumerated in this templates' documentation.
Mackensen
(talk) 23:59, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 00:47, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Rochester Subway. All transclusions replaced. Mackensen (talk) 23:50, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 22:48, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Unused and no place to even place it. 1994 Italian general election does not list the elections per region and 1994 Italian general election in Sicily does not exist. Gonnym ( talk) 13:46, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 22:48, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Unused template. The article 2006 Italian general election uses so many other tables that I'm not sure where this could even fit. Gonnym ( talk) 13:40, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 22:48, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Unused template. The article 2006 Italian general election#Main coalitions and parties uses a different table for the coalition parties. Gonnym ( talk) 13:39, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 22:48, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Unused template. The article 2006 Italian general election#Main coalitions and parties uses a different table for the coalition parties. Gonnym ( talk) 13:38, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 22:47, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Unused template but also very badly created. This doesn't just list the 2006 election results, but also previous election results which makes this very hard to understand. Gonnym ( talk) 13:33, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. The main concerns are that it is not accurate and that the scope might need changing. Neither of these necessitates deletion of the template. If the concerns raised here are not addressed following discussion (or it's determined that this template really isn't needed), then there is NPASR. Primefac ( talk) 20:35, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
This template has multiple inaccuracies. I think it should be deleted because there are other places like this one that show the same thing. Mstrojny ( talk) 23:08, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Reaper Eternal ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
As noted in the documentation, this template was mostly used by {{
sec link}}, {{
sec link auto}} and {{
sec link image}} which were deleted. At
Template talk:Case preserving encode it was brought up by
User:Anomie that it can be replaced by {{urlencode:{{{1|}}}|wiki}}
. Its only usage left is at
Template:Template sandbox notice, which can be replaced by the code above.
Gonnym (
talk) 10:35, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
{{
G7}}
as best I can. All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough, 15:11, 19 April 2019 (UTC).The result of the discussion was merge to Template:BillboardURLbyName. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 16:09, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:BillboardURL with
Template:BillboardURLbyName.
{{
BillboardURL}} has been deprecated in favor of {{
BillboardURLbyName}}. All remaining transclusions should be converted to the proper template.
Gonnym (
talk) 09:24, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
I have wrapped the TfM notice at {{
BillboardURLbyName}}
because that notice breaks cs1|2 citations when this template is used in |url=
. Edit: same done to {{
BillboardURL}}
.
—
Trappist the monk (
talk) 14:26, 19 April 2019 (UTC) 14:34, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Primefac ( talk) 20:32, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
I don't think character maps like this should even exist. The reason of connecting the different remakes of the same film should be solved by a navbox. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:26, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Primefac ( talk) 20:32, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
If one intends to connect the various remakes of the same film, creating a character map is not the solution. Rather, one could consider creating a navbox. This film already has that. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:33, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox given name. Well, the IPs certainly come from the same place and their arguments have a similar wording. And their arguments are not very strong. So consensus in favour of merge as noted by the non-IP accounts Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 16:13, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Infobox surname with
Template:Infobox given name.
Much overlapping variables, and for a reason. In fact in many if not in most cases historically and internationally, a surname is or was a given name. It might be time to finally merge this?
PPEMES (
talk) 11:22, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 May 6. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:17, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 May 6. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:17, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Template is now used, but there is NPASR if a different reason is provided. Primefac ( talk) 20:28, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox with numerous WP:REDLINKS Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 21:38, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. A broader discussion about this sort of template may be in order, but as it is now used (and that was the main reason for the nomination) there is NPASR if different reasons are provided. Primefac ( talk) 20:27, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox with mostly plainlinks ( WP:EXISTING) Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 21:42, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 May 26. Primefac ( talk) 14:18, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 May 15. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:48, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. NPASR if it's still unused after a few weeks. Primefac ( talk) 20:22, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Unused and overly-broad navbox. WP:NENAN Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 16:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 22:46, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Only one directly-related article ( Ai no Uta (Strawberry Flower song)); offers no additional navigational benefit. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 02:08, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 22:45, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
This band's navigational template consists of the band's articles, three albums that redirect to the band's article and a record label. The band's article is the only article where the template is located, so the navigational template navigates nowhere and WP:NENAN. Aspects ( talk) 01:20, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs ( talk) 18:46, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
This template creates disambiguated links to railway station articles in the format Name (Service station)
. This convention was generally used in North American articles, and deprecated by the
WP:USSTATION guideline. Every link this template creates at present is a redirect. The template could be modified to use the format Name station (Service)
, but as articles are no longer preemptively disambiguated this will probably lead to broken links or further redirects. There are better alternatives such as {{
station link}} or the various system-specific templates enumerated in this templates' documentation.
Mackensen
(talk) 23:59, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 00:47, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Rochester Subway. All transclusions replaced. Mackensen (talk) 23:50, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 22:48, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Unused and no place to even place it. 1994 Italian general election does not list the elections per region and 1994 Italian general election in Sicily does not exist. Gonnym ( talk) 13:46, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 22:48, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Unused template. The article 2006 Italian general election uses so many other tables that I'm not sure where this could even fit. Gonnym ( talk) 13:40, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 22:48, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Unused template. The article 2006 Italian general election#Main coalitions and parties uses a different table for the coalition parties. Gonnym ( talk) 13:39, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 22:48, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Unused template. The article 2006 Italian general election#Main coalitions and parties uses a different table for the coalition parties. Gonnym ( talk) 13:38, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 22:47, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Unused template but also very badly created. This doesn't just list the 2006 election results, but also previous election results which makes this very hard to understand. Gonnym ( talk) 13:33, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. The main concerns are that it is not accurate and that the scope might need changing. Neither of these necessitates deletion of the template. If the concerns raised here are not addressed following discussion (or it's determined that this template really isn't needed), then there is NPASR. Primefac ( talk) 20:35, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
This template has multiple inaccuracies. I think it should be deleted because there are other places like this one that show the same thing. Mstrojny ( talk) 23:08, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Reaper Eternal ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
As noted in the documentation, this template was mostly used by {{
sec link}}, {{
sec link auto}} and {{
sec link image}} which were deleted. At
Template talk:Case preserving encode it was brought up by
User:Anomie that it can be replaced by {{urlencode:{{{1|}}}|wiki}}
. Its only usage left is at
Template:Template sandbox notice, which can be replaced by the code above.
Gonnym (
talk) 10:35, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
{{
G7}}
as best I can. All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough, 15:11, 19 April 2019 (UTC).The result of the discussion was merge to Template:BillboardURLbyName. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 16:09, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:BillboardURL with
Template:BillboardURLbyName.
{{
BillboardURL}} has been deprecated in favor of {{
BillboardURLbyName}}. All remaining transclusions should be converted to the proper template.
Gonnym (
talk) 09:24, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
I have wrapped the TfM notice at {{
BillboardURLbyName}}
because that notice breaks cs1|2 citations when this template is used in |url=
. Edit: same done to {{
BillboardURL}}
.
—
Trappist the monk (
talk) 14:26, 19 April 2019 (UTC) 14:34, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Primefac ( talk) 20:32, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
I don't think character maps like this should even exist. The reason of connecting the different remakes of the same film should be solved by a navbox. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:26, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Primefac ( talk) 20:32, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
If one intends to connect the various remakes of the same film, creating a character map is not the solution. Rather, one could consider creating a navbox. This film already has that. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:33, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox given name. Well, the IPs certainly come from the same place and their arguments have a similar wording. And their arguments are not very strong. So consensus in favour of merge as noted by the non-IP accounts Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 16:13, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Infobox surname with
Template:Infobox given name.
Much overlapping variables, and for a reason. In fact in many if not in most cases historically and internationally, a surname is or was a given name. It might be time to finally merge this?
PPEMES (
talk) 11:22, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 May 6. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:17, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 May 6. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:17, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Template is now used, but there is NPASR if a different reason is provided. Primefac ( talk) 20:28, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox with numerous WP:REDLINKS Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 21:38, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. A broader discussion about this sort of template may be in order, but as it is now used (and that was the main reason for the nomination) there is NPASR if different reasons are provided. Primefac ( talk) 20:27, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox with mostly plainlinks ( WP:EXISTING) Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 21:42, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 May 26. Primefac ( talk) 14:18, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 May 15. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:48, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. NPASR if it's still unused after a few weeks. Primefac ( talk) 20:22, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Unused and overly-broad navbox. WP:NENAN Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 16:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 22:46, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Only one directly-related article ( Ai no Uta (Strawberry Flower song)); offers no additional navigational benefit. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 02:08, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 22:45, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
This band's navigational template consists of the band's articles, three albums that redirect to the band's article and a record label. The band's article is the only article where the template is located, so the navigational template navigates nowhere and WP:NENAN. Aspects ( talk) 01:20, 19 April 2019 (UTC)