- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:FIBA roster header1. No opposition. Primefac ( talk) 15:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Template:FIBA-Europe roster header ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:FIBA roster header1 ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging
Template:FIBA-Europe roster header with
Template:FIBA roster header1.
both templates do the same thing. one is older and the other is more frequently used. we should merge the two, preserving any history where possible.
Frietjes (
talk)
21:09, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac ( talk) 19:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete. WP:G6. NeilN talk to me 16:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Daily Observer ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
This actually isn't even really a template, so far as I can tell. It's just a link being used to a source which is currently being used in only one article, Srinjoy Mukherjee. John Carter ( talk) 16:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac ( talk) 15:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Better suited by a category, and scope is too obscure for a navbox. Also see past Valdosta precedent, since confirmed here, here, here, and here, here, and here, and here. Rs chen 7754 07:46, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete—per precedent and the obscurity of the topic. Imzadi 1979 → 17:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Per past precedent. Dough 4872 20:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - Aside from the disturbing trend of deleting useful navboxes, I don't know if anybody here is aware of this, but categories are impossible to access from mobile versions of Wikipedia. ---------
User:DanTD (
talk)
02:30, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- User:DanTD, lol, so are navboxes, try viewing this. Frietjes ( talk) 14:10, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- delete, per precedent. Frietjes ( talk) 14:10, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:FIBA roster header1. No opposition. Primefac ( talk) 15:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Template:FIBA-Europe roster header ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:FIBA roster header1 ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging
Template:FIBA-Europe roster header with
Template:FIBA roster header1.
both templates do the same thing. one is older and the other is more frequently used. we should merge the two, preserving any history where possible.
Frietjes (
talk)
21:09, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac ( talk) 19:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete. WP:G6. NeilN talk to me 16:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Daily Observer ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
This actually isn't even really a template, so far as I can tell. It's just a link being used to a source which is currently being used in only one article, Srinjoy Mukherjee. John Carter ( talk) 16:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac ( talk) 15:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Better suited by a category, and scope is too obscure for a navbox. Also see past Valdosta precedent, since confirmed here, here, here, and here, here, and here, and here. Rs chen 7754 07:46, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete—per precedent and the obscurity of the topic. Imzadi 1979 → 17:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Per past precedent. Dough 4872 20:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - Aside from the disturbing trend of deleting useful navboxes, I don't know if anybody here is aware of this, but categories are impossible to access from mobile versions of Wikipedia. ---------
User:DanTD (
talk)
02:30, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- User:DanTD, lol, so are navboxes, try viewing this. Frietjes ( talk) 14:10, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- delete, per precedent. Frietjes ( talk) 14:10, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).