< November 2 | November 4 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was delete. — ξ xplicit 01:13, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Only used on one article. Other Judoka articles are using {{ Infobox martial artist}} WOSlinker ( talk) 23:36, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete both. — ξ xplicit 01:13, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Unused templates in article mainspaces, only in talk pages. Also, not beneficial templates as they don't elucidate anything. Jrcla2 ( talk) 21:59, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — ξ xplicit 01:13, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
No parent article for Graphic Smash. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 19:57, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — ξ xplicit 01:13, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Not many links, only used in two articles, hence it has limited usefulness. Seems rather premature for a band that has yet to release anything. PC78 ( talk) 19:21, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:52, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
redundant: only red links Artiquities ( talk) 04:47, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Delete per nom -- Extra 999 ( Contact me + contribs) 01:41, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was deleted under G7 speedy deletion criterion by Athaenara ( talk · contribs). Non-admin closure. ~ Super Hamster Talk Contribs 00:58, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
The purpose of this template seems to be to provide a quotation that can be transcluded into multiple articles at the same time; alas, this is rather useless and unnecessary, and serves as more of a hindrance than a helpful tool. Wikipedia:Template namespace states that "Templates should not masquerade as article content in the main article namespace; instead, place the text directly into the article", and this should not be an exception. The template is used in only one article, and it is unlikely to be used again, rendering it as useless and less efficient than simply using straight text. In addition, not only is it an irregularity, but in the event that it would have to be changed for whatever reason, the actual template would have to be edited, or replaced by the actual text - once again, that renders the template as useless. ~ Super Hamster Talk Contribs 01:56, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
< November 2 | November 4 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was delete. — ξ xplicit 01:13, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Only used on one article. Other Judoka articles are using {{ Infobox martial artist}} WOSlinker ( talk) 23:36, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete both. — ξ xplicit 01:13, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Unused templates in article mainspaces, only in talk pages. Also, not beneficial templates as they don't elucidate anything. Jrcla2 ( talk) 21:59, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — ξ xplicit 01:13, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
No parent article for Graphic Smash. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 19:57, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — ξ xplicit 01:13, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Not many links, only used in two articles, hence it has limited usefulness. Seems rather premature for a band that has yet to release anything. PC78 ( talk) 19:21, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:52, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
redundant: only red links Artiquities ( talk) 04:47, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Delete per nom -- Extra 999 ( Contact me + contribs) 01:41, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was deleted under G7 speedy deletion criterion by Athaenara ( talk · contribs). Non-admin closure. ~ Super Hamster Talk Contribs 00:58, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
The purpose of this template seems to be to provide a quotation that can be transcluded into multiple articles at the same time; alas, this is rather useless and unnecessary, and serves as more of a hindrance than a helpful tool. Wikipedia:Template namespace states that "Templates should not masquerade as article content in the main article namespace; instead, place the text directly into the article", and this should not be an exception. The template is used in only one article, and it is unlikely to be used again, rendering it as useless and less efficient than simply using straight text. In addition, not only is it an irregularity, but in the event that it would have to be changed for whatever reason, the actual template would have to be edited, or replaced by the actual text - once again, that renders the template as useless. ~ Super Hamster Talk Contribs 01:56, 3 November 2010 (UTC)