The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:48, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Navigation template fails several tests: There is no article on the topic of the template, the topics do not refer to each other to a reasonable extent, the subject of the template is not mentioned in each article. Binksternet ( talk) 23:39, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:32, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
This is an unnecessary level of abstraction as only one template ({{ infobox rally}}) uses this code for its styling. Predates the general unification of infobox styling under the {{ infobox}} system. Can simply be substituted on the one calling template to remove all transclusions before deletion. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 23:27, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:32, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Hatnote. No reason to create a text-fixed variant. {{
for}}
does the job well. See, e.g., tthe one and only revert needed:
Subtalar joint. -
DePiep (
talk)
22:49, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
{{
for}}
before nominating this one here. So, whether the that page should have a hatnote or not: this specific one is superfluous. -
DePiep (
talk)
01:23, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:31, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Not useful. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:15, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Userfy. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:46, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Navbox which is full of redlinks. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:13, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Merge with YGM. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:41, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Template has no discernible use in Wikipedia oriented activities also WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK and WP:NOTTWITTER The Resident Anthropologist ( Talk / contribs) 01:57, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
{{
You've got mail|Twitter|a tweet}}
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by nominator following agreement with creator. Sebwite ( talk) 15:57, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Google Street View with
Template:Google Inc..
This navbox lists a relatively small number of articles pertaining to Google Street View. These are the only such articles on the subject. Therefore, it is more practical just to list them as a single line (group) in Google Inc. If one day, there are a significant number of more articles relating to GSV, then this could be split again into another navbox.
Sebwite (
talk)
17:43, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:48, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Navigation template fails several tests: There is no article on the topic of the template, the topics do not refer to each other to a reasonable extent, the subject of the template is not mentioned in each article. Binksternet ( talk) 23:39, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:32, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
This is an unnecessary level of abstraction as only one template ({{ infobox rally}}) uses this code for its styling. Predates the general unification of infobox styling under the {{ infobox}} system. Can simply be substituted on the one calling template to remove all transclusions before deletion. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 23:27, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:32, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Hatnote. No reason to create a text-fixed variant. {{
for}}
does the job well. See, e.g., tthe one and only revert needed:
Subtalar joint. -
DePiep (
talk)
22:49, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
{{
for}}
before nominating this one here. So, whether the that page should have a hatnote or not: this specific one is superfluous. -
DePiep (
talk)
01:23, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:31, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Not useful. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:15, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Userfy. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:46, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Navbox which is full of redlinks. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:13, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Merge with YGM. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:41, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Template has no discernible use in Wikipedia oriented activities also WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK and WP:NOTTWITTER The Resident Anthropologist ( Talk / contribs) 01:57, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
{{
You've got mail|Twitter|a tweet}}
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by nominator following agreement with creator. Sebwite ( talk) 15:57, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Google Street View with
Template:Google Inc..
This navbox lists a relatively small number of articles pertaining to Google Street View. These are the only such articles on the subject. Therefore, it is more practical just to list them as a single line (group) in Google Inc. If one day, there are a significant number of more articles relating to GSV, then this could be split again into another navbox.
Sebwite (
talk)
17:43, 21 March 2011 (UTC)