The result of the discussion was delete {{ Chapters in the Gospel of John}} and merge {{ Content of John}}. The latter template will need to be retained due to the attribution requirements of a merge. It can be redirected to the article and tagged with {{ R with history}} ~ Rob13 Talk 23:55, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
These templates are redundant, their content being already contained in the better designed Template:Gospel of John. Jujutsuan (Please notify with {{ re}} | talk | contribs) 09:35, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Those arguing for deletion argued that these navboxes grouped articles by a non-defining characteristic, whereas those arguing for keeping argued WP:NOTDEF only applies to categories and readers may want to navigate between these articles. Both categories and navigation boxes serve the same purpose (to "group articles" as per WP:CLT). Categories are a much less invasive way of linking to articles, as navboxes take up valuable real estate on the article page itself, so it stands to reason that navboxes should be about a more strongly associated group than a category. This is more-or-less written into our guidelines at WP:NAVBOX, where criteria 3 and 5 appear highly relevant. Those criteria grant significant weight to the arguments for deletion; they're the navbox equivalent of NOTDEF. Based on strength of arguments, there's consensus to delete. ~ Rob13 Talk 15:13, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
—Delete. The templates do not address a navigable topic. As with similar categorisation, the property listed in each is not defining. (For that reason there also is no navbox "Element names starting with an A"). Any such etymology is well covered in List of elements. DePiep ( talk) 15:00, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep both and do not merge. (non-admin closure) Primefac ( talk) 03:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:New Jersey school district spending table with
Template:Infobox school district.
I found this as an ill formed proposal. Because it makes sense, at first glance at least, I fixed it. The proposal was explained at
Template_talk:New_Jersey_school_district_spending_table.
Debresser (
talk)
17:13, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge the "backend" as described by Crissov if possible by converting the table to use a module. This will not be listed at WP:TFD/H since this isn't really a "normal" outcome for a TfD and such editing is highly specialized; I leave it to participants to do it if they're interested or recruit a capable module editor. There's clear consensus for a merge of the backend, but no obvious consensus for an overall merge. No prejudice against bringing this back to TfD after the backend merge is completed. ~ Rob13 Talk 00:10, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Dates for Easter with
Template:Table of dates of Easter.
I found this as an ill formed proposal. Because it makes sense, at first glance at least, I fixed it. In addition, the second template includes more information, so this could be turned into a redirect. Both templates are in use on 2-3 articles in all.
Debresser (
talk)
17:24, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge. ~ Rob13 Talk 00:12, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:WikiProject Temperature extremes with
Template:WikiProject Meteorology.
This template should be deleted in favor of using a larger
Template:WikiProject Meteorology to include the sub-project. This template at
Category talk:2009 heat waves for example puts pages into the NA category instead of the cat category that's used at the Meterology project. Rather than keep multiple separate templates that operate differently for the same project, better to have the project use a single template with the sub-project included.
Ricky81682 (
talk)
00:53, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was move to a subpage. If you would still like to see it deleted, feel free to send it to MFD. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:51, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Pending changes table (expanded) with
Template:Pending changes blocks.
Both templates appear to do the same thing (other than naming and coloring differences).
Pppery (
talk)
13:45, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:49, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Unused license tag, seems redundant to {{
PD-CAGov}}
FASTILY
11:02, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 05:11, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to navigate Yellow Dingo (talk) 00:13, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete {{ Chapters in the Gospel of John}} and merge {{ Content of John}}. The latter template will need to be retained due to the attribution requirements of a merge. It can be redirected to the article and tagged with {{ R with history}} ~ Rob13 Talk 23:55, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
These templates are redundant, their content being already contained in the better designed Template:Gospel of John. Jujutsuan (Please notify with {{ re}} | talk | contribs) 09:35, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Those arguing for deletion argued that these navboxes grouped articles by a non-defining characteristic, whereas those arguing for keeping argued WP:NOTDEF only applies to categories and readers may want to navigate between these articles. Both categories and navigation boxes serve the same purpose (to "group articles" as per WP:CLT). Categories are a much less invasive way of linking to articles, as navboxes take up valuable real estate on the article page itself, so it stands to reason that navboxes should be about a more strongly associated group than a category. This is more-or-less written into our guidelines at WP:NAVBOX, where criteria 3 and 5 appear highly relevant. Those criteria grant significant weight to the arguments for deletion; they're the navbox equivalent of NOTDEF. Based on strength of arguments, there's consensus to delete. ~ Rob13 Talk 15:13, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
—Delete. The templates do not address a navigable topic. As with similar categorisation, the property listed in each is not defining. (For that reason there also is no navbox "Element names starting with an A"). Any such etymology is well covered in List of elements. DePiep ( talk) 15:00, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep both and do not merge. (non-admin closure) Primefac ( talk) 03:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:New Jersey school district spending table with
Template:Infobox school district.
I found this as an ill formed proposal. Because it makes sense, at first glance at least, I fixed it. The proposal was explained at
Template_talk:New_Jersey_school_district_spending_table.
Debresser (
talk)
17:13, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge the "backend" as described by Crissov if possible by converting the table to use a module. This will not be listed at WP:TFD/H since this isn't really a "normal" outcome for a TfD and such editing is highly specialized; I leave it to participants to do it if they're interested or recruit a capable module editor. There's clear consensus for a merge of the backend, but no obvious consensus for an overall merge. No prejudice against bringing this back to TfD after the backend merge is completed. ~ Rob13 Talk 00:10, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Dates for Easter with
Template:Table of dates of Easter.
I found this as an ill formed proposal. Because it makes sense, at first glance at least, I fixed it. In addition, the second template includes more information, so this could be turned into a redirect. Both templates are in use on 2-3 articles in all.
Debresser (
talk)
17:24, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge. ~ Rob13 Talk 00:12, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:WikiProject Temperature extremes with
Template:WikiProject Meteorology.
This template should be deleted in favor of using a larger
Template:WikiProject Meteorology to include the sub-project. This template at
Category talk:2009 heat waves for example puts pages into the NA category instead of the cat category that's used at the Meterology project. Rather than keep multiple separate templates that operate differently for the same project, better to have the project use a single template with the sub-project included.
Ricky81682 (
talk)
00:53, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was move to a subpage. If you would still like to see it deleted, feel free to send it to MFD. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:51, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Pending changes table (expanded) with
Template:Pending changes blocks.
Both templates appear to do the same thing (other than naming and coloring differences).
Pppery (
talk)
13:45, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:49, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Unused license tag, seems redundant to {{
PD-CAGov}}
FASTILY
11:02, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 05:11, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to navigate Yellow Dingo (talk) 00:13, 8 July 2016 (UTC)