The result of the discussion was delete as there are no objections and the templates are orphaned. I can restore/userfy/projectfy any of them upon request. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:00, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
as far as I can tell, these are all orphaned (except some of the ND ones, which are only used in user space), and many have been orphaned for a very long time. I have not tagged them, since there are so many. could be moved to userspace or project space of course. Frietjes ( talk) 21:31, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:03, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
This is only used on two articles, and the template only refers to a single article ( Battle of Killdeer Mountain). This should be deleted, but I wouldn't object to recreation if there are more articles on the topic in the future. Merging to an broader topic template might also make sense. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 13:50, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:03, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
This is a misplaced talk page comment from 2007, not a template. Can we subst and delete it? John of Reading ( talk) 10:53, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:04, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
This template can be replaced by {{Copy edit|for=Capitalization}}. (I have done this for articles so tagged up to this evening).This is an improvement, as it will include the tagged article in the copy edit categories that are serviced by the monthly GOCE drives. Stfg ( talk) 20:26, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:05, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Club no longer exists so this template serves no purpose. Mattythewhite ( talk) 00:07, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete as there are no objections and the templates are orphaned. I can restore/userfy/projectfy any of them upon request. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:00, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
as far as I can tell, these are all orphaned (except some of the ND ones, which are only used in user space), and many have been orphaned for a very long time. I have not tagged them, since there are so many. could be moved to userspace or project space of course. Frietjes ( talk) 21:31, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:03, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
This is only used on two articles, and the template only refers to a single article ( Battle of Killdeer Mountain). This should be deleted, but I wouldn't object to recreation if there are more articles on the topic in the future. Merging to an broader topic template might also make sense. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 13:50, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:03, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
This is a misplaced talk page comment from 2007, not a template. Can we subst and delete it? John of Reading ( talk) 10:53, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:04, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
This template can be replaced by {{Copy edit|for=Capitalization}}. (I have done this for articles so tagged up to this evening).This is an improvement, as it will include the tagged article in the copy edit categories that are serviced by the monthly GOCE drives. Stfg ( talk) 20:26, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:05, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Club no longer exists so this template serves no purpose. Mattythewhite ( talk) 00:07, 30 March 2012 (UTC)