The result of the discussion was delete. (nac) Alakzi ( talk) 14:47, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Note:
Template:Cuba Squad 2012 Caribbean Cup has been retained, because three out of seven participants herein stated that championship-winning squads should be retained. While deletion discussion closures are not based upon a vote count, there is no consensus herein for Template:Cuba Squad 2012 Caribbean Cup to be deleted.
North America
1000
17:50, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: Upon further consideration, Template:Cuba squad 2012 Caribbean Cup has been deleted, per the fact that one user stated that they were "and indifferent for the rest" regarding the championship winning squads, and per another user stating "Delete non-champion roster templates per Frietjes' comment above", which implies, but does not directly state that the "per" !vote is also indifferent toward the championship winning squads. North America 1000 14:03, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Consensus is that we should only create squad templates for major tournaments like the World Cup, Confederations Cup, UEFA Euro, Gold Cup, etc. The Caribbean Cup is not a major tournament. – Michael ( talk) 22:38, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. Nakon 23:37, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused, deprecated template. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 22:11, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Opabinia regalis ( talk) 07:05, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
This could be interpreted as a
WP:POVFORK, attempting to treat "historic Lancashire" as a separate, parallel entity to "
Lancashire", which is against
WP:UKCOUNTIES guidelines. The template is somewhat confusing in that it is mixing modern-day elements within the ceremonial county boundaries with elements within the historic county boundaries. And it is cherry-picking Lancashire-related topics to support a particular POV. We already have a {{
Lancashire}}
template. There has been a brief discussion about this at
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography § County Palatine of Lancaster.
Dr Greg
talk
19:50, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
Historical Lancashire is a separate, parallel entity to ceremonial Lancashire in the UK. If the WP:UKCOUNTIES guidelines recognizes both as being the same, the guidelines are incorrect with need for a review. 2.217.52.199 ( talk) 13:28, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge. (nac) Alakzi ( talk) 19:00, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Infobox SMS station with
Template:Infobox station.
The first template seems to be redundant as the second one can be used to represent the same information. It can also be used to improve the representation of the information and also creates a uniformity between different transit systems in South Korea (ie with Korail stations and metro systems in other cities) and overall globally, thus makes it easier for readers to track information down. Examples as such can be seen in the following links:
Nima Farid ( talk) 17:37, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (nac) Alakzi ( talk) 20:07, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Also brought up at Template talk:Xfce, Template talk:LXDE, these two templates doesn't seem on navbox purpose and listing would be more appropriate IMO. Otherwise we should create navbox for Gnome, KDE and every DE available Category:Desktop environments and why we limit to DEs? So it would be possible to make such thing for distros using systemd or udev or other low level or high level software which leads to a mess. – ebraminio talk 17:13, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (nac) Alakzi ( talk) 14:47, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Note:
Template:Cuba Squad 2012 Caribbean Cup has been retained, because three out of seven participants herein stated that championship-winning squads should be retained. While deletion discussion closures are not based upon a vote count, there is no consensus herein for Template:Cuba Squad 2012 Caribbean Cup to be deleted.
North America
1000
17:50, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: Upon further consideration, Template:Cuba squad 2012 Caribbean Cup has been deleted, per the fact that one user stated that they were "and indifferent for the rest" regarding the championship winning squads, and per another user stating "Delete non-champion roster templates per Frietjes' comment above", which implies, but does not directly state that the "per" !vote is also indifferent toward the championship winning squads. North America 1000 14:03, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Consensus is that we should only create squad templates for major tournaments like the World Cup, Confederations Cup, UEFA Euro, Gold Cup, etc. The Caribbean Cup is not a major tournament. – Michael ( talk) 22:38, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. Nakon 23:37, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused, deprecated template. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 22:11, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Opabinia regalis ( talk) 07:05, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
This could be interpreted as a
WP:POVFORK, attempting to treat "historic Lancashire" as a separate, parallel entity to "
Lancashire", which is against
WP:UKCOUNTIES guidelines. The template is somewhat confusing in that it is mixing modern-day elements within the ceremonial county boundaries with elements within the historic county boundaries. And it is cherry-picking Lancashire-related topics to support a particular POV. We already have a {{
Lancashire}}
template. There has been a brief discussion about this at
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography § County Palatine of Lancaster.
Dr Greg
talk
19:50, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
Historical Lancashire is a separate, parallel entity to ceremonial Lancashire in the UK. If the WP:UKCOUNTIES guidelines recognizes both as being the same, the guidelines are incorrect with need for a review. 2.217.52.199 ( talk) 13:28, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge. (nac) Alakzi ( talk) 19:00, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Infobox SMS station with
Template:Infobox station.
The first template seems to be redundant as the second one can be used to represent the same information. It can also be used to improve the representation of the information and also creates a uniformity between different transit systems in South Korea (ie with Korail stations and metro systems in other cities) and overall globally, thus makes it easier for readers to track information down. Examples as such can be seen in the following links:
Nima Farid ( talk) 17:37, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (nac) Alakzi ( talk) 20:07, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Also brought up at Template talk:Xfce, Template talk:LXDE, these two templates doesn't seem on navbox purpose and listing would be more appropriate IMO. Otherwise we should create navbox for Gnome, KDE and every DE available Category:Desktop environments and why we limit to DEs? So it would be possible to make such thing for distros using systemd or udev or other low level or high level software which leads to a mess. – ebraminio talk 17:13, 5 July 2015 (UTC)