The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:40, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Navbox with only 2 links: the parent article and 1 related. It's not even used in the related article, so it only links back to the 1 article it's used in. Not enough related articles to necessitate/benefit from a navbox ( WP:NAVBOX). IllaZilla ( talk) 20:50, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. WOSlinker ( talk) 19:37, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
Template is only employed on a single article and consists mostly of redlinks. Lmatt ( talk) 20:17, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:41, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
WP:NENAN. Technically doesn't navigate much — only 3 of them have articles, then their discography. Awards is a redlink, and "selected clients" should just go since it's a totally abritrary list. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 00:40, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:50, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Pointless template. It can be replaced by Template:Top 100 booking stations of Indian Railways. -- Rsrikanth05 ( talk) 13:22, 27 September 2012 (UTC) Rsrikanth05 ( talk) 13:22, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:46, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Just a container for {{
confusing|section}}
. ❤
Yutsi
Talk/
Contributions ( 偉特 )
15:04, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
this is doing. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 09:58, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete, will userfy upon request. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:46, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Mostly redirects or piped links. Take those out without a direct connection to this individual and there's really nothing left to warrant a navbox for this person. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 22:16, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:40, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Navbox with only 2 links: the parent article and 1 related. It's not even used in the related article, so it only links back to the 1 article it's used in. Not enough related articles to necessitate/benefit from a navbox ( WP:NAVBOX). IllaZilla ( talk) 20:50, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. WOSlinker ( talk) 19:37, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
Template is only employed on a single article and consists mostly of redlinks. Lmatt ( talk) 20:17, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:41, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
WP:NENAN. Technically doesn't navigate much — only 3 of them have articles, then their discography. Awards is a redlink, and "selected clients" should just go since it's a totally abritrary list. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 00:40, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:50, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Pointless template. It can be replaced by Template:Top 100 booking stations of Indian Railways. -- Rsrikanth05 ( talk) 13:22, 27 September 2012 (UTC) Rsrikanth05 ( talk) 13:22, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:46, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Just a container for {{
confusing|section}}
. ❤
Yutsi
Talk/
Contributions ( 偉特 )
15:04, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
this is doing. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 09:58, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete, will userfy upon request. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:46, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Mostly redirects or piped links. Take those out without a direct connection to this individual and there's really nothing left to warrant a navbox for this person. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 22:16, 27 September 2012 (UTC)