The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
@
Pppery: This module dates back to the first days of Scribunto and I haven't used it much since, and it doesn't seem to have any substantive use at the moment anywhere outside of archives. However, I'm reluctant to have code put out of sight in the admin-only bin, not just in this case but as an overall rule. Would it be possible for us to agree to simply move the page to
Module:User:Wnt/Sandbox/DisplayLuaTableContents, under my existing sandboxes? Someday I mean to refresh my Lua writing but something always seems to come up. (usually bad, nowadays...)
Wnt (
talk)
01:34, 7 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Oh. My
Module:User:Wnt/Sandbox predates this standard, so I should probably move it. ;) OK, I've moved it and the other sandbox subpages (now
Module:Sandbox/Wnt etc). Probably broke some old code in the box but if it matters I can figure it out someday. I'll move this TfD item the same way if it's OK, but because this discussion is open I thought I should ask first.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Delete. Description doesn't do anything that can't be done just as well by basic Wikitext without any template is however untrue: the margin of the <dd> is 0 in this template. Which I generally don't support as it is inconsistent with user expectation. --
Izno (
talk)
13:49, 7 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Delete -- Looks like an aborted article in template space. It might even reasonably be a test article and CSDable as such, but I won't mark it up since it would be an edge case. --
Izno (
talk)
13:50, 7 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
@
Pppery: This module dates back to the first days of Scribunto and I haven't used it much since, and it doesn't seem to have any substantive use at the moment anywhere outside of archives. However, I'm reluctant to have code put out of sight in the admin-only bin, not just in this case but as an overall rule. Would it be possible for us to agree to simply move the page to
Module:User:Wnt/Sandbox/DisplayLuaTableContents, under my existing sandboxes? Someday I mean to refresh my Lua writing but something always seems to come up. (usually bad, nowadays...)
Wnt (
talk)
01:34, 7 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Oh. My
Module:User:Wnt/Sandbox predates this standard, so I should probably move it. ;) OK, I've moved it and the other sandbox subpages (now
Module:Sandbox/Wnt etc). Probably broke some old code in the box but if it matters I can figure it out someday. I'll move this TfD item the same way if it's OK, but because this discussion is open I thought I should ask first.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Delete. Description doesn't do anything that can't be done just as well by basic Wikitext without any template is however untrue: the margin of the <dd> is 0 in this template. Which I generally don't support as it is inconsistent with user expectation. --
Izno (
talk)
13:49, 7 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Delete -- Looks like an aborted article in template space. It might even reasonably be a test article and CSDable as such, but I won't mark it up since it would be an edge case. --
Izno (
talk)
13:50, 7 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).