This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2018 March 16. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged Blades Godric 07:21, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
It may not directly violate any guideline, but I see it as too overly massive with anything related to the realm of game music being dumped in here, including software used. It should be split into two more manageable parts, if not just deleted outright. ~ Dissident93 ( talk) 21:47, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 March 15. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged Blades Godric 07:19, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) feminist ( talk) 04:56, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Not enough links to warrant a navbox. -- wooden superman 13:55, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was convert to list article. Because these three templates aren't terribly large by themselves, I am recommending this be done with two steps. First, each template will be moved to the article space. Second, the contents be converted to a list article at List of human cell types derived from the germ layers giving proper attribution. These steps can happen in either order and the articles turned into redirects when it is complete. An optional third phase, which I will likely perform via bot run, will be to add the new article to the "see also" section of the pages where the template(s) were removed. Primefac ( talk) 15:52, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
These three templates serve no useful navigation purpose, and only contribute to navbox clutter. They depict articles formed from one of three common embryological cells lines.
This format is more appropriately portrayed in a list - I propose a move to three list articles of the same names as the templates. This has the additional benefit of being able to provide contextual information and being able to link to said lists appropriately. Tom (LT) ( talk) 22:15, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 March 15. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged Blades Godric 07:20, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2018 March 16. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged Blades Godric 07:21, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
It may not directly violate any guideline, but I see it as too overly massive with anything related to the realm of game music being dumped in here, including software used. It should be split into two more manageable parts, if not just deleted outright. ~ Dissident93 ( talk) 21:47, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 March 15. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged Blades Godric 07:19, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) feminist ( talk) 04:56, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Not enough links to warrant a navbox. -- wooden superman 13:55, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was convert to list article. Because these three templates aren't terribly large by themselves, I am recommending this be done with two steps. First, each template will be moved to the article space. Second, the contents be converted to a list article at List of human cell types derived from the germ layers giving proper attribution. These steps can happen in either order and the articles turned into redirects when it is complete. An optional third phase, which I will likely perform via bot run, will be to add the new article to the "see also" section of the pages where the template(s) were removed. Primefac ( talk) 15:52, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
These three templates serve no useful navigation purpose, and only contribute to navbox clutter. They depict articles formed from one of three common embryological cells lines.
This format is more appropriately portrayed in a list - I propose a move to three list articles of the same names as the templates. This has the additional benefit of being able to provide contextual information and being able to link to said lists appropriately. Tom (LT) ( talk) 22:15, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 March 15. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged Blades Godric 07:20, 15 March 2018 (UTC)