The result of the debate was keep Woohookitty Woohoo! 04:28, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Commercial air travel is just too diverse a topic to be able to able to cram into a template, there seems to be no arbitrary inclusion criteria in the template, which is best served by use of categories and inter-wiki links from articles themselves. Россавиа Диалог 21:02, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep: Templates like this one are a valuable resource for letting other readers know what related topics exist in an organized fashion. Unlike what the nom says, they cram pages a lot less than a see also section, which can only list a limited number of articles. Templates like these are readymade, and can be placed at the bottom of a page with a few keystrokes, rather than having to determine from multiple, incoherent lists of hundreds of thousands of articles which ones belong interlinked. These templates also allow other readers and editors to know of the existence of other articles that may otherwise go unnoticed, thereby enabling articles that could otherwise remain one-line stubs for years opportunities for improvement. This particular template is a collection of articles pertaining solely to universal concepts in commercial air travel, and is limited as such. It is not intended to include any specific airlines or countries, as that would be too much to list. The guideline as to what types of articles should or should not be included in this template are written in the hidden text, thereby letting others who wish to add anything know about it. Sebwite ( talk) 23:38, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was already deleted by User:Pascal.Tesson (no reason given?). JPG-GR ( talk) 19:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Not a template. A non-notable band article.. MBisanz talk 16:42, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Speedy delete An attempt to upload an article with the Template: prefix. Anyway, the band would be deleted under WP:CSD#A7 so there's little need to keep it around much longer. PeterSymonds | talk 17:16, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Speedy delete non-notable article in the wrong namespace J ɪ m p 01:00, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:49, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Superseded by standard Navbox. — Darwinek ( talk) 16:15, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:53, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Appears to be redundant and not used anywhere.. h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 13:36, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete Woohookitty Woohoo! 04:40, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Redundant and superseded by {{ Asia topic}} as {{Asia topic|Law enforcement in}}; I honestly don't know if this should be deleted, or if it can be redirected to the "Law enforcement in" selector or what. I'm open to suggestions. — - Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 05:58, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
{{{{{1}}} topic|Law enforcement in}}
.
J
ɪ
m
p
00:57, 28 March 2008 (UTC)The result of the debate was delete. Will replace with Foreign relations of templates Woohookitty Woohoo! 04:44, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Don't match others of this kind, has many links to articles which don't have PR China or India or Croatia as the main subject (regions or international groups), replaced by {{ Foreign relations of the People's Republic of China}}, {{ Foreign relations of India}}, etc. See for example: {{ Canada ties}} which was deleted and replaced by {{ Foreign relations of Canada}}. Mostly these are glorified "see also" sections, not a real navbox at all. — Kevlar67 ( talk) 22:48, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was keep Woohookitty Woohoo! 04:28, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Commercial air travel is just too diverse a topic to be able to able to cram into a template, there seems to be no arbitrary inclusion criteria in the template, which is best served by use of categories and inter-wiki links from articles themselves. Россавиа Диалог 21:02, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep: Templates like this one are a valuable resource for letting other readers know what related topics exist in an organized fashion. Unlike what the nom says, they cram pages a lot less than a see also section, which can only list a limited number of articles. Templates like these are readymade, and can be placed at the bottom of a page with a few keystrokes, rather than having to determine from multiple, incoherent lists of hundreds of thousands of articles which ones belong interlinked. These templates also allow other readers and editors to know of the existence of other articles that may otherwise go unnoticed, thereby enabling articles that could otherwise remain one-line stubs for years opportunities for improvement. This particular template is a collection of articles pertaining solely to universal concepts in commercial air travel, and is limited as such. It is not intended to include any specific airlines or countries, as that would be too much to list. The guideline as to what types of articles should or should not be included in this template are written in the hidden text, thereby letting others who wish to add anything know about it. Sebwite ( talk) 23:38, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was already deleted by User:Pascal.Tesson (no reason given?). JPG-GR ( talk) 19:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Not a template. A non-notable band article.. MBisanz talk 16:42, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Speedy delete An attempt to upload an article with the Template: prefix. Anyway, the band would be deleted under WP:CSD#A7 so there's little need to keep it around much longer. PeterSymonds | talk 17:16, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Speedy delete non-notable article in the wrong namespace J ɪ m p 01:00, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:49, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Superseded by standard Navbox. — Darwinek ( talk) 16:15, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:53, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Appears to be redundant and not used anywhere.. h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 13:36, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete Woohookitty Woohoo! 04:40, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Redundant and superseded by {{ Asia topic}} as {{Asia topic|Law enforcement in}}; I honestly don't know if this should be deleted, or if it can be redirected to the "Law enforcement in" selector or what. I'm open to suggestions. — - Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 05:58, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
{{{{{1}}} topic|Law enforcement in}}
.
J
ɪ
m
p
00:57, 28 March 2008 (UTC)The result of the debate was delete. Will replace with Foreign relations of templates Woohookitty Woohoo! 04:44, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Don't match others of this kind, has many links to articles which don't have PR China or India or Croatia as the main subject (regions or international groups), replaced by {{ Foreign relations of the People's Republic of China}}, {{ Foreign relations of India}}, etc. See for example: {{ Canada ties}} which was deleted and replaced by {{ Foreign relations of Canada}}. Mostly these are glorified "see also" sections, not a real navbox at all. — Kevlar67 ( talk) 22:48, 18 March 2008 (UTC)