The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged Blades Godric 07:34, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Not enough articles. 2 of the 5 bluelinks are redirects, and the 3 articles are the same as those in Category:Astatine compounds. Very little is known about the chemistry of astatine since there are no long-lived isotopes. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 04:37, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete.
(non-admin closure)
~ Winged Blades
Godric 07:34, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Close overturned; the result of the discussion was no consensus.
Primefac (
talk)
15:25, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Not a suitable topic for a navbox. They are not intrinsically linked to each other other than where they came from. Best left for categories. Imagine if we had a {{ People of New York}} navbox, etc, etc... -- wooden superman 10:20, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:White House press corps. I do note that there are other types of correspondents than just TV, so if a name change is needed to clarify I see no issue with that. Primefac ( talk) 02:08, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:ABCWH with
Template:White House press corps.
Propose merging
Template:CBSWH with
Template:White House press corps.
Propose merging
Template:CNNWH with
Template:White House press corps.
Propose merging
Template:NBCWH with
Template:White House press corps.
These could all be merged to a single {{
White House press corps}} navbox, which could include journalists not affiliated to a network. (see article
White House press corps). Although, is this even a suitable topic for a navbox? Maybe the navboxes should be deleted and let the article and a category do the job... --
wooden
superman
11:52, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. The rationale(s) forwarded, in favor of deletion, outweighs that of the opposite camp. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged Blades Godric 07:31, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Classic WP:NENAN. This is category material at most, and even there some of these categories and categorization is questionable. The corresponding lists at the baseball park article are largely unsourced and essay-like, so as the basis of navboxes it is exceedingly inappropriate. oknazevad ( talk) 10:43, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac ( talk) 01:51, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Result of an election still to come. But this is about a part of that election, not the general results or a separate election. With all candidates mentioned and most of them annotated, it looks more like an election poster. The Banner talk 03:25, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged Blades Godric 07:34, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Not enough articles. 2 of the 5 bluelinks are redirects, and the 3 articles are the same as those in Category:Astatine compounds. Very little is known about the chemistry of astatine since there are no long-lived isotopes. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 04:37, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete.
(non-admin closure)
~ Winged Blades
Godric 07:34, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Close overturned; the result of the discussion was no consensus.
Primefac (
talk)
15:25, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Not a suitable topic for a navbox. They are not intrinsically linked to each other other than where they came from. Best left for categories. Imagine if we had a {{ People of New York}} navbox, etc, etc... -- wooden superman 10:20, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:White House press corps. I do note that there are other types of correspondents than just TV, so if a name change is needed to clarify I see no issue with that. Primefac ( talk) 02:08, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:ABCWH with
Template:White House press corps.
Propose merging
Template:CBSWH with
Template:White House press corps.
Propose merging
Template:CNNWH with
Template:White House press corps.
Propose merging
Template:NBCWH with
Template:White House press corps.
These could all be merged to a single {{
White House press corps}} navbox, which could include journalists not affiliated to a network. (see article
White House press corps). Although, is this even a suitable topic for a navbox? Maybe the navboxes should be deleted and let the article and a category do the job... --
wooden
superman
11:52, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. The rationale(s) forwarded, in favor of deletion, outweighs that of the opposite camp. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged Blades Godric 07:31, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Classic WP:NENAN. This is category material at most, and even there some of these categories and categorization is questionable. The corresponding lists at the baseball park article are largely unsourced and essay-like, so as the basis of navboxes it is exceedingly inappropriate. oknazevad ( talk) 10:43, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac ( talk) 01:51, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Result of an election still to come. But this is about a part of that election, not the general results or a separate election. With all candidates mentioned and most of them annotated, it looks more like an election poster. The Banner talk 03:25, 28 April 2018 (UTC)