The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was no consensus.
Plastikspork―Œ(talk) 00:27, 17 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Insufficient navigation and in general unneeded for a junior-level competition. Most entries are non-articles, and unlikely to become such. Has been previously deleted here:
2016 Tfd. --
K.e.coffman (
talk) 02:29, 8 September 2018 (UTC)reply
keep, part of
a series, unless you are suggesting we delete all of them, in which case I would say delete. this is probably the reason why it was recreated.
Frietjes (
talk) 13:35, 9 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Primefac (
talk) 03:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Redundant to using {{PAGESINCAT:All portals}}; and, as a template that requires manual updates, it is always likely to be outdated (at the time of nomination it shows 1517 while the PAGESINCAT count shows 1754). See also discussion at
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Portals/Design#Template:Number_of_portals. Evad37[
talk 07:05, 21 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Galobtter (
pingó mió) 09:57, 31 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment The template could just have it's contents changed to use PAGESINCAT instead of a static number. Although, since the template is not very widely used, that syntax could be used directly in the transcluding pages instead, allowing for deletion. — AfroThundr (
u ·
t ·
c) 02:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete after substituting with PAGESINCAT as described by nominator. Upon reviewing the discussions, I agree this recommendation is compelling. --
Bsherr (
talk) 07:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep and implement the change mentioned by AfroThundr3007730. —
Godsy (
TALKCONT) 18:31, 4 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Plastikspork―Œ(talk) 01:22, 8 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete There is no reason to abstract a simple call to PAGESINCAT in a template.
{{3x|p}}ery (
talk) 01:32, 8 September 2018 (UTC)reply
delete, not needed.
Frietjes (
talk) 13:34, 9 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Kayne West album track list templates
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was no consensus.
Plastikspork―Œ(talk) 00:27, 17 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Insufficient navigation and in general unneeded for a junior-level competition. Most entries are non-articles, and unlikely to become such. Has been previously deleted here:
2016 Tfd. --
K.e.coffman (
talk) 02:29, 8 September 2018 (UTC)reply
keep, part of
a series, unless you are suggesting we delete all of them, in which case I would say delete. this is probably the reason why it was recreated.
Frietjes (
talk) 13:35, 9 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Primefac (
talk) 03:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Redundant to using {{PAGESINCAT:All portals}}; and, as a template that requires manual updates, it is always likely to be outdated (at the time of nomination it shows 1517 while the PAGESINCAT count shows 1754). See also discussion at
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Portals/Design#Template:Number_of_portals. Evad37[
talk 07:05, 21 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Galobtter (
pingó mió) 09:57, 31 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment The template could just have it's contents changed to use PAGESINCAT instead of a static number. Although, since the template is not very widely used, that syntax could be used directly in the transcluding pages instead, allowing for deletion. — AfroThundr (
u ·
t ·
c) 02:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete after substituting with PAGESINCAT as described by nominator. Upon reviewing the discussions, I agree this recommendation is compelling. --
Bsherr (
talk) 07:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep and implement the change mentioned by AfroThundr3007730. —
Godsy (
TALKCONT) 18:31, 4 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Plastikspork―Œ(talk) 01:22, 8 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete There is no reason to abstract a simple call to PAGESINCAT in a template.
{{3x|p}}ery (
talk) 01:32, 8 September 2018 (UTC)reply
delete, not needed.
Frietjes (
talk) 13:34, 9 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Kayne West album track list templates
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).