The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac ( talk) 15:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
redundant to using {{
2TeamBracket-Tennis3}} with |RD1=Challenge Round
. I replaced it in the half dozen transcluding articles.
Frietjes (
talk)
22:42, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 April 22 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:08, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac ( talk) 15:23, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Most of these properties listed have been divested. Once pruned, there will be too many red links or non-linked contents to justify the continued presence of a navbox for this company. ViperSnake151 Talk 15:41, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac ( talk) 15:20, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Once you remove the crew per WP:PERFNAV, and all the tangential articles not directly related to CBS's coverage of the Olympics, you are left with this version which is not worthy of a navbox. Rob Sinden ( talk) 10:39, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 April 22 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:08, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. Normally after three TFDs there would be a moratorium on future renominations, but if the outcome of any future RFC/discussion determines that Amazon should not be used then a renomination is perfectly acceptable. Primefac ( talk) 15:19, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
This template exists in order to facilitate links to sales pages on Amazon. That's a terrible idea. First, people should be using ISBNs because that way the book can also be found at libraries. Second, it gives preferential treatment to a vendor, which we should not do.
Consensus last time this was discussed was "keep for now", with variations on "we should not really be doing this". We now have over 50,000 links to Amazon on Wikipedia, of which over a thousand are provided through this template. It's time to start fixing that. Guy ( Help!) 07:24, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac ( talk) 15:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
redundant to using {{
2TeamBracket-Tennis3}} with |RD1=Challenge Round
. I replaced it in the half dozen transcluding articles.
Frietjes (
talk)
22:42, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 April 22 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:08, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac ( talk) 15:23, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Most of these properties listed have been divested. Once pruned, there will be too many red links or non-linked contents to justify the continued presence of a navbox for this company. ViperSnake151 Talk 15:41, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac ( talk) 15:20, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Once you remove the crew per WP:PERFNAV, and all the tangential articles not directly related to CBS's coverage of the Olympics, you are left with this version which is not worthy of a navbox. Rob Sinden ( talk) 10:39, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 April 22 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:08, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. Normally after three TFDs there would be a moratorium on future renominations, but if the outcome of any future RFC/discussion determines that Amazon should not be used then a renomination is perfectly acceptable. Primefac ( talk) 15:19, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
This template exists in order to facilitate links to sales pages on Amazon. That's a terrible idea. First, people should be using ISBNs because that way the book can also be found at libraries. Second, it gives preferential treatment to a vendor, which we should not do.
Consensus last time this was discussed was "keep for now", with variations on "we should not really be doing this". We now have over 50,000 links to Amazon on Wikipedia, of which over a thousand are provided through this template. It's time to start fixing that. Guy ( Help!) 07:24, 13 April 2017 (UTC)