The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:25, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Being 87% redlinks this qualifies under WP:NENAN. Technical 13 ( talk) 23:00, 17 April 2013 (UTC) Technical 13 ( talk) 23:00, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. As pointed out below, this template is simply a wrapper for other templates, some of which have no blue links. Perhaps those should be nominated first or along with this template? Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:23, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
This template contains probably close to a hundred internal links - in essence it's a mini version of the list in The Leading Hotels of the World. As such, it's cluttered to the point of WP:IINFO, redundant to the previously mentioned list (requiring twice the maintenance), and not helpful in most articles, as most readers who look for information about a specific hotel are not likely to be interested in an article about a random luxury hotel on some other continent. In addition, I'm not convinced that a hotel's membership in this association is so important that it needs to be prominently highlighted – promoted? – in a huge navbox at the bottom of each article. Sandstein 18:08, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Keep Per Dr Blofeld. Why don't we just cut out any redlinks that are likely to never have an article? MIVP - (Can I Help? ◕‿◕) (Maybe a bit of tea for thought?) 08:32, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Unfortunately, there was not as much input on this discussion as others. However, I found the argument that (1) there are one two albums and one single with articles compelling, as well as (2) the argument that Yahzarah discography does a great job connecting these articles, and (3) the argument that a small number of links could be placed in a see also section, or in the navigational portion of an infobox. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:30, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
WP:NENAN. Not enough links to warrant a nav box. The link to the discography immediately makes clear that there is nothing more to link. The Banner talk 11:59, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Reply - I am perfectly aware that "[not] every freaking item needs a direct link to every freaking item", which is why I have refrained from creating navboxes about musicians without any solo career. Like motion pictures, putting every film that actors/actresses star in may create navbox clutter. However, IMO, in "Template:Yahzarah":
Some of the articles involved are so long that having a conspicuous navbox would be helpful. What specific policy talks about "wikilinking in the articles"? Also, I did not ignore ALL of the criticism in the RFC. I have made sure to pipe links, include the navbox on most of the articles and try to include all articles in the navboxes that I can personally contemplate. Again, how was {{ 13th Floor Elevators}} not properly linked, and how was "Template:Venomous Concept" another example of an incomplete template that [I] only complete after a nomination? I hope this is not another example of questions that are ignored like before. This meets the rule of 5, so if Wikilinking is the solution, then there would be no navboxes at all.
BTW, the TfD for {{ Rozz Williams}} has been open for over one month. When will it be dispositioned? -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 16:50, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:25, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Being 87% redlinks this qualifies under WP:NENAN. Technical 13 ( talk) 23:00, 17 April 2013 (UTC) Technical 13 ( talk) 23:00, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. As pointed out below, this template is simply a wrapper for other templates, some of which have no blue links. Perhaps those should be nominated first or along with this template? Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:23, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
This template contains probably close to a hundred internal links - in essence it's a mini version of the list in The Leading Hotels of the World. As such, it's cluttered to the point of WP:IINFO, redundant to the previously mentioned list (requiring twice the maintenance), and not helpful in most articles, as most readers who look for information about a specific hotel are not likely to be interested in an article about a random luxury hotel on some other continent. In addition, I'm not convinced that a hotel's membership in this association is so important that it needs to be prominently highlighted – promoted? – in a huge navbox at the bottom of each article. Sandstein 18:08, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Keep Per Dr Blofeld. Why don't we just cut out any redlinks that are likely to never have an article? MIVP - (Can I Help? ◕‿◕) (Maybe a bit of tea for thought?) 08:32, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Unfortunately, there was not as much input on this discussion as others. However, I found the argument that (1) there are one two albums and one single with articles compelling, as well as (2) the argument that Yahzarah discography does a great job connecting these articles, and (3) the argument that a small number of links could be placed in a see also section, or in the navigational portion of an infobox. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:30, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
WP:NENAN. Not enough links to warrant a nav box. The link to the discography immediately makes clear that there is nothing more to link. The Banner talk 11:59, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Reply - I am perfectly aware that "[not] every freaking item needs a direct link to every freaking item", which is why I have refrained from creating navboxes about musicians without any solo career. Like motion pictures, putting every film that actors/actresses star in may create navbox clutter. However, IMO, in "Template:Yahzarah":
Some of the articles involved are so long that having a conspicuous navbox would be helpful. What specific policy talks about "wikilinking in the articles"? Also, I did not ignore ALL of the criticism in the RFC. I have made sure to pipe links, include the navbox on most of the articles and try to include all articles in the navboxes that I can personally contemplate. Again, how was {{ 13th Floor Elevators}} not properly linked, and how was "Template:Venomous Concept" another example of an incomplete template that [I] only complete after a nomination? I hope this is not another example of questions that are ignored like before. This meets the rule of 5, so if Wikilinking is the solution, then there would be no navboxes at all.
BTW, the TfD for {{ Rozz Williams}} has been open for over one month. When will it be dispositioned? -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 16:50, 18 April 2013 (UTC)