The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:58, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
This is a navbox that appears at the bottom of each of the universities listed on it. While I have nothing against women's fencing, it doesn't seem to me to merit being a navbox on each school's page. If we were to list the associations for every sport or activity at each school, the number of navboxes would be ridiculous. Also, I don't think that this navbox is really adding any useful information to the article (is it really necessary to be able to navigate between schools based on their fencing league by using a navbox?). Its information is more suited as a category than a navbox. CapitalR ( talk) 23:34, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
delete it would be too unwieldy to have templates for every single collegiate sport association. Astuishin ( talk) 06:33, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:59, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Unused template. Functions better served by {{ Infobox road}} and {{ Infobox road small}}. — Fredddie ™ 23:04, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:01, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Unused, redundant of {{ Web colors}} and {{ Shades of green}}. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 21:33, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Redirect to {{ Shades of grey}}. A template that presets certain parameters and passes them through to another template can be a valid configuration, but the discussion below indicates that this is not seen as helpful in this particular case. RL0919 ( talk) 22:14, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Deliberately redundant of {{ Shades of grey}}. Simply make {{Shades of grey|us}} to display American English spellings. Looking at that template's source (it has no documentation), this option is already present. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 21:31, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
{{Shades of grey}}
per
WP:ENGVAR.The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:03, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Unused. Svick ( talk) 13:26, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:05, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Unused, Entourage episodes don't have their own articles. Svick ( talk) 13:23, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 21:55, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
The rationale given on the talk page explains it well. A template is not an appropriate way to hold this information; it's arbitrary, less presentable than well-written prose, and clunky. Recommended action: subst and delete. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 12:52, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:22, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
User intention to delete. Appears to be no longer active. Haruth ( talk) 10:48, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:06, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Proposed new system for IPA markup which hasn't gone anywhere since its proposal four years ago. Unused. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 10:22, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:06, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
The 2008 Champions League Twenty20 never took place due to the Mumbai bombings so template seems a little unnecessary Jevansen ( talk) 07:10, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 22:04, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Templates of limited use which could be replaced by a simple wikitable listing the retired players. If this sort of thing is desired, then why not use a unified "retired number template" like MLBBioRet? Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:07, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete by Fastily Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:18, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned template, most likely redundant to one of the roads templates. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:48, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 22:02, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned template, most likely redundant to something else, or it would be in use? Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:43, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete by Graeme Bartlett. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:46, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Old orphaned test template, which is redundant to {{ Infobox U.S. state}} Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:37, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per author approval Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:19, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned and redundant to {{ Infobox U.S. state}}. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:35, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:21, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Reason #2 - unused template redundant to Template:Infobox New Zealand suburbs. XLerate ( talk) 01:55, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was No consensus. It is common for single-use templates to be substituted and then deleted, but a there is a concern that in this instance that would put too much code into the article. No policy is at stake and the discussion does not clearly favor one side or the other, plus the length of time this has already been listed suggests that relisting would not be helpful. RL0919 ( talk) 22:37, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Template only used on a single page, pretty much making it useless. The map/information can be added within the relevant article. JohnnyPolo24 ( talk) 16:53, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:58, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
This is a navbox that appears at the bottom of each of the universities listed on it. While I have nothing against women's fencing, it doesn't seem to me to merit being a navbox on each school's page. If we were to list the associations for every sport or activity at each school, the number of navboxes would be ridiculous. Also, I don't think that this navbox is really adding any useful information to the article (is it really necessary to be able to navigate between schools based on their fencing league by using a navbox?). Its information is more suited as a category than a navbox. CapitalR ( talk) 23:34, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
delete it would be too unwieldy to have templates for every single collegiate sport association. Astuishin ( talk) 06:33, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:59, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Unused template. Functions better served by {{ Infobox road}} and {{ Infobox road small}}. — Fredddie ™ 23:04, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:01, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Unused, redundant of {{ Web colors}} and {{ Shades of green}}. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 21:33, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Redirect to {{ Shades of grey}}. A template that presets certain parameters and passes them through to another template can be a valid configuration, but the discussion below indicates that this is not seen as helpful in this particular case. RL0919 ( talk) 22:14, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Deliberately redundant of {{ Shades of grey}}. Simply make {{Shades of grey|us}} to display American English spellings. Looking at that template's source (it has no documentation), this option is already present. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 21:31, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
{{Shades of grey}}
per
WP:ENGVAR.The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:03, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Unused. Svick ( talk) 13:26, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:05, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Unused, Entourage episodes don't have their own articles. Svick ( talk) 13:23, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 21:55, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
The rationale given on the talk page explains it well. A template is not an appropriate way to hold this information; it's arbitrary, less presentable than well-written prose, and clunky. Recommended action: subst and delete. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 12:52, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:22, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
User intention to delete. Appears to be no longer active. Haruth ( talk) 10:48, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:06, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Proposed new system for IPA markup which hasn't gone anywhere since its proposal four years ago. Unused. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 10:22, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:06, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
The 2008 Champions League Twenty20 never took place due to the Mumbai bombings so template seems a little unnecessary Jevansen ( talk) 07:10, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 22:04, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Templates of limited use which could be replaced by a simple wikitable listing the retired players. If this sort of thing is desired, then why not use a unified "retired number template" like MLBBioRet? Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:07, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete by Fastily Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:18, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned template, most likely redundant to one of the roads templates. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:48, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 22:02, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned template, most likely redundant to something else, or it would be in use? Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:43, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete by Graeme Bartlett. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:46, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Old orphaned test template, which is redundant to {{ Infobox U.S. state}} Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:37, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per author approval Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:19, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned and redundant to {{ Infobox U.S. state}}. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:35, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:21, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Reason #2 - unused template redundant to Template:Infobox New Zealand suburbs. XLerate ( talk) 01:55, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was No consensus. It is common for single-use templates to be substituted and then deleted, but a there is a concern that in this instance that would put too much code into the article. No policy is at stake and the discussion does not clearly favor one side or the other, plus the length of time this has already been listed suggests that relisting would not be helpful. RL0919 ( talk) 22:37, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Template only used on a single page, pretty much making it useless. The map/information can be added within the relevant article. JohnnyPolo24 ( talk) 16:53, 16 April 2010 (UTC)