The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator. Titoxd( ?!? - cool stuff) 22:23, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
pointless additional markup with a dubious aesthetic gain and a negative impact to output readability and accessibility. If additional whitespace is necessary it should be added automatically by CSS rather than manually with junk HTML. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 23:37, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
... {{Hurricane season bar button |intensity=storm |stormname=Jose |strength=Tropical Storm |linkname=Tropical Storm Jose (2005) |storminitial=J }} </tr><tr> {{Hurricane season bar button |intensity=cat5 |stormname=Katrina |strength=Category 5 |linkname=Hurricane Katrina |storminitial=K }} ...
(which can happen in multiple times per template for active seasons) instead of
... {{Hurricane season bar button |intensity=storm |stormname=Jose |strength=Tropical Storm |linkname=Tropical Storm Jose (2005) |storminitial=J }} {{hurricane season bar gap}} {{Hurricane season bar button |intensity=cat5 |stormname=Katrina |strength=Category 5 |linkname=Hurricane Katrina |storminitial=K }} ...
Is neither cleaner, nor more user-friendly. Headbomb { talk / contribs / physics / books} 00:29, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Almost Allall the episodes of this template have been redirected.
Curb Chain (
talk)
23:21, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
almost all redlinks. Frietjes ( talk) 21:09, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G6 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
no parent article, and almost all redlinks or redirects. Frietjes ( talk) 20:52, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. speedy delete, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:38, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Recent creation, no reason why a single link needs to be a template. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 20:13, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
<ref name="independent">{{independent |class=album | label=Lana Del Rey – ''Born to Die'' > Review |last=Gill |first=Andy |accessdate=Feb 20, 2012}}</ref>
which seems to be the debris left behind following
this series of GF edits. Unfortunately it's hidden a valid pre-existing ref which is also named <ref name="independent">
.<ref name=something>{{cite ...}}</ref>
and thinks that the name and double braces are both mandatory parts of the ref. They wish to cite from
The Independent, so put <ref name=Independent>{{Independent}}</ref>
. Usually this is the end of the story: but they may look at the refs section and wonder why it's come up red, so click on it and find that they "need" to create a page. In goes the URL, job done. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
21:02, 20 February 2012 (UTC)The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
unused, hardcoded hatnote. Frietjes ( talk) 18:40, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:35, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Hardcoded instances of {{ compactTOC8}}. Recommend that these be substituted, as the code is simple enough to be included directly in the relevant articles. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 16:44, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Unused, and isn't a TOC anyway: it's a proto-sidebar for content which really doesn't need it. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 16:41, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
single-use hardcoded horizontal TOC. The sole transclusion would not be adversely affected by using a standard TOC layout or {{ TOClimit}} instead. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 16:35, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:30, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Extremely short horizontal hardcoded TOCs. Even if they weren't redundant to {{ horizontaltoc}}, articles will not be adversely affected by having a vertical TOC for such a short list. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 16:33, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Hard-coded, single-use TOC template which simply duplicates the section headers in a horizontal format. Redundant to {{ horizontaltoc}}. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 16:24, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Unused minor variant of {{ compactTOC8}}, which already has a gazillion options. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 15:49, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Unused minor TOC variant (contrary to the documentation, it isn't used at {{ GeoTemplate}}). Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 15:35, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:27, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Single-use TOC template which is probably too detailed for its own good, with per-paragraph links. Deleting this and using something like {{ TOClimit}} to keep the TOC length sane would not adversely affect the browseability of the article. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 15:21, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Unused minor TOC variant. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 15:06, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Unused minor TOC variant. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 15:03, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Unused and overwrought TOC layout variant. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 14:17, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Unused minor TOC variant. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 14:14, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
I've added a 48states=yes
flag to {{
TOC US states 2}}, which eliminates the need for a new template.
Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (
talk)
14:11, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Unused minor TOC variant. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 14:04, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Merge. - FASTILY (TALK) 04:04, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:AFC Challenge Cup squads with
Template:AFC Challenge Cup.
Both are related and would be easier/better to have just one template in the same manner as
Template:Africa Cup of Nations.
Banana Fingers (
talk)
13:47, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Unused and superfluous alternative TOC layout. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 13:45, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Unused and overwrought variant of a template which already has enough features to do nearly anything. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 13:30, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:11, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Hugely overwrought manual TOCs which do nothing but lay out the present contents (hard-coded) in a horizontal rather than vertical list. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 13:04, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was speedy keep, non-admin closure (nominator has retracted the nomination). — SMcCandlish Talk⇒〈°⌊°〉 Contribs. 12:14, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
None of the articles about FGC stations actually use this system of naming. Liam98 7 12:50, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
{{
s-line}}
has |system=FGC
, it relies on the existence of {{
FGC stations}}
. If the generated station names are wrong, either (i) amend
Template:FGC stations so that it does follow the appropriate system of naming; or (ii) create suitable redirects. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
12:55, 20 February 2012 (UTC)The result of the discussion was no consensus, suggest further discussion to determine the best way to reduce the redundancy (merge or split). Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:30, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Only duplicates a section of their parent navboxes, ( Template:BC Lions, Template:Calgary Stampeders, Template:Edmonton Eskimos, Template:Hamilton Tiger-Cats, Template:Montreal Alouettes, Template:Ottawa Renegades, Template:Ottawa Rough Riders, Template:Saskatchewan Roughriders, Template:Toronto Argonauts, Template:Winnipeg Blue Bombers). 117Avenue ( talk) 03:28, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Textbook WP:NENAN. Navigates only two towns. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 02:53, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:14, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Included in Template:NDP, along with much more. 117Avenue ( talk) 01:22, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
The club no longer exists so this template serves no purpose. Mattythewhite ( talk) 00:48, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator. Titoxd( ?!? - cool stuff) 22:23, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
pointless additional markup with a dubious aesthetic gain and a negative impact to output readability and accessibility. If additional whitespace is necessary it should be added automatically by CSS rather than manually with junk HTML. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 23:37, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
... {{Hurricane season bar button |intensity=storm |stormname=Jose |strength=Tropical Storm |linkname=Tropical Storm Jose (2005) |storminitial=J }} </tr><tr> {{Hurricane season bar button |intensity=cat5 |stormname=Katrina |strength=Category 5 |linkname=Hurricane Katrina |storminitial=K }} ...
(which can happen in multiple times per template for active seasons) instead of
... {{Hurricane season bar button |intensity=storm |stormname=Jose |strength=Tropical Storm |linkname=Tropical Storm Jose (2005) |storminitial=J }} {{hurricane season bar gap}} {{Hurricane season bar button |intensity=cat5 |stormname=Katrina |strength=Category 5 |linkname=Hurricane Katrina |storminitial=K }} ...
Is neither cleaner, nor more user-friendly. Headbomb { talk / contribs / physics / books} 00:29, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Almost Allall the episodes of this template have been redirected.
Curb Chain (
talk)
23:21, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
almost all redlinks. Frietjes ( talk) 21:09, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G6 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
no parent article, and almost all redlinks or redirects. Frietjes ( talk) 20:52, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. speedy delete, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:38, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Recent creation, no reason why a single link needs to be a template. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 20:13, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
<ref name="independent">{{independent |class=album | label=Lana Del Rey – ''Born to Die'' > Review |last=Gill |first=Andy |accessdate=Feb 20, 2012}}</ref>
which seems to be the debris left behind following
this series of GF edits. Unfortunately it's hidden a valid pre-existing ref which is also named <ref name="independent">
.<ref name=something>{{cite ...}}</ref>
and thinks that the name and double braces are both mandatory parts of the ref. They wish to cite from
The Independent, so put <ref name=Independent>{{Independent}}</ref>
. Usually this is the end of the story: but they may look at the refs section and wonder why it's come up red, so click on it and find that they "need" to create a page. In goes the URL, job done. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
21:02, 20 February 2012 (UTC)The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
unused, hardcoded hatnote. Frietjes ( talk) 18:40, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:35, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Hardcoded instances of {{ compactTOC8}}. Recommend that these be substituted, as the code is simple enough to be included directly in the relevant articles. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 16:44, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Unused, and isn't a TOC anyway: it's a proto-sidebar for content which really doesn't need it. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 16:41, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
single-use hardcoded horizontal TOC. The sole transclusion would not be adversely affected by using a standard TOC layout or {{ TOClimit}} instead. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 16:35, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:30, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Extremely short horizontal hardcoded TOCs. Even if they weren't redundant to {{ horizontaltoc}}, articles will not be adversely affected by having a vertical TOC for such a short list. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 16:33, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Hard-coded, single-use TOC template which simply duplicates the section headers in a horizontal format. Redundant to {{ horizontaltoc}}. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 16:24, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Unused minor variant of {{ compactTOC8}}, which already has a gazillion options. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 15:49, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Unused minor TOC variant (contrary to the documentation, it isn't used at {{ GeoTemplate}}). Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 15:35, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:27, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Single-use TOC template which is probably too detailed for its own good, with per-paragraph links. Deleting this and using something like {{ TOClimit}} to keep the TOC length sane would not adversely affect the browseability of the article. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 15:21, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Unused minor TOC variant. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 15:06, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Unused minor TOC variant. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 15:03, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Unused and overwrought TOC layout variant. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 14:17, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Unused minor TOC variant. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 14:14, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
I've added a 48states=yes
flag to {{
TOC US states 2}}, which eliminates the need for a new template.
Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (
talk)
14:11, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Unused minor TOC variant. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 14:04, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Merge. - FASTILY (TALK) 04:04, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:AFC Challenge Cup squads with
Template:AFC Challenge Cup.
Both are related and would be easier/better to have just one template in the same manner as
Template:Africa Cup of Nations.
Banana Fingers (
talk)
13:47, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Unused and superfluous alternative TOC layout. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 13:45, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Unused and overwrought variant of a template which already has enough features to do nearly anything. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 13:30, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:11, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Hugely overwrought manual TOCs which do nothing but lay out the present contents (hard-coded) in a horizontal rather than vertical list. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 13:04, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was speedy keep, non-admin closure (nominator has retracted the nomination). — SMcCandlish Talk⇒〈°⌊°〉 Contribs. 12:14, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
None of the articles about FGC stations actually use this system of naming. Liam98 7 12:50, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
{{
s-line}}
has |system=FGC
, it relies on the existence of {{
FGC stations}}
. If the generated station names are wrong, either (i) amend
Template:FGC stations so that it does follow the appropriate system of naming; or (ii) create suitable redirects. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
12:55, 20 February 2012 (UTC)The result of the discussion was no consensus, suggest further discussion to determine the best way to reduce the redundancy (merge or split). Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:30, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Only duplicates a section of their parent navboxes, ( Template:BC Lions, Template:Calgary Stampeders, Template:Edmonton Eskimos, Template:Hamilton Tiger-Cats, Template:Montreal Alouettes, Template:Ottawa Renegades, Template:Ottawa Rough Riders, Template:Saskatchewan Roughriders, Template:Toronto Argonauts, Template:Winnipeg Blue Bombers). 117Avenue ( talk) 03:28, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Textbook WP:NENAN. Navigates only two towns. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 02:53, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:14, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Included in Template:NDP, along with much more. 117Avenue ( talk) 01:22, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
The club no longer exists so this template serves no purpose. Mattythewhite ( talk) 00:48, 20 February 2012 (UTC)