The result of the discussion was Speedy delete as superceded by switch statement in {{ NJT line ndir}} Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:43, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned templates Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:35, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete as superceded by switch statement in {{ NJT line pdir}} Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:43, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned templates Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:30, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 ( talk) 17:28, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned templates, which are largely redundant to the information already appearing in the infobox in British Rail Class 66. Any useful additional information should be merged there. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:10, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. The consensus of the discussion is that Quebec English is a regional variant of Canadian English that does not differ in many ways that would be significant for writing encyclopedia articles. Note: After deleting the template I intend to recreate the page as a redirect to Template:Canadian English, so the link will still be blue. RL0919 ( talk) 17:19, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Delete: This template is redundant there is already a template for this. It is at Template:Canadian English . Having a template for each reigon of Canada is redundant and unnessisary. There are not seperate templates for reigons of the United States, and even though there are different dialects in the United States the template Template:American English is enough. Alpha Quadrant ( talk) 20:27, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 ( talk) 18:13, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Unused and broken— calls non-existant {{ Prettytable-BS}} (although that is probably just a prettytable template on another wiki) -— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 13:23, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 ( talk) 18:12, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
(deletion request missing here ... difflink 1, difflink 2)
The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 ( talk) 18:12, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Unused and broken— calls non-existant {{ Prettytable-BS}} -— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 13:15, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Keep for now Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:29, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
(Virtually) unused, deprecated. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 03:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 ( talk) 17:55, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Against the guideline WP:NDA, not really used, and lacks categories. SaMi ✉ 13:00, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete as superceded by switch statement in {{ NJT line ndir}} Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:43, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned templates Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:35, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete as superceded by switch statement in {{ NJT line pdir}} Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:43, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned templates Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:30, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 ( talk) 17:28, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned templates, which are largely redundant to the information already appearing in the infobox in British Rail Class 66. Any useful additional information should be merged there. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:10, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. The consensus of the discussion is that Quebec English is a regional variant of Canadian English that does not differ in many ways that would be significant for writing encyclopedia articles. Note: After deleting the template I intend to recreate the page as a redirect to Template:Canadian English, so the link will still be blue. RL0919 ( talk) 17:19, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Delete: This template is redundant there is already a template for this. It is at Template:Canadian English . Having a template for each reigon of Canada is redundant and unnessisary. There are not seperate templates for reigons of the United States, and even though there are different dialects in the United States the template Template:American English is enough. Alpha Quadrant ( talk) 20:27, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 ( talk) 18:13, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Unused and broken— calls non-existant {{ Prettytable-BS}} (although that is probably just a prettytable template on another wiki) -— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 13:23, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 ( talk) 18:12, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
(deletion request missing here ... difflink 1, difflink 2)
The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 ( talk) 18:12, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Unused and broken— calls non-existant {{ Prettytable-BS}} -— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 13:15, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Keep for now Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:29, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
(Virtually) unused, deprecated. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 03:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 ( talk) 17:55, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Against the guideline WP:NDA, not really used, and lacks categories. SaMi ✉ 13:00, 28 April 2010 (UTC)