- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 May 8 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:49, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- Template:WikiProject status/Active ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:WikiProject status ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Not sure what is intended, but clearly not a template. Could not find a speedy reason to just allow deletion. Vegaswikian ( talk) 18:59, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:43, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- Template:Broken ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
This template is used on one page (and is possibly unnecessary) and says in the documentation not to used it. Jamesx 12345 19:06, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep clearly if a page isn't displaying properly, we should mark it so for our readership, so they don't get the wrong idea about where the error comes from (such as from a virus on their own personal machine). And the instructions should be modified to indicate that when the template is used, one should always post a message to VP about the page. I would think use should always be rare, but it would be a good idea to use it when necessary. --
65.94.171.206 (
talk)
22:57, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Most of the html Wikipedia uses is very well established, and most "interactive" features are tables and gifs. Jamesx 12345 17:21, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comment the TFD discussion from 2010 indicates that the /doc page is a false documentation, and the real documentation is on the template doc page. -- 65.94.171.206 ( talk) 22:59, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- This was a weak close the first time. The question of a template's utility is not whether some random IP could dream up a use for it, it's whether it's actually being used. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 14:42, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per the others. Essentially unused and unneeded. (In the one place it is used, there is no indication why the template was put there to begin with, rendering it meaningless.) — This, that and the other (talk) 11:04, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- delete, can't see it being widely used. Frietjes ( talk) 23:42, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 May 8 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:49, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- Template:WikiProject status/Active ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:WikiProject status ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Not sure what is intended, but clearly not a template. Could not find a speedy reason to just allow deletion. Vegaswikian ( talk) 18:59, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:43, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- Template:Broken ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
This template is used on one page (and is possibly unnecessary) and says in the documentation not to used it. Jamesx 12345 19:06, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep clearly if a page isn't displaying properly, we should mark it so for our readership, so they don't get the wrong idea about where the error comes from (such as from a virus on their own personal machine). And the instructions should be modified to indicate that when the template is used, one should always post a message to VP about the page. I would think use should always be rare, but it would be a good idea to use it when necessary. --
65.94.171.206 (
talk)
22:57, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Most of the html Wikipedia uses is very well established, and most "interactive" features are tables and gifs. Jamesx 12345 17:21, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comment the TFD discussion from 2010 indicates that the /doc page is a false documentation, and the real documentation is on the template doc page. -- 65.94.171.206 ( talk) 22:59, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- This was a weak close the first time. The question of a template's utility is not whether some random IP could dream up a use for it, it's whether it's actually being used. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 14:42, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per the others. Essentially unused and unneeded. (In the one place it is used, there is no indication why the template was put there to begin with, rendering it meaningless.) — This, that and the other (talk) 11:04, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- delete, can't see it being widely used. Frietjes ( talk) 23:42, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.