- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_ Zero 19:12, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Sheffield United has now been converted into a task force, with the assessment of its articles to be covered by WP:FOOTY via Template:WikiProject Football. Therefore, Template:WikiProject Sheffield United is now redundant and should be deleted. – Pee Jay 23:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete since it is no longer used Curb Chain ( talk) 02:28, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Redundant template. Argyle 4 Life talk 18:03, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_ Zero 18:55, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Real Madrid has now been converted into a task force, with the assessment of its articles to be covered by WP:FOOTY via Template:WikiProject Football. Therefore, Template:WikiProject Real Madrid is now redundant and should be deleted. – Pee Jay 21:49, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – Pee Jay 21:52, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Comment - Would the admin who deletes this template please copy the content from Template:WikiProject Football/sandbox to Template:WikiProject Football so that the Real Madrid articles can be assessed by that template. – Pee Jay 21:52, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete since it is no longer used Curb Chain ( talk) 02:28, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Redundant template. Argyle 4 Life talk 18:03, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close - templates were not tagged for deletion. No prejudice toward future discussion. JPG-GR ( talk) 17:32, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
- Template:911ct/Supporters/Political activists ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:911ct/Supporters/Politicians and Officials ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:911ct/Supporters/Scholars ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:911ct/list ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Old, unused navbox segments which have since been incorporated into {{ 911ct}}. — This, that, and the other (talk) 12:05, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- These are actually subgroups of the segment "Notable proponents and supporters" that have not been incorporated into
{{ 911ct}}. But they are actually unused. Cs32en Talk to me 15:10, 6 August 2011 (UTC) - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 02:56, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
- Template:Accuracy-1911 ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
An old, unused disclaimer template. The amboxes {{ POV}} (or the rather verbose variant {{ 1911 POV}}) can be added instead. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:56, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia:No disclaimers in articles Curb Chain ( talk) 11:04, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete, outlived its usefulness. Mackensen (talk) 13:07, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete, ditto — if it ever had any usefulness. — Robert Greer ( talk) 17:49, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Closed by nominator. It seems I misunderstood the purpose of the template. — This, that, and the other (talk) 23:00, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Generates an internal link. Not needed. Not useful as a typing aid for substitution, either, because of the length of the template name. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:49, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- This appears to be part of the template:s-rail ecosystem but apparently unused (so normally other templates call it). Mackensen (talk) 13:08, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Since you don't seem to understand how this template is used, you would not know that all the Adelaide Metro S-line templates in the Category:Adelaide Metro rail succession templates, which are also orphaned and unused, should be deleted as well. Any rail succession boxes that use those will not function properly without this one. The TransAdelaide templates, under the same category, function differently. Secondarywaltz ( talk) 16:40, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus to support deletion. JPG-GR ( talk) 17:30, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
- Template:Afdund ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Superseded by {{ subst:UND|afd}}. — This, that, and the other (talk) 08:06, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Comment the TfD notice was placed on the documentation page rather than the template page. I've now moved it to the template page. I have no opinion about the deletion or otherwise of this template. Thryduulf ( talk) 10:23, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - the template was not precisely superseded by {{ subst:UND|afd}}, but rather, used to create it. Therefore, for attribution purposes, it should at least be redirected to {{ subst:UND|afd}}. However, keeping it allows for continued use on user talk pages (as I have used it before in the past), whereas {{ subst:UND|afd}}'s wording no longer fits that bill. Improving the template's categorization would make it more accessible for this purpose. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 12:26, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Furthermore, it turns out that use of this template is actually still welcomed at the bottom of Template:Editnotices/Group/Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 18:19, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 02:57, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Old squad template (apparently for the Allen Wranglers' 2010 season) covered in redlinks. Superseded by {{ Allen Wranglers roster}}. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:32, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- delete old and no longer needed. Frietjes ( talk) 22:00, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 02:57, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Not used. Seemingly not needed. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:21, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 02:58, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Another "concordance of links" navbox. Linking in the Assyrian Church of the East article is sufficient. Unused; unneeded. — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:14, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 02:58, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
An old version of {{ Azadegan League seasons}}. Not needed anymore. — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:11, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- delete old and no longer needed. Frietjes ( talk) 22:00, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted by our hard-working admin Athaenara ( talk · contribs) per WP:G7 (author request). — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:22, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Template:AmbassadorWelcome ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
I made this template for Wikipedia Ambassadors, but they have deprecated it. It is used on a small number of talk pages, but I suppose I could find those pages and put something else there. Meanwhile, since it is deprecated, it has no reason to exist. Please delete.. – Ling.Nut (talk) 01:01, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_ Zero 19:12, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Sheffield United has now been converted into a task force, with the assessment of its articles to be covered by WP:FOOTY via Template:WikiProject Football. Therefore, Template:WikiProject Sheffield United is now redundant and should be deleted. – Pee Jay 23:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete since it is no longer used Curb Chain ( talk) 02:28, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Redundant template. Argyle 4 Life talk 18:03, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_ Zero 18:55, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Real Madrid has now been converted into a task force, with the assessment of its articles to be covered by WP:FOOTY via Template:WikiProject Football. Therefore, Template:WikiProject Real Madrid is now redundant and should be deleted. – Pee Jay 21:49, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – Pee Jay 21:52, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Comment - Would the admin who deletes this template please copy the content from Template:WikiProject Football/sandbox to Template:WikiProject Football so that the Real Madrid articles can be assessed by that template. – Pee Jay 21:52, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete since it is no longer used Curb Chain ( talk) 02:28, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Redundant template. Argyle 4 Life talk 18:03, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close - templates were not tagged for deletion. No prejudice toward future discussion. JPG-GR ( talk) 17:32, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
- Template:911ct/Supporters/Political activists ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:911ct/Supporters/Politicians and Officials ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:911ct/Supporters/Scholars ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:911ct/list ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Old, unused navbox segments which have since been incorporated into {{ 911ct}}. — This, that, and the other (talk) 12:05, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- These are actually subgroups of the segment "Notable proponents and supporters" that have not been incorporated into
{{ 911ct}}. But they are actually unused. Cs32en Talk to me 15:10, 6 August 2011 (UTC) - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 02:56, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
- Template:Accuracy-1911 ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
An old, unused disclaimer template. The amboxes {{ POV}} (or the rather verbose variant {{ 1911 POV}}) can be added instead. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:56, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia:No disclaimers in articles Curb Chain ( talk) 11:04, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete, outlived its usefulness. Mackensen (talk) 13:07, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete, ditto — if it ever had any usefulness. — Robert Greer ( talk) 17:49, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Closed by nominator. It seems I misunderstood the purpose of the template. — This, that, and the other (talk) 23:00, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Generates an internal link. Not needed. Not useful as a typing aid for substitution, either, because of the length of the template name. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:49, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- This appears to be part of the template:s-rail ecosystem but apparently unused (so normally other templates call it). Mackensen (talk) 13:08, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Since you don't seem to understand how this template is used, you would not know that all the Adelaide Metro S-line templates in the Category:Adelaide Metro rail succession templates, which are also orphaned and unused, should be deleted as well. Any rail succession boxes that use those will not function properly without this one. The TransAdelaide templates, under the same category, function differently. Secondarywaltz ( talk) 16:40, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus to support deletion. JPG-GR ( talk) 17:30, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
- Template:Afdund ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Superseded by {{ subst:UND|afd}}. — This, that, and the other (talk) 08:06, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Comment the TfD notice was placed on the documentation page rather than the template page. I've now moved it to the template page. I have no opinion about the deletion or otherwise of this template. Thryduulf ( talk) 10:23, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - the template was not precisely superseded by {{ subst:UND|afd}}, but rather, used to create it. Therefore, for attribution purposes, it should at least be redirected to {{ subst:UND|afd}}. However, keeping it allows for continued use on user talk pages (as I have used it before in the past), whereas {{ subst:UND|afd}}'s wording no longer fits that bill. Improving the template's categorization would make it more accessible for this purpose. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 12:26, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Furthermore, it turns out that use of this template is actually still welcomed at the bottom of Template:Editnotices/Group/Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 18:19, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 02:57, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Old squad template (apparently for the Allen Wranglers' 2010 season) covered in redlinks. Superseded by {{ Allen Wranglers roster}}. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:32, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- delete old and no longer needed. Frietjes ( talk) 22:00, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 02:57, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Not used. Seemingly not needed. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:21, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 02:58, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Another "concordance of links" navbox. Linking in the Assyrian Church of the East article is sufficient. Unused; unneeded. — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:14, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 02:58, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
An old version of {{ Azadegan League seasons}}. Not needed anymore. — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:11, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- delete old and no longer needed. Frietjes ( talk) 22:00, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted by our hard-working admin Athaenara ( talk · contribs) per WP:G7 (author request). — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:22, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Template:AmbassadorWelcome ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
I made this template for Wikipedia Ambassadors, but they have deprecated it. It is used on a small number of talk pages, but I suppose I could find those pages and put something else there. Meanwhile, since it is deprecated, it has no reason to exist. Please delete.. – Ling.Nut (talk) 01:01, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.