The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:54, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
Propose deletion Template is not used and is not likely to be used. Levdr1 ( talk) 23:50, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:23, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Further with
Template:See also2.
Hatnotes. Effect will be: hatnote will read "See also: ...", not "Further information: ...". Semantically they are the same. Reducing the hatnote text-variants is just plain simple.
{{
further|[[TOPIC]], and [[TOPIC2]]}}
→
{{
see also2|[[TOPIC]], and [[TOPIC2]]}}
→
Technically: both have the same structure, allowing free text for the 1st parameter. {{ Further}} to become redirect, or botwise replacement. - DePiep ( talk) 03:24, 8 February 2011 (UTC) Earlier TfD: 2007_May_11 (Keep). - DePiep ( talk) 03:38, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:24, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Propose deletion: This is just an overly specific variation of {{ In-universe}} and redundant to it, as it has "subject" parameter. I also nominate the following templates for the same reason:
{{In-universe/Star Trek}}
→ {{In-universe|subject=Star Trek|category=Star Trek}}
{{In-universe|subject=Star Trek}}
{{In-universe|category=Star Trek}}
to an article will place it in
Category:Star Trek articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction. The "subject" parameter, which I mentioned above, merely identifies the subject in the message box and perhaps can be removed altogether. --
Black Falcon (
talk)
02:26, 5 March 2011 (UTC){{In-universe/Star Trek}}
with {{In-universe|category=Star Trek}}
. The documentation for {{
In-universe}} was incomplete, however, but I have attempted to improve it by restoring usage instructions pertaining to the three optional parameters. --
Black Falcon (
talk)
05:13, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
{{In-universe/<foo>}}
to {{In-universe|<foo>}}
is a very, very simple edit. It just requires adding the code to identify and categorize by that unnamed parameter. Leaving it as "1" just requires a single pipe. If page type is to supersede that, the edit would need 2 pipes and the additional coding should be in place at the same time. -
J Greb (
talk)
16:54, 12 March 2011 (UTC)The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:56, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
The Muslim Guild has gone away. Superseded by {{ WPIslam-invite}}. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:21, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was 'delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 01:23, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Old, unused template. Purpose unclear. Near impossible to decipher this spaghetti code. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:18, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:57, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
Superseded by {{ Shaivism}}. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:53, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:57, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
Unused. Superseded by {{ Super Robot Wars}}. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:06, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:22, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Informative template, but unfortunately with an unclear scope. Where would it be placed? Also unsourced and unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:04, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:40, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
Unused. WP:NENAN - only two articles. — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:53, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete, but please do userfy or revive if there is consensus to put it to use. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:16, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
No longer used by the CfD process; see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion#How to use Cfd. No longer needed. — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:51, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:59, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
I don't think the channels transmitted by a particular pay TV service represents a close topic navigation (per WP:NAVBOX). For example, how many different pay TV services would transmit National Geographic Channel? What if they all had navboxes on that article? There would be too many. Template currently unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:45, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:54, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
Propose deletion Template is not used and is not likely to be used. Levdr1 ( talk) 23:50, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:23, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Further with
Template:See also2.
Hatnotes. Effect will be: hatnote will read "See also: ...", not "Further information: ...". Semantically they are the same. Reducing the hatnote text-variants is just plain simple.
{{
further|[[TOPIC]], and [[TOPIC2]]}}
→
{{
see also2|[[TOPIC]], and [[TOPIC2]]}}
→
Technically: both have the same structure, allowing free text for the 1st parameter. {{ Further}} to become redirect, or botwise replacement. - DePiep ( talk) 03:24, 8 February 2011 (UTC) Earlier TfD: 2007_May_11 (Keep). - DePiep ( talk) 03:38, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:24, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Propose deletion: This is just an overly specific variation of {{ In-universe}} and redundant to it, as it has "subject" parameter. I also nominate the following templates for the same reason:
{{In-universe/Star Trek}}
→ {{In-universe|subject=Star Trek|category=Star Trek}}
{{In-universe|subject=Star Trek}}
{{In-universe|category=Star Trek}}
to an article will place it in
Category:Star Trek articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction. The "subject" parameter, which I mentioned above, merely identifies the subject in the message box and perhaps can be removed altogether. --
Black Falcon (
talk)
02:26, 5 March 2011 (UTC){{In-universe/Star Trek}}
with {{In-universe|category=Star Trek}}
. The documentation for {{
In-universe}} was incomplete, however, but I have attempted to improve it by restoring usage instructions pertaining to the three optional parameters. --
Black Falcon (
talk)
05:13, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
{{In-universe/<foo>}}
to {{In-universe|<foo>}}
is a very, very simple edit. It just requires adding the code to identify and categorize by that unnamed parameter. Leaving it as "1" just requires a single pipe. If page type is to supersede that, the edit would need 2 pipes and the additional coding should be in place at the same time. -
J Greb (
talk)
16:54, 12 March 2011 (UTC)The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:56, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
The Muslim Guild has gone away. Superseded by {{ WPIslam-invite}}. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:21, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was 'delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 01:23, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Old, unused template. Purpose unclear. Near impossible to decipher this spaghetti code. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:18, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:57, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
Superseded by {{ Shaivism}}. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:53, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:57, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
Unused. Superseded by {{ Super Robot Wars}}. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:06, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:22, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Informative template, but unfortunately with an unclear scope. Where would it be placed? Also unsourced and unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:04, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:40, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
Unused. WP:NENAN - only two articles. — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:53, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete, but please do userfy or revive if there is consensus to put it to use. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:16, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
No longer used by the CfD process; see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion#How to use Cfd. No longer needed. — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:51, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:59, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
I don't think the channels transmitted by a particular pay TV service represents a close topic navigation (per WP:NAVBOX). For example, how many different pay TV services would transmit National Geographic Channel? What if they all had navboxes on that article? There would be too many. Template currently unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:45, 4 March 2011 (UTC)