- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
only one transclusion, no chance that there will be more articles using that template. Should be 'Substed and then deleted. mabdul 21:32, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Johnfos ( talk) 12:49, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was No Consensus. - FASTILY (TALK) 02:11, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- Template:Scotty McCreery ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
One album and two singles is not enough links to necessitate a navbox and thus fails WP:NENAN. Aspects ( talk) 16:58, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep, he will likely release more singles/albums. mabdul 21:42, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- Template:Helpbox nofloat ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
hardcoded fork of {{
helpbox}} with only a handful of userspace transclusions. Can be replaced with {{
helpbox|float=none}}.
Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (
talk)
11:50, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
- Redirect/use it as a wrapper.
mabdul
21:40, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
- It would take more time to write a wrapper than it would to update the existing transclusions simply to point at the parent template. This isn't something that a wrapper is useful for. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 10:18, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:57, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
only one transclusion, no chance that there will be more articles using that template. Should be 'Substed and then deleted. mabdul 21:32, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Johnfos ( talk) 12:49, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was No Consensus. - FASTILY (TALK) 02:11, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- Template:Scotty McCreery ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
One album and two singles is not enough links to necessitate a navbox and thus fails WP:NENAN. Aspects ( talk) 16:58, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep, he will likely release more singles/albums. mabdul 21:42, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- Template:Helpbox nofloat ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
hardcoded fork of {{
helpbox}} with only a handful of userspace transclusions. Can be replaced with {{
helpbox|float=none}}.
Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (
talk)
11:50, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
- Redirect/use it as a wrapper.
mabdul
21:40, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
- It would take more time to write a wrapper than it would to update the existing transclusions simply to point at the parent template. This isn't something that a wrapper is useful for. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 10:18, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:57, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.