The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 2. (non-admin closure) Galobtter ( pingó mió) 09:04, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Galobtter ( pingó mió) 12:47, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
The
BIG3, a fledgling
3x3 basketball league, has consistently been considered non-defining for bios, with previous discussions
here and
here being that's the league is not worth mentioning in either the opening sentence or in infoboxes. As such, this is unnecessary per
WP:TCREEP, which also states: "Just because a template can be created doesn't automatically mean that it should be.
" —
Bagumba (
talk)
08:03, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 2. (non-admin closure) Galobtter ( pingó mió) 09:09, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 2. (non-admin closure) Galobtter ( pingó mió) 09:09, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Galobtter ( pingó mió) 12:49, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
This navbox is for a French rugby union team, but now have a vast majority of red links (with just 2 blue links at present), and as RC Narbonne no longer participate in a fully professional rugby union competition, current or new players won't automatically be deemed notable as per WikiProject Rugby union/Notability criteria. TheMightyPeanut ( talk) 01:45, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. A bit of a WP:TRAINWRECK, with different criteria such as having a parent article, combining with another navbox to link more than 3 articles, or total links, red or blue, being more than 3, being suggested for for keeping some of the navboxes. No prejudice to speedily renominating a subset of these (non-admin closure) Galobtter ( pingó mió) 09:23, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
All of these templates violate WP:EXISTING and link three or less existing articles. -- Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 05:59, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Green. Primefac ( talk) 20:20, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Substantially duplicates {{ tq}} for no obvious reason pertinent to Wikipedia. Izno ( talk) 14:54, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
{{tq|gt=y}}
or something), since I think the added punctuation mark would help with accessibility. It's also a well-known convention from the earlier days of email. I don't feel very strongly about this, though.
Enterprisey (
talk!)
23:43, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac ( talk) 02:03, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Very few (if any) of these articles actually relate directly to the Syrian opposition, instead just link to general Syria articles. -- wooden superman 10:31, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 2. (non-admin closure) Galobtter ( pingó mió) 09:04, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Galobtter ( pingó mió) 12:47, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
The
BIG3, a fledgling
3x3 basketball league, has consistently been considered non-defining for bios, with previous discussions
here and
here being that's the league is not worth mentioning in either the opening sentence or in infoboxes. As such, this is unnecessary per
WP:TCREEP, which also states: "Just because a template can be created doesn't automatically mean that it should be.
" —
Bagumba (
talk)
08:03, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 2. (non-admin closure) Galobtter ( pingó mió) 09:09, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 2. (non-admin closure) Galobtter ( pingó mió) 09:09, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Galobtter ( pingó mió) 12:49, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
This navbox is for a French rugby union team, but now have a vast majority of red links (with just 2 blue links at present), and as RC Narbonne no longer participate in a fully professional rugby union competition, current or new players won't automatically be deemed notable as per WikiProject Rugby union/Notability criteria. TheMightyPeanut ( talk) 01:45, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. A bit of a WP:TRAINWRECK, with different criteria such as having a parent article, combining with another navbox to link more than 3 articles, or total links, red or blue, being more than 3, being suggested for for keeping some of the navboxes. No prejudice to speedily renominating a subset of these (non-admin closure) Galobtter ( pingó mió) 09:23, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
All of these templates violate WP:EXISTING and link three or less existing articles. -- Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 05:59, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Green. Primefac ( talk) 20:20, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Substantially duplicates {{ tq}} for no obvious reason pertinent to Wikipedia. Izno ( talk) 14:54, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
{{tq|gt=y}}
or something), since I think the added punctuation mark would help with accessibility. It's also a well-known convention from the earlier days of email. I don't feel very strongly about this, though.
Enterprisey (
talk!)
23:43, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac ( talk) 02:03, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Very few (if any) of these articles actually relate directly to the Syrian opposition, instead just link to general Syria articles. -- wooden superman 10:31, 26 July 2018 (UTC)