The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty Woohoo! 05:44, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
This template is now obsolete, now that I have fixed the previous stacking problem that existed with all of the Ukrainian soccer templates. Now all Ukrainian soccer templates can stack up on one another using the standard fb start-fb end code that is used to stack templates in all other soccer articles (see 2006_World_Cup#External_links for instance). The three templates nominated for deletion were created solely to stack smaller templates together and are now no longer necessary — Palffy 23:39, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty Woohoo! 08:13, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
This template is now obsolete, now that I have fixed the previous stacking problem that existed with all of the Ukrainian soccer templates. Now all Ukrainian soccer templates can stack up on one another using the standard fb start-fb end code that is used to stack templates in all other soccer articles (see 2006_World_Cup#External_links for instance). The three templates nominated for deletion were created solely to stack smaller templates together and are now no longer necessary — Palffy 23:39, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty Woohoo! 08:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
This template is now obsolete, now that I have fixed the previous stacking problem that existed with all of the Ukrainian soccer templates. Now all Ukrainian soccer templates can stack up on one another using the standard fb start-fb end code that is used to stack templates in all other soccer articles (see 2006_World_Cup#External_links for instance). The three templates nominated for deletion were created solely to stack smaller templates together and are now no longer necessary — Palffy 23:39, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty Woohoo! 05:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
First, this is an article, not a template. Second, it's a cut and paste from African American#Who is African American?, with the phrase "Black American" substituted for "African American". (One subsection was deleted from African American since the cut and paste.) This "template"/article is not in use, and it probably never will be used. It should be deleted. — Malik Shabazz | Talk 21:38, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty Woohoo! 05:20, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Based on a rejected proposed policy ( WP:NATIVE), and seems to be based on a POV about which North American native groups' claims of tribal membership are legitimate. Where verifiability of sources is a concern, this template is redundant as there are plenty of "citation needed" templates already. — alanyst / talk/ 13:29, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty Woohoo! 08:18, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
First, self-reference. Second, asserts that a given NPOV dispute is irreconcilable. Third, used on only one page ( Sufism). I suggest deletion and replacement with usual POV template. — Stlemur 10:57, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Speedy Delete, this is housekeeping stuff here. ^ demon [omg plz] 19:14, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned and deprecated — Crashintome4196 06:38, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was keep. Woohookitty Woohoo! 08:16, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
badly designed, the box overrides text, at least on my IE computer. More seriously, this appears only on category pages, and should be systematically replaced by Category:European mathematicians or Category:European mathematicians by nationality. If there are parallel templates, they should be added to this nomination. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 04:53, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty Woohoo! 05:44, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
This template is now obsolete, now that I have fixed the previous stacking problem that existed with all of the Ukrainian soccer templates. Now all Ukrainian soccer templates can stack up on one another using the standard fb start-fb end code that is used to stack templates in all other soccer articles (see 2006_World_Cup#External_links for instance). The three templates nominated for deletion were created solely to stack smaller templates together and are now no longer necessary — Palffy 23:39, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty Woohoo! 08:13, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
This template is now obsolete, now that I have fixed the previous stacking problem that existed with all of the Ukrainian soccer templates. Now all Ukrainian soccer templates can stack up on one another using the standard fb start-fb end code that is used to stack templates in all other soccer articles (see 2006_World_Cup#External_links for instance). The three templates nominated for deletion were created solely to stack smaller templates together and are now no longer necessary — Palffy 23:39, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty Woohoo! 08:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
This template is now obsolete, now that I have fixed the previous stacking problem that existed with all of the Ukrainian soccer templates. Now all Ukrainian soccer templates can stack up on one another using the standard fb start-fb end code that is used to stack templates in all other soccer articles (see 2006_World_Cup#External_links for instance). The three templates nominated for deletion were created solely to stack smaller templates together and are now no longer necessary — Palffy 23:39, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty Woohoo! 05:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
First, this is an article, not a template. Second, it's a cut and paste from African American#Who is African American?, with the phrase "Black American" substituted for "African American". (One subsection was deleted from African American since the cut and paste.) This "template"/article is not in use, and it probably never will be used. It should be deleted. — Malik Shabazz | Talk 21:38, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty Woohoo! 05:20, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Based on a rejected proposed policy ( WP:NATIVE), and seems to be based on a POV about which North American native groups' claims of tribal membership are legitimate. Where verifiability of sources is a concern, this template is redundant as there are plenty of "citation needed" templates already. — alanyst / talk/ 13:29, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty Woohoo! 08:18, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
First, self-reference. Second, asserts that a given NPOV dispute is irreconcilable. Third, used on only one page ( Sufism). I suggest deletion and replacement with usual POV template. — Stlemur 10:57, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Speedy Delete, this is housekeeping stuff here. ^ demon [omg plz] 19:14, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned and deprecated — Crashintome4196 06:38, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
The result of the debate was keep. Woohookitty Woohoo! 08:16, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
badly designed, the box overrides text, at least on my IE computer. More seriously, this appears only on category pages, and should be systematically replaced by Category:European mathematicians or Category:European mathematicians by nationality. If there are parallel templates, they should be added to this nomination. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 04:53, 15 May 2007 (UTC)