The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:33, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Redundant to other television and fictional character infoboxes, with the exception of the Flashback1/Centric
field, which is a mixture of
WP:OR and
WP:TRIVIA. —
Justin (koavf)❤
T☮
C☺
M☯
22:49, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
|age=
, |Residence=
, |Place=
. These parameter can be useful for other series, too.
mabdul
12:30, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:33, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Navbox consists almost entirely of red links. There is no main article for Winter Baseball Leagues in Victoria that established notability of this grouping. — Bagumba ( talk) 21:01, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:33, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Navbox consists almost entirely of red links, including the main article Baseball Victoria Summer League. Violates the spirit of WP:NAV. — Bagumba ( talk) 18:57, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Malik Shabazz ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
The template's items are arbitrary and no specific criteria was cited in order to substantiate notability or verifiality of the subject. In essence, almost all universities undertake or include research in their curriculum. No consortium currently exists that support the subject of the template, unlike the Association of East Asian Research Universities or the International Alliance of Research Universities. Since no verifiable source can ascertain the subject at hand, I'm concerned that this is altogether just original research, thus I suggest deletion of the template. Refer to WP:VERIFY, WP:NOR, WP:NOTABILITY. Xeltran ( talk) 13:19, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:32, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Appears to be an informational template formatted to look like a stub notice. Perhaps it could be converted into a navbox listing the 133 entities in question? Or maybe the article listing same should be linked from the infoboxes or some existing navbox. Please discuss. ― cobaltcigs 12:20, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge as suggested. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:32, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar v1 is available at {{
Userpagebarn}} and should be merged with the |alt=
.
mabdul
12:22, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
|alt=
as described in the nom (see also
WP:*). (keep in mind that this is Templates for discussion)
mabdul
13:17, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:30, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Procedural only. Template's original TFD entry on April 12 was removed in this edit by the nominator and discussion was never properly concluded. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 21:02, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Original discussion from April 12: This template does not specifically say which is which and not enough links are given to fully understand it. Please consider revising it or it could be deleted, and we don't want that to happen! Thank you! Plmnji ( talk) 01:32, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus, there may be consensus to merge the three decade boxes if just those three were relisted, but there is no consensus to merge everything. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:31, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Campaignbox Palestinian insurgency in South Lebanon with
Template:Palestinian militancy attacks in the 1960s,
template:Palestinian militancy attacks in the 1970s and
template:Palestinian militancy attacks in the 1980s.
In my opinion this template is redundant since it provides essentially the same identical information as in the templates
template:Palestinian militancy attacks in the 1960s,
template:Palestinian militancy attacks in the 1970s and
template:Palestinian militancy attacks in the 1980s. It seems ridiculous to have all these separate templates sharing the same info. Therefore I suggest that we'll merge the content of this template into the three templates aforementioned. What do you think?
TheCuriousGnome (
talk)
06:36, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:33, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Redundant to other television and fictional character infoboxes, with the exception of the Flashback1/Centric
field, which is a mixture of
WP:OR and
WP:TRIVIA. —
Justin (koavf)❤
T☮
C☺
M☯
22:49, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
|age=
, |Residence=
, |Place=
. These parameter can be useful for other series, too.
mabdul
12:30, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:33, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Navbox consists almost entirely of red links. There is no main article for Winter Baseball Leagues in Victoria that established notability of this grouping. — Bagumba ( talk) 21:01, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:33, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Navbox consists almost entirely of red links, including the main article Baseball Victoria Summer League. Violates the spirit of WP:NAV. — Bagumba ( talk) 18:57, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Malik Shabazz ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
The template's items are arbitrary and no specific criteria was cited in order to substantiate notability or verifiality of the subject. In essence, almost all universities undertake or include research in their curriculum. No consortium currently exists that support the subject of the template, unlike the Association of East Asian Research Universities or the International Alliance of Research Universities. Since no verifiable source can ascertain the subject at hand, I'm concerned that this is altogether just original research, thus I suggest deletion of the template. Refer to WP:VERIFY, WP:NOR, WP:NOTABILITY. Xeltran ( talk) 13:19, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:32, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Appears to be an informational template formatted to look like a stub notice. Perhaps it could be converted into a navbox listing the 133 entities in question? Or maybe the article listing same should be linked from the infoboxes or some existing navbox. Please discuss. ― cobaltcigs 12:20, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge as suggested. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:32, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar v1 is available at {{
Userpagebarn}} and should be merged with the |alt=
.
mabdul
12:22, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
|alt=
as described in the nom (see also
WP:*). (keep in mind that this is Templates for discussion)
mabdul
13:17, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:30, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Procedural only. Template's original TFD entry on April 12 was removed in this edit by the nominator and discussion was never properly concluded. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 21:02, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Original discussion from April 12: This template does not specifically say which is which and not enough links are given to fully understand it. Please consider revising it or it could be deleted, and we don't want that to happen! Thank you! Plmnji ( talk) 01:32, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus, there may be consensus to merge the three decade boxes if just those three were relisted, but there is no consensus to merge everything. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:31, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Campaignbox Palestinian insurgency in South Lebanon with
Template:Palestinian militancy attacks in the 1960s,
template:Palestinian militancy attacks in the 1970s and
template:Palestinian militancy attacks in the 1980s.
In my opinion this template is redundant since it provides essentially the same identical information as in the templates
template:Palestinian militancy attacks in the 1960s,
template:Palestinian militancy attacks in the 1970s and
template:Palestinian militancy attacks in the 1980s. It seems ridiculous to have all these separate templates sharing the same info. Therefore I suggest that we'll merge the content of this template into the three templates aforementioned. What do you think?
TheCuriousGnome (
talk)
06:36, 23 April 2012 (UTC)