The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:01, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
({{ PRC admin/ref sgc}} intentionally excluded, though it maybe should be deleted for a different reason) Totally overcomplicated system for storing data, which is in net used on only one article. Ppp ery 23:21, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac ( talk) 01:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Unused template that is nothing but redlinks Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. WP:NPASR. Primefac ( talk) 01:30, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
This doesn't really do much other than add <sup>
to {{
NYCS SSI}}. It's only directly used in {{
NYCS time 2}} AFAIK.
Jc86035 (
talk)
12:08, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
<sup>
. It is mentioned directly using template syntax on only
these five pages. It is not used on any of the discussion pages since all mentions are inside <nowiki>
, which leaves {{
NYCS time 2}} and its sandbox, where it can be replaced by <sup>{{NYCS SSI|{{{1}}}|text={{{text}}}}}</sup>
.
Jc86035 (
talk)
08:38, 10 September 2017 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac ( talk) 01:27, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Unused template. entirely red links except for 3 which all link to the same page. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 17:27, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge. (non-admin closure) J 947( c) ( m) 03:31, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Infobox royal house with
Template:Infobox noble house.
A few weeks ago it was decided to merge {{
Infobox noble house}} with {{
infobox family}}. Unfortunately, it seems only one person who is actually familiar with the usage of {{
Infobox noble house}} commented. I'd like to counterpropose the obvious merge of these two instead - they are nearly identical and could much, much more easily be merged. The templates for Houses of Nobility and Royalty are nearly identical and their subjects overlap, and many times I have seen articles on noble houses using the {{
infobox royal house}} instead. The majority of their fields are of no use on {{
infobox family}} and vice versa, and this merge would just cause confusion (who is the "current head" of the
Kennedy family? What is the "current region" of the House of Romanov?). While the subjects might seem to be the same, the templates do not actually correspond with each other. Merging noble house/family templates is going to create a lot of work for someone when the same purpose could much more easily be accomplished by merging it with Royal House.
—Мандичка
YO 😜
22:30, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Already deleted? Primefac ( talk) 01:27, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
old, non-notable roster Frietjes ( talk) 14:17, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:01, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
({{ PRC admin/ref sgc}} intentionally excluded, though it maybe should be deleted for a different reason) Totally overcomplicated system for storing data, which is in net used on only one article. Ppp ery 23:21, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac ( talk) 01:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Unused template that is nothing but redlinks Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. WP:NPASR. Primefac ( talk) 01:30, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
This doesn't really do much other than add <sup>
to {{
NYCS SSI}}. It's only directly used in {{
NYCS time 2}} AFAIK.
Jc86035 (
talk)
12:08, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
<sup>
. It is mentioned directly using template syntax on only
these five pages. It is not used on any of the discussion pages since all mentions are inside <nowiki>
, which leaves {{
NYCS time 2}} and its sandbox, where it can be replaced by <sup>{{NYCS SSI|{{{1}}}|text={{{text}}}}}</sup>
.
Jc86035 (
talk)
08:38, 10 September 2017 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac ( talk) 01:27, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Unused template. entirely red links except for 3 which all link to the same page. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 17:27, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge. (non-admin closure) J 947( c) ( m) 03:31, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Infobox royal house with
Template:Infobox noble house.
A few weeks ago it was decided to merge {{
Infobox noble house}} with {{
infobox family}}. Unfortunately, it seems only one person who is actually familiar with the usage of {{
Infobox noble house}} commented. I'd like to counterpropose the obvious merge of these two instead - they are nearly identical and could much, much more easily be merged. The templates for Houses of Nobility and Royalty are nearly identical and their subjects overlap, and many times I have seen articles on noble houses using the {{
infobox royal house}} instead. The majority of their fields are of no use on {{
infobox family}} and vice versa, and this merge would just cause confusion (who is the "current head" of the
Kennedy family? What is the "current region" of the House of Romanov?). While the subjects might seem to be the same, the templates do not actually correspond with each other. Merging noble house/family templates is going to create a lot of work for someone when the same purpose could much more easily be accomplished by merging it with Royal House.
—Мандичка
YO 😜
22:30, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Already deleted? Primefac ( talk) 01:27, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
old, non-notable roster Frietjes ( talk) 14:17, 22 September 2017 (UTC)