From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 3

Infobox settlement wrappers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 December 11. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 05:21, 11 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:This is a new usher

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted as G2 by User:MelanieN.   PorkchopGMX ( Sign your posts with four tildes!) 00:26, 4 December 2018 (UTC) reply

This was created by User:Brockscollege19 who made the template then put the template on their userpage. Not sure why this was created in template space. PorkchopGMX ( Sign your posts with four tildes!) 18:30, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply

I have speedy deleted it as a test page. It is clear from the edit summary that they created this as a template by mistake, thinking it was their user page. -- MelanieN ( talk) 23:41, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Roman Lob

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 05:03, 11 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Not enough links to warrant a navbox. WP:NENAN -- wooden superman 16:30, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply

  • delete, the articles are already well-connected. Frietjes ( talk) 19:49, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per above comment and nom.-- Tom (LT) ( talk) 00:15, 4 December 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Terrible Things

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 05:09, 11 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Only one member and one album, not enough to warrant a navbox. The rest are all just related and semi-related bands. -- wooden superman 16:29, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply

  • delete, the three articles are already well-connected. Frietjes ( talk) 19:49, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per above comment and nom.-- Tom (LT) ( talk) 00:15, 4 December 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox India state administration

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 05:09, 11 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Only three transclusions, all for the same state. {{ Infobox Indian state government}} is available, if needed. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:12, 17 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pkbwcgs ( talk) 11:21, 25 November 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pkbwcgs ( talk) 16:20, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Merge (or subst/delete) per nom.-- Tom (LT) ( talk) 00:12, 4 December 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OVO Sound

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 05:11, 11 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Not enough links to warrant a navbox. -- wooden superman 16:00, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cool Air

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 December 11. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 05:20, 11 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Greek letter templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 December 11. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 13:17, 11 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:You are here

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 05:31, 11 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Unused outside of a user sandbox, and is an inherent misrepresentation of established policy because it appears to be intended solely as part of a map or guide.  —  Mr. Guye ( talk) ( contribs)  03:22, 25 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Comment – This template was inspired by similar discussion templates and was created for use in a talk page discussion. This templated was never intended for use in main space hence map or guide does not apply. I replaced this template with the contents of the template in its only transclusion. Hence the template is no longer needed. Boghog ( talk) 05:43, 25 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac ( talk) 01:19, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Alpha Phi Omega National Presidents

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. The navbox has been converted to a list for each article; doesn't appear to be any objection to deletion otherwise. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 07:54, 13 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Very few live links. Not very useful as a navigational aid. -- wooden superman 14:13, 16 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Original Author here. Any suggestions on the best way to fold it into the page? Note, when it was originally created, there was no separate Alpha Phi Omega (Philippines) page, so the information should probably be split for the specific country. Naraht ( talk) 14:21, 16 November 2018 (UTC) reply
Maybe as lists under the respective country subheadings at Alpha Phi Omega#Organization? -- wooden superman 14:29, 16 November 2018 (UTC) reply
Probably. I'll take a look, but it may not be today. Also, I moved all of the National President pages into one category. It appears that some of the other ones which haven't been brought up have even fewer links than Alpha Phi Omega's 2. Could you take a look at all nine of the pages? Naraht ( talk) 14:32, 16 November 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter ( pingó mió) 07:12, 24 November 2018 (UTC) reply
Perhaps a format like this section Alpha_Kappa_Alpha#International_Presidents on each page would be useful. originalmess how u doin that busta rhyme? 12:15, 26 November 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac ( talk) 00:54, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Un-botfill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete as G7 Primefac ( talk) 01:12, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Unused, typically subst, Image information should not be being done by "blind" robots anyway. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 00:19, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infosplit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:05, 11 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Deprecated, and incompatible with Commons. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 00:18, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NFUR not needed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 December 13. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 07:40, 13 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Split media

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:05, 11 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Created initally when there was a backlog of clashing files, as this has now been considerably reduced, placing images in the associated category should probably be done using a bot rather than a manually placed template. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 00:15, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Media by uploader

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 December 13. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 07:41, 13 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:No-date

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 December 13. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 07:42, 13 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uw-notself1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete as G7. Primefac ( talk) 01:11, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Unused as subst, Nomination as covered by other templates relating to uploading images not in compliance with image poilcy. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 00:07, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Img-claimed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 December 13. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 07:42, 13 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Img-unclaimed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 December 13. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 07:43, 13 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bsr-old

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:05, 11 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Only used on two images, Experimental, and so could be removed without major issues. I am wondering if all this does is postpone the F4 nominations, rather than actually remove it. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 00:03, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 3

Infobox settlement wrappers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 December 11. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 05:21, 11 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:This is a new usher

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted as G2 by User:MelanieN.   PorkchopGMX ( Sign your posts with four tildes!) 00:26, 4 December 2018 (UTC) reply

This was created by User:Brockscollege19 who made the template then put the template on their userpage. Not sure why this was created in template space. PorkchopGMX ( Sign your posts with four tildes!) 18:30, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply

I have speedy deleted it as a test page. It is clear from the edit summary that they created this as a template by mistake, thinking it was their user page. -- MelanieN ( talk) 23:41, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Roman Lob

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 05:03, 11 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Not enough links to warrant a navbox. WP:NENAN -- wooden superman 16:30, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply

  • delete, the articles are already well-connected. Frietjes ( talk) 19:49, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per above comment and nom.-- Tom (LT) ( talk) 00:15, 4 December 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Terrible Things

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 05:09, 11 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Only one member and one album, not enough to warrant a navbox. The rest are all just related and semi-related bands. -- wooden superman 16:29, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply

  • delete, the three articles are already well-connected. Frietjes ( talk) 19:49, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per above comment and nom.-- Tom (LT) ( talk) 00:15, 4 December 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox India state administration

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 05:09, 11 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Only three transclusions, all for the same state. {{ Infobox Indian state government}} is available, if needed. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:12, 17 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pkbwcgs ( talk) 11:21, 25 November 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pkbwcgs ( talk) 16:20, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Merge (or subst/delete) per nom.-- Tom (LT) ( talk) 00:12, 4 December 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OVO Sound

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 05:11, 11 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Not enough links to warrant a navbox. -- wooden superman 16:00, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cool Air

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 December 11. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 05:20, 11 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Greek letter templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 December 11. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 13:17, 11 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:You are here

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 05:31, 11 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Unused outside of a user sandbox, and is an inherent misrepresentation of established policy because it appears to be intended solely as part of a map or guide.  —  Mr. Guye ( talk) ( contribs)  03:22, 25 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Comment – This template was inspired by similar discussion templates and was created for use in a talk page discussion. This templated was never intended for use in main space hence map or guide does not apply. I replaced this template with the contents of the template in its only transclusion. Hence the template is no longer needed. Boghog ( talk) 05:43, 25 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac ( talk) 01:19, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Alpha Phi Omega National Presidents

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. The navbox has been converted to a list for each article; doesn't appear to be any objection to deletion otherwise. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 07:54, 13 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Very few live links. Not very useful as a navigational aid. -- wooden superman 14:13, 16 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Original Author here. Any suggestions on the best way to fold it into the page? Note, when it was originally created, there was no separate Alpha Phi Omega (Philippines) page, so the information should probably be split for the specific country. Naraht ( talk) 14:21, 16 November 2018 (UTC) reply
Maybe as lists under the respective country subheadings at Alpha Phi Omega#Organization? -- wooden superman 14:29, 16 November 2018 (UTC) reply
Probably. I'll take a look, but it may not be today. Also, I moved all of the National President pages into one category. It appears that some of the other ones which haven't been brought up have even fewer links than Alpha Phi Omega's 2. Could you take a look at all nine of the pages? Naraht ( talk) 14:32, 16 November 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter ( pingó mió) 07:12, 24 November 2018 (UTC) reply
Perhaps a format like this section Alpha_Kappa_Alpha#International_Presidents on each page would be useful. originalmess how u doin that busta rhyme? 12:15, 26 November 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac ( talk) 00:54, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Un-botfill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete as G7 Primefac ( talk) 01:12, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Unused, typically subst, Image information should not be being done by "blind" robots anyway. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 00:19, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infosplit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:05, 11 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Deprecated, and incompatible with Commons. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 00:18, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NFUR not needed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 December 13. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 07:40, 13 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Split media

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:05, 11 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Created initally when there was a backlog of clashing files, as this has now been considerably reduced, placing images in the associated category should probably be done using a bot rather than a manually placed template. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 00:15, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Media by uploader

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 December 13. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 07:41, 13 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:No-date

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 December 13. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 07:42, 13 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uw-notself1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete as G7. Primefac ( talk) 01:11, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Unused as subst, Nomination as covered by other templates relating to uploading images not in compliance with image poilcy. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 00:07, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Img-claimed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 December 13. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 07:42, 13 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Img-unclaimed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 December 13. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 07:43, 13 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bsr-old

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:05, 11 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Only used on two images, Experimental, and so could be removed without major issues. I am wondering if all this does is postpone the F4 nominations, rather than actually remove it. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 00:03, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook