< October 19 | October 21 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:09, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Those songs and albums have nothing in common besides the same title. Any utility? Bisbis ( talk) 23:58, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:06, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Delete - single-purpose infobox used on a single article which is proposed for deletion. 「 ダイノガイ 千?!」 ? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 23:07, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:06, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Only used in two articles, and replaceable with {{ Infobox athlete}}. Forks based on nationality are an inherantly bad idea. PC78 ( talk) 21:01, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:06, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Used in just 39 articles, and redundant to {{ Infobox person}}: "Phd" is equivalent to either "education" or "alma mater", "Djob" and "Pjob" are equivalent to "occupation", and "Affiliates" is equivalent to "organization". PC78 ( talk) 19:31, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:35, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Infobox performer with
Template:Infobox person.
Used in just 68 articles. The only unique parameter here is "genre" which is in part being misused for occupations, but we can easily add this to {{
Infobox person}} where it would undoubtably have wider applications.
PC78 (
talk)
19:11, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:58, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Uw-number1 with
Template:Uw-unsourced1.
Propose merging
Template:Uw-number2 with
Template:Uw-unsourced2.
Propose merging
Template:Uw-number3 with
Template:Uw-unsourced3.
With no disrespect for the effort that went into creating this template, I think the very new Uw-number templates are redundant to the Uw-unsourced templates. There are infinite possibilities for expansion along this line (unsourced changes to tables, titles, names, templates, references, equations, quotations,...anything). But the remainder of the template is the same as Uw-unsourced, because there is nothing different in the manner Wikipedia guidelines treat unsourced changes to numbers versus anything else. There are no more specific links to provide, and no more specific guidance to give. While flexibility to be specific can be nice, I'm concerned that many users have abandoned using more specific templates in favor of vandalismX or huggleX templates, I think as a reaction to an increasingly overwhelming choice of uw templates with which to become familiar. I think that being very guarded about potential redundancy is the best way to keep the system simple enough to encourage use but communicate the right information. If there's anything innovative or critical that can be merged or introduced with a parser function, I would encourage it, but otherwise, I propose redirecting.
Bsherr (
talk)
13:33, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Keep for now pending future use, but if it continues to be unused I would anticipate renomination within a few months. -- RL0919 ( talk) 14:38, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Has never been used. — Edokter • Talk • 11:56, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was No consensus to delete. As an alternative, it might be appropriate to deprectate the template and then re-nominate it in the future when it is orphaned or close to it, but I leave that to the editors who have an interest in the situation. -- RL0919 ( talk) 15:11, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Redundant to {{ PD-SerbiaGov}} and {{ PD-MNEGov}}. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 23:04, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Keep, the backend has been refactored and nominator is happy with the result. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:43, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Redundant to Template:Infobox district (settlement). Frustratingly the restricted paramters arne't allowing me to add even the basic data and new svg locator map form German wiki which the standard infobox would allow. Give me one solid reason why this template isn't redundant?
Look at my example at Ostvorpommern. See how much better it looks than Demmin (district). Ten times better. I am open to a wrapper and keeping this as long as it looks and has the parameter freedom of the Ostvorpommern example but it is still redundant.♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:33, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Wrapper is fine by me. The sooner though the yellow maps are replaced with the quality ones the better!♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:26, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Airplaneman ✈ 19:48, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Seldom used template; {{ PD-US}} suffices with an explanation that the image is from the Catholic encyclopedia printed before 1923. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 01:22, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was withdrawn by the nominator. This template apparently has another column, named "Contract", so it is likely a useful template. Hey Mid ( contributions) 17:23, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Redundant to Template:Player4. Why is this one needed? Hey Mid ( contributions) 15:33, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
The Player7 template allows a player's contracted team to be shown in the template. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doh286 ( talk • contribs) 17:30, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Players on each AHL team are signed to different contracts. A player can be signed to a NHL contract, AHL contract or an ECHL contract. Doh286 ( talk) 18:18, 10 October 2010 (UTC).
|AHL = y
, then {{ #if: {{{AHL}}} | }}
, and enter in the codes in {{
Player7}}. But I'm unfortunately not the best code writer in here...
lil2mas (
talk)
21:47, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep Peter Karlsen ( talk) 03:14, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Only 1 transclusion. Contains only one blue-link. Magioladitis ( talk) 14:47, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
< October 19 | October 21 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:09, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Those songs and albums have nothing in common besides the same title. Any utility? Bisbis ( talk) 23:58, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:06, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Delete - single-purpose infobox used on a single article which is proposed for deletion. 「 ダイノガイ 千?!」 ? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 23:07, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:06, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Only used in two articles, and replaceable with {{ Infobox athlete}}. Forks based on nationality are an inherantly bad idea. PC78 ( talk) 21:01, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:06, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Used in just 39 articles, and redundant to {{ Infobox person}}: "Phd" is equivalent to either "education" or "alma mater", "Djob" and "Pjob" are equivalent to "occupation", and "Affiliates" is equivalent to "organization". PC78 ( talk) 19:31, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:35, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Infobox performer with
Template:Infobox person.
Used in just 68 articles. The only unique parameter here is "genre" which is in part being misused for occupations, but we can easily add this to {{
Infobox person}} where it would undoubtably have wider applications.
PC78 (
talk)
19:11, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:58, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Uw-number1 with
Template:Uw-unsourced1.
Propose merging
Template:Uw-number2 with
Template:Uw-unsourced2.
Propose merging
Template:Uw-number3 with
Template:Uw-unsourced3.
With no disrespect for the effort that went into creating this template, I think the very new Uw-number templates are redundant to the Uw-unsourced templates. There are infinite possibilities for expansion along this line (unsourced changes to tables, titles, names, templates, references, equations, quotations,...anything). But the remainder of the template is the same as Uw-unsourced, because there is nothing different in the manner Wikipedia guidelines treat unsourced changes to numbers versus anything else. There are no more specific links to provide, and no more specific guidance to give. While flexibility to be specific can be nice, I'm concerned that many users have abandoned using more specific templates in favor of vandalismX or huggleX templates, I think as a reaction to an increasingly overwhelming choice of uw templates with which to become familiar. I think that being very guarded about potential redundancy is the best way to keep the system simple enough to encourage use but communicate the right information. If there's anything innovative or critical that can be merged or introduced with a parser function, I would encourage it, but otherwise, I propose redirecting.
Bsherr (
talk)
13:33, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Keep for now pending future use, but if it continues to be unused I would anticipate renomination within a few months. -- RL0919 ( talk) 14:38, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Has never been used. — Edokter • Talk • 11:56, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was No consensus to delete. As an alternative, it might be appropriate to deprectate the template and then re-nominate it in the future when it is orphaned or close to it, but I leave that to the editors who have an interest in the situation. -- RL0919 ( talk) 15:11, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Redundant to {{ PD-SerbiaGov}} and {{ PD-MNEGov}}. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 23:04, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Keep, the backend has been refactored and nominator is happy with the result. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:43, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Redundant to Template:Infobox district (settlement). Frustratingly the restricted paramters arne't allowing me to add even the basic data and new svg locator map form German wiki which the standard infobox would allow. Give me one solid reason why this template isn't redundant?
Look at my example at Ostvorpommern. See how much better it looks than Demmin (district). Ten times better. I am open to a wrapper and keeping this as long as it looks and has the parameter freedom of the Ostvorpommern example but it is still redundant.♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:33, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Wrapper is fine by me. The sooner though the yellow maps are replaced with the quality ones the better!♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:26, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Airplaneman ✈ 19:48, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Seldom used template; {{ PD-US}} suffices with an explanation that the image is from the Catholic encyclopedia printed before 1923. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 01:22, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was withdrawn by the nominator. This template apparently has another column, named "Contract", so it is likely a useful template. Hey Mid ( contributions) 17:23, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Redundant to Template:Player4. Why is this one needed? Hey Mid ( contributions) 15:33, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
The Player7 template allows a player's contracted team to be shown in the template. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doh286 ( talk • contribs) 17:30, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Players on each AHL team are signed to different contracts. A player can be signed to a NHL contract, AHL contract or an ECHL contract. Doh286 ( talk) 18:18, 10 October 2010 (UTC).
|AHL = y
, then {{ #if: {{{AHL}}} | }}
, and enter in the codes in {{
Player7}}. But I'm unfortunately not the best code writer in here...
lil2mas (
talk)
21:47, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep Peter Karlsen ( talk) 03:14, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Only 1 transclusion. Contains only one blue-link. Magioladitis ( talk) 14:47, 11 October 2010 (UTC)