February 1
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Relisted on
2017 February 10
Primefac (
talk)
00:25, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Relisted on
2017 February 10
Primefac (
talk)
00:25, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Primefac (
talk)
13:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons.
FASTILY
02:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here.
Frietjes (
talk)
13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Primefac (
talk)
13:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons.
FASTILY
02:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here.
Frietjes (
talk)
13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Primefac (
talk)
13:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons.
FASTILY
02:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here.
Frietjes (
talk)
13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Primefac (
talk)
13:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons.
FASTILY
02:11, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here.
Frietjes (
talk)
13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Primefac (
talk)
13:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons.
FASTILY
02:11, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here.
Frietjes (
talk)
13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Primefac (
talk)
13:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons.
FASTILY
02:11, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here.
Frietjes (
talk)
13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Primefac (
talk)
13:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons.
FASTILY
02:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Primefac (
talk)
13:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons.
FASTILY
02:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here.
Frietjes (
talk)
13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Primefac (
talk)
13:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons.
FASTILY
02:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here.
Frietjes (
talk)
13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Primefac (
talk)
13:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons.
FASTILY
02:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here.
Frietjes (
talk)
13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Primefac (
talk)
13:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons.
FASTILY
02:09, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here.
Frietjes (
talk)
13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Primefac (
talk)
13:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons.
FASTILY
02:09, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here.
Frietjes (
talk)
13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Primefac (
talk)
13:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons.
FASTILY
02:09, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here.
Frietjes (
talk)
13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Primefac (
talk)
13:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons.
FASTILY
02:09, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here.
Frietjes (
talk)
13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Primefac (
talk)
13:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons.
FASTILY
02:08, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete and per my comment above. Not used and belongs on commons; would have been better if batch nominated; we can't just speculatively create said PD templates unless they are used under the names of every political entity that has existed just in case it is used. --Tom (LT) 00:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here.
Frietjes (
talk)
13:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).