The result of the debate was Speedy deleted by Stifle ( talk • contribs • blocks • protects • deletions • moves). -- Rory096 04:16, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Template:Sig (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Most useless template ever. All it does is produce your sig, which ~~~~ does and is much shorter than {{
subst:
sig}}. Instructions on usage on its talk page says that you're supposed to enter your username, so it customizes your sig, but that is untrue- there is no parameter. Custom sigs can be created in one's preferences. --
Rory096
21:05, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
I have been both bold and unilateral, and have blanked this template, justification being left on the talk page. robchurch | talk 21:13, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Deleted -- Drini 23:46, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Template:Star Wars Portal (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
This is redundant, Template:Portal does the job already. Janizary 20:18, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Keep -- Drini 23:49, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Template:Infobox OS 2 (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Original reason for creating it (not having to modify the article it's used in) makes no sense. All it does is add confusion.
Note: delete Template:Latest_stable_release/whatever and Template:Latest_release_date/whatever also. a thing 07:34, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Keep. IceKarma ॐ 07:33, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Template:!- (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Unused template that is completely useless. Just look at the page itself.
Ricky81682 (
talk)
04:29, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
{{
!}}
-" and "{{
!}}
{{
!}}
" resp. Disadvantage of additional templates: More stuff to protect against vandals, needs a link to
Template:!(
talk
links
history) for the explanation, needs an entry on "do not subst unless you know what you're doing" lists under threat of immediate de-bot-ting, and it should be in this new
Category:Wikipedia workaround templates. How about adding <noinclude>{{
tdeprecated|use={{
!}}
-}}
</noinclude>, that could be the fastest way to deal with it. --
Omniplex
03:36, 16 June 2006 (UTC)The result of the debate was redirect to {{ DreyfusAffair}} Pagra shtak 04:38, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Template:Dreyfusaffair (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Redundant to {{
DreyfusAffair}}. The only difference is a redlink.
SeventyThree(
Talk) 04:14, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Speedy deleted by Stifle ( talk • contribs • blocks • protects • deletions • moves). -- Rory096 04:16, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Template:Sig (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Most useless template ever. All it does is produce your sig, which ~~~~ does and is much shorter than {{
subst:
sig}}. Instructions on usage on its talk page says that you're supposed to enter your username, so it customizes your sig, but that is untrue- there is no parameter. Custom sigs can be created in one's preferences. --
Rory096
21:05, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
I have been both bold and unilateral, and have blanked this template, justification being left on the talk page. robchurch | talk 21:13, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Deleted -- Drini 23:46, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Template:Star Wars Portal (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
This is redundant, Template:Portal does the job already. Janizary 20:18, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Keep -- Drini 23:49, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Template:Infobox OS 2 (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Original reason for creating it (not having to modify the article it's used in) makes no sense. All it does is add confusion.
Note: delete Template:Latest_stable_release/whatever and Template:Latest_release_date/whatever also. a thing 07:34, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Keep. IceKarma ॐ 07:33, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Template:!- (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Unused template that is completely useless. Just look at the page itself.
Ricky81682 (
talk)
04:29, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
{{
!}}
-" and "{{
!}}
{{
!}}
" resp. Disadvantage of additional templates: More stuff to protect against vandals, needs a link to
Template:!(
talk
links
history) for the explanation, needs an entry on "do not subst unless you know what you're doing" lists under threat of immediate de-bot-ting, and it should be in this new
Category:Wikipedia workaround templates. How about adding <noinclude>{{
tdeprecated|use={{
!}}
-}}
</noinclude>, that could be the fastest way to deal with it. --
Omniplex
03:36, 16 June 2006 (UTC)The result of the debate was redirect to {{ DreyfusAffair}} Pagra shtak 04:38, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Template:Dreyfusaffair (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Redundant to {{
DreyfusAffair}}. The only difference is a redlink.
SeventyThree(
Talk) 04:14, 9 June 2006 (UTC)