The result of the discussion was merge and redirect to preserve attribution. ~ Rob13 Talk 05:02, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
these image galleries were being used in only one article ( Architecture of Karnataka), so I merged them with the article. Frietjes ( talk) 23:52, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2016 August 23. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:23, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:24, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Site-specific DOI template; redundant to {{ doi}}. Only two translcsuions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:58, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:25, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Non-functioning. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:55, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:24, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Single-use; wraps a link to the non-functioning {{ metavisualizer}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:50, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Keep (non-admin closure) Primefac ( talk) 19:53, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Pointless URL template, with no text content. 179 transclusions.
Typical use: [{{DoD detainees ARB|ARB_Transcript_Set_3_769-943_FINAL.pdf}} Summarized transcript (.pdf)]
Should be Subst:, then deleted.
(TfD template would break instances like that above, and so has been "noincluded".) Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:06, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13 Talk 05:00, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Unused and unusable deletion discussion templates. These templates seem to be designed for use in some hypothetical world where CfD used the AfD system (of one subpage per category discussed). Such a system is not in use. It appears that such a system was briefly proposed and accepted but quickly overturned in 2008. Pppery ( talk) 18:35, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:03, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
unused. Frietjes ( talk) 14:35, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:12, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
single use, should be merged with the article. Frietjes ( talk) 14:12, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:50, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
unused. Frietjes ( talk) 14:06, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac ( talk) 20:10, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
We don't have cast and crew in navboxes per longstanding consensus. A navbox just detailing performers in a reality TV show is just an extension of the same principle. Navboxes like this just encourage WP:TEMPLATECREEP and put WP:UNDUE weight on certain performances of an entertainer over others. For the same reason we have the guideline WP:PERFCAT for categories. Rob Sinden ( talk) 08:18, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. The consensus here favors deletion, which happens to also match the long-running overall community consensus that is repeatedly found at TfD. While the arguments used in establishing the longstanding consensus here, they typically include WP:NAVBOX (which suggests using navboxes only where readers would want to navigate from any one article to each of the other articles), WP:BIDIRECTIONAL (as the cast articles almost certainly shouldn't all have a navbox for every show/movie they've participated in), and the sentiments behind WP:TEMPLATECREEP. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:41, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
We don't have cast and crew in navboxes per longstanding consensus. A navbox just detailing performers in a reality TV show is just an extension of the same principle. Navboxes like this just encourage WP:TEMPLATECREEP and put WP:UNDUE weight on certain performances of an entertainer over others. For the same reason we have the guideline WP:PERFCAT for categories. Rob Sinden ( talk) 08:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. WP:REFUND into userspace applies for anyone seeking to create a bridge-only navbox, although there's no guarantee that won't swiftly find its way back to TfD. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:54, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
WP:NENAN. This is better suited by a category, especially as many of the express lanes don't and shouldn't have their own article, and the list will keep growing as HOT lanes become more popular in California. Rs chen 7754 03:31, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge and redirect to preserve attribution. ~ Rob13 Talk 05:02, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
these image galleries were being used in only one article ( Architecture of Karnataka), so I merged them with the article. Frietjes ( talk) 23:52, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2016 August 23. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:23, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:24, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Site-specific DOI template; redundant to {{ doi}}. Only two translcsuions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:58, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:25, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Non-functioning. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:55, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:24, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Single-use; wraps a link to the non-functioning {{ metavisualizer}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:50, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Keep (non-admin closure) Primefac ( talk) 19:53, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Pointless URL template, with no text content. 179 transclusions.
Typical use: [{{DoD detainees ARB|ARB_Transcript_Set_3_769-943_FINAL.pdf}} Summarized transcript (.pdf)]
Should be Subst:, then deleted.
(TfD template would break instances like that above, and so has been "noincluded".) Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:06, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13 Talk 05:00, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Unused and unusable deletion discussion templates. These templates seem to be designed for use in some hypothetical world where CfD used the AfD system (of one subpage per category discussed). Such a system is not in use. It appears that such a system was briefly proposed and accepted but quickly overturned in 2008. Pppery ( talk) 18:35, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:03, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
unused. Frietjes ( talk) 14:35, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:12, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
single use, should be merged with the article. Frietjes ( talk) 14:12, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:50, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
unused. Frietjes ( talk) 14:06, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac ( talk) 20:10, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
We don't have cast and crew in navboxes per longstanding consensus. A navbox just detailing performers in a reality TV show is just an extension of the same principle. Navboxes like this just encourage WP:TEMPLATECREEP and put WP:UNDUE weight on certain performances of an entertainer over others. For the same reason we have the guideline WP:PERFCAT for categories. Rob Sinden ( talk) 08:18, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. The consensus here favors deletion, which happens to also match the long-running overall community consensus that is repeatedly found at TfD. While the arguments used in establishing the longstanding consensus here, they typically include WP:NAVBOX (which suggests using navboxes only where readers would want to navigate from any one article to each of the other articles), WP:BIDIRECTIONAL (as the cast articles almost certainly shouldn't all have a navbox for every show/movie they've participated in), and the sentiments behind WP:TEMPLATECREEP. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:41, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
We don't have cast and crew in navboxes per longstanding consensus. A navbox just detailing performers in a reality TV show is just an extension of the same principle. Navboxes like this just encourage WP:TEMPLATECREEP and put WP:UNDUE weight on certain performances of an entertainer over others. For the same reason we have the guideline WP:PERFCAT for categories. Rob Sinden ( talk) 08:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. WP:REFUND into userspace applies for anyone seeking to create a bridge-only navbox, although there's no guarantee that won't swiftly find its way back to TfD. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:54, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
WP:NENAN. This is better suited by a category, especially as many of the express lanes don't and shouldn't have their own article, and the list will keep growing as HOT lanes become more popular in California. Rs chen 7754 03:31, 11 August 2016 (UTC)