The result of the discussion was relisted on 2016 July 8. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:12, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relist to July 7. Primefac ( talk) 03:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
The class is covered in the template Destroyers of the Indian Navy. I think there is no need of separate single line template for just five ships. KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 12:29, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relist to July 7. Primefac ( talk) 03:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
The class is covered in the template Destroyers of the Indian Navy. I think there is no need of separate template for just three ships. KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 12:14, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relist to July 7. Primefac ( talk) 03:51, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
The class is covered in the template Destroyers of the Indian Navy. I think there is no need of separate template for just three ships. KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 12:13, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:22, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
This navbox does not contain any links that the main article does not already contain, and thus does not serve any useful purpose. Even if all the redlinks were turned blue, they could easily be incorporated into the infobox. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 05:15, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2016 July 8. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:14, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2016 July 8. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:12, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relist to July 7. Primefac ( talk) 03:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
The class is covered in the template Destroyers of the Indian Navy. I think there is no need of separate single line template for just five ships. KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 12:29, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relist to July 7. Primefac ( talk) 03:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
The class is covered in the template Destroyers of the Indian Navy. I think there is no need of separate template for just three ships. KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 12:14, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relist to July 7. Primefac ( talk) 03:51, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
The class is covered in the template Destroyers of the Indian Navy. I think there is no need of separate template for just three ships. KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 12:13, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:22, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
This navbox does not contain any links that the main article does not already contain, and thus does not serve any useful purpose. Even if all the redlinks were turned blue, they could easily be incorporated into the infobox. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 05:15, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2016 July 8. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:14, 8 July 2016 (UTC)