The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:13, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
purpose of this template is unclear, and currently, it is being used completely incorrectly in articles. on some other WPs this template is used to set a background colour for promotion/relegation, but here it does something different. I would say redirect it, but the syntax used on other WPs is not the same as our background colour templates (e.g., what colour is R1? ). Frietjes ( talk) 20:32, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:07, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
old, and probably unused since it links dates. we already have this functionality in citation templates. Frietjes ( talk) 20:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was userfy Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:07, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
userfy? Frietjes ( talk) 19:57, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:05, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
WP is not a television guide, poor colour contrast, and better presented as plain text. Frietjes ( talk) 19:55, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:04, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
navigates nothing. Frietjes ( talk) 19:55, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Redirect Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:04, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
old and unused and appears basically redundant to {{ very large}} or another template like it. Frietjes ( talk) 19:47, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:55, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
old and unused, there are easier ways to indent a legend marker. Frietjes ( talk) 19:41, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:00, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
redundant to the first two sections of {{ Tirana}}. Frietjes ( talk) 18:20, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. See comment. — This, that, and the other (talk) 08:03, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia evidently doesn't have much to say about Kavajë. WP:NENAN. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:18, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Or you could simply ask me to expand something..♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:36, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was redirect Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:58, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Inferior to merely using username{{@}}example.com. It's also almost the exact same thing as Template:No spam, except with the useless ability to make the username of the email small. — Yutsi Talk/ Contributions ( 偉特 ) 04:19, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:39, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
A boilerplate user talk message that appears to have never been used. It's all very nice, but I think the use case for such a message is minimal. Moreover, with no incoming links, no-one seems to know that it exists! — This, that, and the other (talk) 03:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Rich
Farmbrough,
13:00, 10 July 2012 (UTC).
The result of the discussion was keep for now Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:34, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Completely redlinked navbox. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 02:56, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:53, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Template is invalid. See Commons:Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/German stamps review. Not currently used for any files, so can safely be deleted. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:12, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:53, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Template is invalid. See Commons:Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/German stamps review. Not currently used for any files, so can safely be deleted. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:12, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:13, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
purpose of this template is unclear, and currently, it is being used completely incorrectly in articles. on some other WPs this template is used to set a background colour for promotion/relegation, but here it does something different. I would say redirect it, but the syntax used on other WPs is not the same as our background colour templates (e.g., what colour is R1? ). Frietjes ( talk) 20:32, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:07, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
old, and probably unused since it links dates. we already have this functionality in citation templates. Frietjes ( talk) 20:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was userfy Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:07, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
userfy? Frietjes ( talk) 19:57, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:05, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
WP is not a television guide, poor colour contrast, and better presented as plain text. Frietjes ( talk) 19:55, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:04, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
navigates nothing. Frietjes ( talk) 19:55, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Redirect Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:04, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
old and unused and appears basically redundant to {{ very large}} or another template like it. Frietjes ( talk) 19:47, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:55, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
old and unused, there are easier ways to indent a legend marker. Frietjes ( talk) 19:41, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:00, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
redundant to the first two sections of {{ Tirana}}. Frietjes ( talk) 18:20, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. See comment. — This, that, and the other (talk) 08:03, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia evidently doesn't have much to say about Kavajë. WP:NENAN. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:18, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Or you could simply ask me to expand something..♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:36, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was redirect Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:58, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Inferior to merely using username{{@}}example.com. It's also almost the exact same thing as Template:No spam, except with the useless ability to make the username of the email small. — Yutsi Talk/ Contributions ( 偉特 ) 04:19, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:39, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
A boilerplate user talk message that appears to have never been used. It's all very nice, but I think the use case for such a message is minimal. Moreover, with no incoming links, no-one seems to know that it exists! — This, that, and the other (talk) 03:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Rich
Farmbrough,
13:00, 10 July 2012 (UTC).
The result of the discussion was keep for now Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:34, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Completely redlinked navbox. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 02:56, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:53, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Template is invalid. See Commons:Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/German stamps review. Not currently used for any files, so can safely be deleted. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:12, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:53, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Template is invalid. See Commons:Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/German stamps review. Not currently used for any files, so can safely be deleted. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:12, 10 July 2012 (UTC)