The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:49, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Contains a grand total of one article, and is redundant to Template:UK Building Societies. QueenCake ( talk) 21:15, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
According to the linked website, the images cannot be used for commercial means. The "requirements" that the author lists at [1] include limits to how the images can be used. Due to the limits and the restriction of non-commerical, these files copyright status is in dispute. The author gives permission for use on Wikipedia, but the conditions do not make a free license. This is a bad template, that promotes the use of images that do not actually have a full free license. -- TLSuda ( talk) 21:03, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:48, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
WP:NENAN, does not provide much navigation. STATic message me! 02:04, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was redirect Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:54, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
This good ol' template had now been replaced in functionality by a recent edit that I performed on Template:About. Before I had merged the functionality of {{ Other uses-section}} into {{ About}}, {{ Other uses-section}} had only 10–15 transclusions that did not include "/doc" pages. I had originally nominated this template for speedy deletion criterion T3, but this nomination was denied by an administrator with the comment "It's been around for six years; either keep it or redirect it". Unfortunately, with {{ About}}'s new functionality, neither one of these options is really feasible for {{ Other uses-section}}; keeping it causes unnecessary redundancy to {{ About}}, and redirecting it misleads the editor into thinking that the template will automatically insert the "section" wording into the hatnote, which it does not. In my opinion, the "CSD T3" nomination was valid, and was even not contested by the creator of the template. In addition, the 10-15 transclusions of {{ Other uses-section}} that were mentioned above have already been replaced with {{ About}} seamlessly. And lastly, yes, this template has been around for six years, but if it's redundant and clearly eligible for "T3" deletion, age really doesn't play a factor; if it's redundant, it's redundant. Steel1943 ( talk) 01:53, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
{{
about}}
markup. And let's cut the histrionics. —
SMcCandlish ☺
☏
¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼
02:18, 16 May 2014 (UTC) Updated: 07:25, 16 May 2014 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:28, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Per past precedent, these sorts of templates have been deprecated where the states have the dedicated lists linked from the infobox. In this case, List of Interstate Highways in Georgia (U.S. state) and List of U.S. Highways in Georgia (U.S. state) have both been created and linked through {{ infobox road/browselinks/USA}} at the bottom of every Georgia highway article's infobox. Additionally, the navboxes are redundant to Category:Interstate Highways in Georgia (U.S. state) or Category:U.S. Highways in Georgia (U.S. state), respectively. Imzadi 1979 → 01:14, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:44, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Defunct cycling team. NickSt ( talk) 00:44, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:44, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Defunct cycling team. NickSt ( talk) 00:43, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:49, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Contains a grand total of one article, and is redundant to Template:UK Building Societies. QueenCake ( talk) 21:15, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
According to the linked website, the images cannot be used for commercial means. The "requirements" that the author lists at [1] include limits to how the images can be used. Due to the limits and the restriction of non-commerical, these files copyright status is in dispute. The author gives permission for use on Wikipedia, but the conditions do not make a free license. This is a bad template, that promotes the use of images that do not actually have a full free license. -- TLSuda ( talk) 21:03, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:48, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
WP:NENAN, does not provide much navigation. STATic message me! 02:04, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was redirect Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:54, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
This good ol' template had now been replaced in functionality by a recent edit that I performed on Template:About. Before I had merged the functionality of {{ Other uses-section}} into {{ About}}, {{ Other uses-section}} had only 10–15 transclusions that did not include "/doc" pages. I had originally nominated this template for speedy deletion criterion T3, but this nomination was denied by an administrator with the comment "It's been around for six years; either keep it or redirect it". Unfortunately, with {{ About}}'s new functionality, neither one of these options is really feasible for {{ Other uses-section}}; keeping it causes unnecessary redundancy to {{ About}}, and redirecting it misleads the editor into thinking that the template will automatically insert the "section" wording into the hatnote, which it does not. In my opinion, the "CSD T3" nomination was valid, and was even not contested by the creator of the template. In addition, the 10-15 transclusions of {{ Other uses-section}} that were mentioned above have already been replaced with {{ About}} seamlessly. And lastly, yes, this template has been around for six years, but if it's redundant and clearly eligible for "T3" deletion, age really doesn't play a factor; if it's redundant, it's redundant. Steel1943 ( talk) 01:53, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
{{
about}}
markup. And let's cut the histrionics. —
SMcCandlish ☺
☏
¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼
02:18, 16 May 2014 (UTC) Updated: 07:25, 16 May 2014 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:28, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Per past precedent, these sorts of templates have been deprecated where the states have the dedicated lists linked from the infobox. In this case, List of Interstate Highways in Georgia (U.S. state) and List of U.S. Highways in Georgia (U.S. state) have both been created and linked through {{ infobox road/browselinks/USA}} at the bottom of every Georgia highway article's infobox. Additionally, the navboxes are redundant to Category:Interstate Highways in Georgia (U.S. state) or Category:U.S. Highways in Georgia (U.S. state), respectively. Imzadi 1979 → 01:14, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:44, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Defunct cycling team. NickSt ( talk) 00:44, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:44, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Defunct cycling team. NickSt ( talk) 00:43, 16 May 2014 (UTC)