The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac ( talk) 04:01, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
One link doesn't warrant a navbox. Pkbwcgs ( talk) 19:35, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac ( talk) 04:02, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Unused and this template won't ever be used because the MedCom has shut down so there is no point marking this template as "historical". Pkbwcgs ( talk) 18:40, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac ( talk) 04:02, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Unused and the MedCom has shut so this template won't ever be used. Pkbwcgs ( talk) 18:36, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge the respective years to a single table. As mentioned in the discussion, there is attribution to consider so please ensure that all appropriate {{ copied}} tags and other attribution is given, and redirects are left in place. Primefac ( talk) 12:14, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:2018 China League Two North table,
Template:2018 China League Two South table and
Template:2018 China League Two Overall table to
Template:2018 China League Two tables.
Propose merging
Template:2019 China League Two North table,
Template:2019 China League Two South table and
Template:2019 China League Two Overall table to
Template:2019 China League Two tables.
Why not use one template instead of three by using {{
Multiple sports table preview}} like
Template:2019 AFC Asian Cup group tables? Here is an example:
Template:2019 China League Two tables .
Hhkohh (
talk)
15:03, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac ( talk) 00:54, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
However, I now realize that it doesn't have any useful function. We have no reason to create banner templates announcing why an article is at the title it's at; the rationales for a title here vary widely, case-by-case, and are recorded in WP:RM discussions. The template's quasi-purpose, even after cleanup, is therefore entirely redundant. There does not appear to be a single analogue of this template anywhere else on Wikipedia, not even for things that actually are internationally and near-universally accepted standards (which the IOC bird list is not), such as various ISO and ITU, etc. standards. It's just not something we do, much less need banner tags about. The closest thing I can think of is Template:IUPAC spelling, but it's very different: it's instructing editors to use a particular spelling system when writing that article, so it does serve an encyclopedic, editorial function. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 18:28, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete for multiple reasons:
AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
unused after I replaced them in Georgia's 11th congressional district where they were causing formatting problems. Frietjes ( talk) 19:22, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Galobtter ( pingó mió) 06:59, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Yet another bloated esports template featuring tons of non-notable entries that fails its sole purpose of navigation. ~ Dissident93 ( talk) 06:00, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Galobtter ( pingó mió) 13:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Yet another bloated esports template featuring tons of non-notable entries that fails its sole purpose of navigation. ~ Dissident93 ( talk) 05:59, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac ( talk) 04:01, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
One link doesn't warrant a navbox. Pkbwcgs ( talk) 19:35, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac ( talk) 04:02, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Unused and this template won't ever be used because the MedCom has shut down so there is no point marking this template as "historical". Pkbwcgs ( talk) 18:40, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac ( talk) 04:02, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Unused and the MedCom has shut so this template won't ever be used. Pkbwcgs ( talk) 18:36, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge the respective years to a single table. As mentioned in the discussion, there is attribution to consider so please ensure that all appropriate {{ copied}} tags and other attribution is given, and redirects are left in place. Primefac ( talk) 12:14, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:2018 China League Two North table,
Template:2018 China League Two South table and
Template:2018 China League Two Overall table to
Template:2018 China League Two tables.
Propose merging
Template:2019 China League Two North table,
Template:2019 China League Two South table and
Template:2019 China League Two Overall table to
Template:2019 China League Two tables.
Why not use one template instead of three by using {{
Multiple sports table preview}} like
Template:2019 AFC Asian Cup group tables? Here is an example:
Template:2019 China League Two tables .
Hhkohh (
talk)
15:03, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac ( talk) 00:54, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
However, I now realize that it doesn't have any useful function. We have no reason to create banner templates announcing why an article is at the title it's at; the rationales for a title here vary widely, case-by-case, and are recorded in WP:RM discussions. The template's quasi-purpose, even after cleanup, is therefore entirely redundant. There does not appear to be a single analogue of this template anywhere else on Wikipedia, not even for things that actually are internationally and near-universally accepted standards (which the IOC bird list is not), such as various ISO and ITU, etc. standards. It's just not something we do, much less need banner tags about. The closest thing I can think of is Template:IUPAC spelling, but it's very different: it's instructing editors to use a particular spelling system when writing that article, so it does serve an encyclopedic, editorial function. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 18:28, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete for multiple reasons:
AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
unused after I replaced them in Georgia's 11th congressional district where they were causing formatting problems. Frietjes ( talk) 19:22, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Galobtter ( pingó mió) 06:59, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Yet another bloated esports template featuring tons of non-notable entries that fails its sole purpose of navigation. ~ Dissident93 ( talk) 06:00, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Galobtter ( pingó mió) 13:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Yet another bloated esports template featuring tons of non-notable entries that fails its sole purpose of navigation. ~ Dissident93 ( talk) 05:59, 14 November 2018 (UTC)