This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 410 | Archive 411 | Archive 412 | Archive 413 | Archive 414 | Archive 415 | → | Archive 420 |
Here is the draft about a band from Seattle called THE FAME RIOT that appears to be noteworthy. The feedback I am getting seemed to be helpful at first, but it's vague enough to confuse me. Here is the draft link: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft:The_Fame_Riot&action=submit Michael Sullivant ( talk) 01:36, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
What kinds o rights are there are Wikipedia? Is there a page about how to become one of those users to gain new privileges? Art234789 ( talk) 02:40, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
https://ta.wikipedia.org/?title=கவுண்டர் this page irritate my caste.i changed the content but one user blocked me i need to delete that page or i want to get ownership of that page?
Ranjith KonGu ( talk) 06:08, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Ranjith KonGu ( talk) 06:45, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Someone posted an incorrect birthdate on my wikipedia page and I would like it removed immediately. Please advise. Tfrancis 1 ( talk) 21:45, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
@ Tfrancis: you may also find the information at Wikipedia:Autobiography#Problems_in_an_article_about_you helpful. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:45, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Please help me to create page about our community. Before i created but was deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kulwant Ladhar ( talk • contribs) 12:23, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Someone created this page /info/en/?search=Gounder it irritate my community or caste how to delete this page?
Ranjith KonGu ( talk) 06:44, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
In the article "Lotti Golden" I noticed a Cite Error was listed on reference #42, " Cite error: The named reference Toop was invoked but never defined (see the help page)." I looked at the help page but I am still not sure how to remedy the Cite Error. Can someone be so kind as to assist me with this? Thank you! Magdalamar ( talk) 05:27, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
<ref name=Toop-2000/>
in order to invoke the other definiton. I have done this.
[2] If you want to rename one of the definitions to only be called "Toop" then you must keep the definiton text. You cannot say <ref name=Toop/>
when "Toop" is never defined.
PrimeHunter (
talk) 05:49, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Cullen, Thank you so much for responding. It's confusing as to why the error was posted in the first place. Due to the tedium involved in locating the source of the Cite Error, your suggestion to review the history until I find a version with the named reference intact is much appreciated. I will keep you posted! Magdalamar ( talk) 14:57, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
<ref>
tags in <nowiki></nowiki>
tags to avoid parser errors, e.g., <nowiki><ref></nowiki>
. —
Skyllfully (
talk |
contribs) 15:36, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Magdalamar, I have taken the liberty of moving your recent comments and the responses to them to the section of this page in which you posted your original question. It is best practice to reply to comments in the existing section, rather than starting a new one, in order to keep the discussion together. Cordless Larry ( talk) 17:42, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Although I am a newbie on Wikipedia, I can clearly find User:Delta13C is overtagging a page Nigma Talib knowingly, even there are no such issues, Can someone check his contributions. He seems to be linked with Michael Uzick, check his contribution at Draft:Michael Uzick and attacking the page with a biasness.(refer to the talk page) Please help me to understand if I need to know under Wikipedia editing policies. Perogrimadi ( talk) 19:18, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
I do not know if this topic warrants a page or not. It is my understanding that mathematical formulas cannot be the subject of copyright or proprietary information. I really do not know if this is true or not, but I know that Weight Watcher's could not keep the mathematical formula they use to determine how many points a particular food has a secret and the formula was here on Wikipedia. Anyway, Airbnb.com has this sliding scale for their commission that they charge guests. It is between 6% and 12% of whatever the host charges the guests. The guests often ask me how much the commission will be but I cannot answer this question because Airbnb.com will not tell me the formula. Is this legal? I asked if this was proprietary information and they said yes. Basically, how it works is, if the guest is paying a small amount the commission is higher, and if they are paying a lot it is lower, but they will not reveal the points at which it goes up or down. This stupid company prides itself on honesty and transparency, but that is only for the users, not for them. Is this a topic that would warrant a page or investigation. Would it even be possible to find out? (talk) 22:19, 7 November 2015
I posted this somewhere else on Wikipedia and a notice came up that said this topic warranted something(????) and other people had discussed it, but when I looked at the other stuff around it, it looked out of place. I am new to this and I am really not even sure if this is really an issue that has any merit. I just have a gut feeling it might or maybe Airbnb just annoys me and I have no point, but this place is like a maze to me, and I do not know where to post my potential input. Can you point me in the right direction? I know this is the wrong place, but I do not understand the terms here. Yes, I understand editing, but um... the other stuff mostly not.
Annforbes86 (
talk) 22:38, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you! I was just thinking about it and I was thinking it may not be the same thing as the mathematical formula as the Weight Watcher's thing because they are just keeping the point at which the percentage they charge a secret, they are not keeping the percentages a secret. Still really against what they preach... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annforbes86 ( talk • contribs) 23:05, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I have just created my first Draft article for "Lleyson Hopkin Davy"
Would any experienced Wikipedians be interested in please taking a look and helping me get the article up to speed? I have no experience in formally adding the citations etc.
Thanks in advance
note. Williams reference is a published book with many citations. London. Womens printing society. 66 Whitcomb st. Davy ref. on page 154 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davymi ( talk • contribs) 20:31, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
davymi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davymi ( talk • contribs) 10:36, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
==Early life==
how can Abusive Behavior like [3] be dealt with -- Aryan from हि है ( talk) 09:41, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi I am trying to draft and create a page for my daughter who is Hattie Gotobed - an up and coming actress. I have drafted and submitted but came back saying needs referencing. I have looked at the videos and read through but am still a little lost and would appreciate some help - ideally if someone can show me how to do the first one - what I need to do/ add etc... I could then hopefully do the rest.
Thanks very much in advance Tracy Romeha3 ( talk) 01:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Yes, shooting down the draft on grounds of bad references is correct as far as it goes, but inadequate. It points to deeper problems less likely to be fixed. Besides the problems already mentioned, there is Wikipedia:Up and coming next big thing, which can be roughly summarized as, we don't cover the up and coming. We wait until they have arrived. Jim.henderson ( talk) 14:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Would it be possible to get a digital copy of this 2015 Acm.org paper?: "Intuitive and efficient camera control with the toric space" by Christophe Lino and Marc Christie. Little bit hard to say anything useful with only the abstract at hand. It would be helpful in developing the article on virtual cinematography based on what the abstract says about it. The dl.acm.org site says it would cost me $15 but I'm not made of money. -- Redress perhaps ( talk) 14:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
New editor here. I've been making minor edits when I can. Today, I was reading the page on Korea and have noticed multiple problems and after viewing the edit history can see it is a pretty contentious page. Many other country pages have at least semi-protection to prevent this. What is the process for getting this for a page like Korea? I think it could really benefit from it. Rgallagher8 ( talk) 16:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Since I am now semi-retired, I have more time to do edits of topics of great interest to me. By and large, this is going well. Occasionally another contributor revises something that I had added; no problem.
But now I have a more significant situation. Over the weekend, I did a major edit of Rideau Hall adding quite a bit of new information, every bit with at least one citation. The individual who seems to have written most of the Rideau Hall item simply did an Undo of everything I had edited (03:40, 9 November 2015). My Talk page discusses this in detail. User talk:Peter K Burian#Rideau Hall is not the monarch's residence
I don't know if Teahouse is the correct place to raise this question, but perhaps you could lead me to the area where I could ask someone to mediate this issue. Thanks, Peter K Burian 13:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
We have templates that make this easier, such as {{
cite book}}
, {{
cite news}}
, {{
cite journal}}
and {{
cite web}}
. We also have some resources like
Wikipedia citation tool for Google Books to easily get the citation to place. Naked external links, as all your citations were, is far from ideal. Also, if you click "cite" in the toolbar above the editing window you will be provided a guided form for entry of a citation. See generally
Help:Referencing for beginners.
I can't read User:Miesianiacal's mind, and the edit summary accompanying his or her revert was opaque where it should not have been, but I believe this was at least a major factor in the revert. Fixing the citations would require quite a bit of work on another user's part. If that was the sole basis, it may be that leaving the edit, but asking you to fix the citations would have been a better route, only reverting if you did not after some sufficient time had passed. Anyway, all your edits are in the page history. You can click on the date of the version in the page history before the revert, click edit, fix your citations and save. Best regards-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 14:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC) P.s. If you need any help with understanding how to format the citations, I am happy to provide some concrete examples for you from your draft to get you started. Just drop me a line on my talk page.-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 15:13, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Why is this being asked here, behind my back (so to speak)? (I wouldn't have known about it had Fuhghettaboutit not pinged me.) Peter K's "major edit" (which it was indeed) was rife with problems; too many to cover in one edit summary. He can ask for my reasoning at my own talk page or at the article talk page, which is standard practice, per WP:BRD. -- Ħ MIESIANIACAL 18:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
This just came to my mind a few days ago. There are wikia pages dedicated to certain topics and are formatted similar to Wikipedia. For example, memory alpha is dedicated to the canon Star Trek.
Are these wikia pages by Wikipedia? Winterysteppe ( talk) 04:33, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
I declined this draft at Articles for Creation. I noted in particular that the submitter had been advised by previous reviewer User:LaMona to trim the irrelevant material out of the "Awards" section, and asked why the draft had been resubmitted with no changes. User:Aagreeny4 has asked for my advice on my talk page, and I am bringing the question here for the input of other experienced editors. Robert McClenon ( talk) 19:50, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I still have sources from academic journals that state his notability. And why is something for congress not necessarily notable?
And I have been told that I can use some of th sources from colleges as long as I have established notability in other source such as the journals, newspapers, and congress. Is that not allowed?
I will also state that I was not trying to slip on by anybody or trying to game the system. The last reviewer was very confusing and contradicted what others have said and wouldn't remember other statements they have said. I was just trying to get some clarity. I'm not the kind of person to play the system. Aagreeny4 ( talk) 21:52, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for all the feedback and help Aagreeny4 ( talk) 05:38, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, can anyone please help me in adding the missing citations from the Hasso Plattner article? I'm an SAP employee and cannot directly make these edits. Though the citations would certainly strengthen the article, and have been called for at the top of the page. I've posted the citations on the talk page, and have reached out to a few editors directly, but with no success. Any help or advice is most appreciated!! Harper70 ( talk) 16:35, 9 November 2015 (UTC)Harper70
I know the question is trivial, but after I logged in to Wiki account, I dont see the option to edit the article which is placed here : /info/en/?search=India
Please guide me how to edit this article. Thanks in advance!
Willsparkles ( talk) 06:46, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
If i may guided how to choose articles which need editing, mean to say is there any specific page in Wikipedia which has a list of articles which need editing to meet Wikipedia's standard??
Thanks again for patience and response. Willsparkles ( talk) 09:32, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
I have submitted a new article about a regeneration project in Camden and I'd appreciate some feedback on whether the content contains enough detail to be notable.
Nw1cmdn ( talk) 10:44, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
That is really helpful. It would seem by adding more references I may have actually hindered the process!
I have included links below from local and national press that I think satisfy the criteria and are included in the article:
http://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/camden_collective_labour_cut_business_rates_rachel_reeves_mp_1_3976134
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/2a843076-4a6f-11e5-b558-8a9722977189.html
http://www.allinlondon.co.uk/news/article-17568.php
Grateful for your help.
Nw1cmdn ( talk) 20:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Archant is a privately owned media company serving geographical and specialist interest communities across a wide range of media and employing around 1,600 staff.
It is the fifth largest regional newspaper publisher in the UK with titles in East Anglia, London, Kent and the South West, publishing 1.6 million copies a week in print and reaching six million readers [a month] online.
http://www.archant.co.uk/articles/about-us-who-we-are/
Nw1cmdn ( talk) 08:39, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
I'm curious - why would a user intentionally edit anonymously, i.e. while not logged in? Thanks. Kekki1978 ( talk) 03:34, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
various reasons - if they're an established editor, they may not want to link it to their account. they may be up to no good! or may just want to work on an article which they don't want to leave an audit trail on linking themselves to it. Rayman60 ( talk) 03:59, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 410 | Archive 411 | Archive 412 | Archive 413 | Archive 414 | Archive 415 | → | Archive 420 |
Here is the draft about a band from Seattle called THE FAME RIOT that appears to be noteworthy. The feedback I am getting seemed to be helpful at first, but it's vague enough to confuse me. Here is the draft link: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft:The_Fame_Riot&action=submit Michael Sullivant ( talk) 01:36, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
What kinds o rights are there are Wikipedia? Is there a page about how to become one of those users to gain new privileges? Art234789 ( talk) 02:40, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
https://ta.wikipedia.org/?title=கவுண்டர் this page irritate my caste.i changed the content but one user blocked me i need to delete that page or i want to get ownership of that page?
Ranjith KonGu ( talk) 06:08, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Ranjith KonGu ( talk) 06:45, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Someone posted an incorrect birthdate on my wikipedia page and I would like it removed immediately. Please advise. Tfrancis 1 ( talk) 21:45, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
@ Tfrancis: you may also find the information at Wikipedia:Autobiography#Problems_in_an_article_about_you helpful. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:45, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Please help me to create page about our community. Before i created but was deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kulwant Ladhar ( talk • contribs) 12:23, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Someone created this page /info/en/?search=Gounder it irritate my community or caste how to delete this page?
Ranjith KonGu ( talk) 06:44, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
In the article "Lotti Golden" I noticed a Cite Error was listed on reference #42, " Cite error: The named reference Toop was invoked but never defined (see the help page)." I looked at the help page but I am still not sure how to remedy the Cite Error. Can someone be so kind as to assist me with this? Thank you! Magdalamar ( talk) 05:27, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
<ref name=Toop-2000/>
in order to invoke the other definiton. I have done this.
[2] If you want to rename one of the definitions to only be called "Toop" then you must keep the definiton text. You cannot say <ref name=Toop/>
when "Toop" is never defined.
PrimeHunter (
talk) 05:49, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Cullen, Thank you so much for responding. It's confusing as to why the error was posted in the first place. Due to the tedium involved in locating the source of the Cite Error, your suggestion to review the history until I find a version with the named reference intact is much appreciated. I will keep you posted! Magdalamar ( talk) 14:57, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
<ref>
tags in <nowiki></nowiki>
tags to avoid parser errors, e.g., <nowiki><ref></nowiki>
. —
Skyllfully (
talk |
contribs) 15:36, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Magdalamar, I have taken the liberty of moving your recent comments and the responses to them to the section of this page in which you posted your original question. It is best practice to reply to comments in the existing section, rather than starting a new one, in order to keep the discussion together. Cordless Larry ( talk) 17:42, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Although I am a newbie on Wikipedia, I can clearly find User:Delta13C is overtagging a page Nigma Talib knowingly, even there are no such issues, Can someone check his contributions. He seems to be linked with Michael Uzick, check his contribution at Draft:Michael Uzick and attacking the page with a biasness.(refer to the talk page) Please help me to understand if I need to know under Wikipedia editing policies. Perogrimadi ( talk) 19:18, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
I do not know if this topic warrants a page or not. It is my understanding that mathematical formulas cannot be the subject of copyright or proprietary information. I really do not know if this is true or not, but I know that Weight Watcher's could not keep the mathematical formula they use to determine how many points a particular food has a secret and the formula was here on Wikipedia. Anyway, Airbnb.com has this sliding scale for their commission that they charge guests. It is between 6% and 12% of whatever the host charges the guests. The guests often ask me how much the commission will be but I cannot answer this question because Airbnb.com will not tell me the formula. Is this legal? I asked if this was proprietary information and they said yes. Basically, how it works is, if the guest is paying a small amount the commission is higher, and if they are paying a lot it is lower, but they will not reveal the points at which it goes up or down. This stupid company prides itself on honesty and transparency, but that is only for the users, not for them. Is this a topic that would warrant a page or investigation. Would it even be possible to find out? (talk) 22:19, 7 November 2015
I posted this somewhere else on Wikipedia and a notice came up that said this topic warranted something(????) and other people had discussed it, but when I looked at the other stuff around it, it looked out of place. I am new to this and I am really not even sure if this is really an issue that has any merit. I just have a gut feeling it might or maybe Airbnb just annoys me and I have no point, but this place is like a maze to me, and I do not know where to post my potential input. Can you point me in the right direction? I know this is the wrong place, but I do not understand the terms here. Yes, I understand editing, but um... the other stuff mostly not.
Annforbes86 (
talk) 22:38, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you! I was just thinking about it and I was thinking it may not be the same thing as the mathematical formula as the Weight Watcher's thing because they are just keeping the point at which the percentage they charge a secret, they are not keeping the percentages a secret. Still really against what they preach... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annforbes86 ( talk • contribs) 23:05, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I have just created my first Draft article for "Lleyson Hopkin Davy"
Would any experienced Wikipedians be interested in please taking a look and helping me get the article up to speed? I have no experience in formally adding the citations etc.
Thanks in advance
note. Williams reference is a published book with many citations. London. Womens printing society. 66 Whitcomb st. Davy ref. on page 154 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davymi ( talk • contribs) 20:31, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
davymi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davymi ( talk • contribs) 10:36, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
==Early life==
how can Abusive Behavior like [3] be dealt with -- Aryan from हि है ( talk) 09:41, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi I am trying to draft and create a page for my daughter who is Hattie Gotobed - an up and coming actress. I have drafted and submitted but came back saying needs referencing. I have looked at the videos and read through but am still a little lost and would appreciate some help - ideally if someone can show me how to do the first one - what I need to do/ add etc... I could then hopefully do the rest.
Thanks very much in advance Tracy Romeha3 ( talk) 01:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Yes, shooting down the draft on grounds of bad references is correct as far as it goes, but inadequate. It points to deeper problems less likely to be fixed. Besides the problems already mentioned, there is Wikipedia:Up and coming next big thing, which can be roughly summarized as, we don't cover the up and coming. We wait until they have arrived. Jim.henderson ( talk) 14:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Would it be possible to get a digital copy of this 2015 Acm.org paper?: "Intuitive and efficient camera control with the toric space" by Christophe Lino and Marc Christie. Little bit hard to say anything useful with only the abstract at hand. It would be helpful in developing the article on virtual cinematography based on what the abstract says about it. The dl.acm.org site says it would cost me $15 but I'm not made of money. -- Redress perhaps ( talk) 14:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
New editor here. I've been making minor edits when I can. Today, I was reading the page on Korea and have noticed multiple problems and after viewing the edit history can see it is a pretty contentious page. Many other country pages have at least semi-protection to prevent this. What is the process for getting this for a page like Korea? I think it could really benefit from it. Rgallagher8 ( talk) 16:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Since I am now semi-retired, I have more time to do edits of topics of great interest to me. By and large, this is going well. Occasionally another contributor revises something that I had added; no problem.
But now I have a more significant situation. Over the weekend, I did a major edit of Rideau Hall adding quite a bit of new information, every bit with at least one citation. The individual who seems to have written most of the Rideau Hall item simply did an Undo of everything I had edited (03:40, 9 November 2015). My Talk page discusses this in detail. User talk:Peter K Burian#Rideau Hall is not the monarch's residence
I don't know if Teahouse is the correct place to raise this question, but perhaps you could lead me to the area where I could ask someone to mediate this issue. Thanks, Peter K Burian 13:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
We have templates that make this easier, such as {{
cite book}}
, {{
cite news}}
, {{
cite journal}}
and {{
cite web}}
. We also have some resources like
Wikipedia citation tool for Google Books to easily get the citation to place. Naked external links, as all your citations were, is far from ideal. Also, if you click "cite" in the toolbar above the editing window you will be provided a guided form for entry of a citation. See generally
Help:Referencing for beginners.
I can't read User:Miesianiacal's mind, and the edit summary accompanying his or her revert was opaque where it should not have been, but I believe this was at least a major factor in the revert. Fixing the citations would require quite a bit of work on another user's part. If that was the sole basis, it may be that leaving the edit, but asking you to fix the citations would have been a better route, only reverting if you did not after some sufficient time had passed. Anyway, all your edits are in the page history. You can click on the date of the version in the page history before the revert, click edit, fix your citations and save. Best regards-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 14:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC) P.s. If you need any help with understanding how to format the citations, I am happy to provide some concrete examples for you from your draft to get you started. Just drop me a line on my talk page.-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 15:13, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Why is this being asked here, behind my back (so to speak)? (I wouldn't have known about it had Fuhghettaboutit not pinged me.) Peter K's "major edit" (which it was indeed) was rife with problems; too many to cover in one edit summary. He can ask for my reasoning at my own talk page or at the article talk page, which is standard practice, per WP:BRD. -- Ħ MIESIANIACAL 18:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
This just came to my mind a few days ago. There are wikia pages dedicated to certain topics and are formatted similar to Wikipedia. For example, memory alpha is dedicated to the canon Star Trek.
Are these wikia pages by Wikipedia? Winterysteppe ( talk) 04:33, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
I declined this draft at Articles for Creation. I noted in particular that the submitter had been advised by previous reviewer User:LaMona to trim the irrelevant material out of the "Awards" section, and asked why the draft had been resubmitted with no changes. User:Aagreeny4 has asked for my advice on my talk page, and I am bringing the question here for the input of other experienced editors. Robert McClenon ( talk) 19:50, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I still have sources from academic journals that state his notability. And why is something for congress not necessarily notable?
And I have been told that I can use some of th sources from colleges as long as I have established notability in other source such as the journals, newspapers, and congress. Is that not allowed?
I will also state that I was not trying to slip on by anybody or trying to game the system. The last reviewer was very confusing and contradicted what others have said and wouldn't remember other statements they have said. I was just trying to get some clarity. I'm not the kind of person to play the system. Aagreeny4 ( talk) 21:52, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for all the feedback and help Aagreeny4 ( talk) 05:38, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, can anyone please help me in adding the missing citations from the Hasso Plattner article? I'm an SAP employee and cannot directly make these edits. Though the citations would certainly strengthen the article, and have been called for at the top of the page. I've posted the citations on the talk page, and have reached out to a few editors directly, but with no success. Any help or advice is most appreciated!! Harper70 ( talk) 16:35, 9 November 2015 (UTC)Harper70
I know the question is trivial, but after I logged in to Wiki account, I dont see the option to edit the article which is placed here : /info/en/?search=India
Please guide me how to edit this article. Thanks in advance!
Willsparkles ( talk) 06:46, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
If i may guided how to choose articles which need editing, mean to say is there any specific page in Wikipedia which has a list of articles which need editing to meet Wikipedia's standard??
Thanks again for patience and response. Willsparkles ( talk) 09:32, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
I have submitted a new article about a regeneration project in Camden and I'd appreciate some feedback on whether the content contains enough detail to be notable.
Nw1cmdn ( talk) 10:44, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
That is really helpful. It would seem by adding more references I may have actually hindered the process!
I have included links below from local and national press that I think satisfy the criteria and are included in the article:
http://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/camden_collective_labour_cut_business_rates_rachel_reeves_mp_1_3976134
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/2a843076-4a6f-11e5-b558-8a9722977189.html
http://www.allinlondon.co.uk/news/article-17568.php
Grateful for your help.
Nw1cmdn ( talk) 20:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Archant is a privately owned media company serving geographical and specialist interest communities across a wide range of media and employing around 1,600 staff.
It is the fifth largest regional newspaper publisher in the UK with titles in East Anglia, London, Kent and the South West, publishing 1.6 million copies a week in print and reaching six million readers [a month] online.
http://www.archant.co.uk/articles/about-us-who-we-are/
Nw1cmdn ( talk) 08:39, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
I'm curious - why would a user intentionally edit anonymously, i.e. while not logged in? Thanks. Kekki1978 ( talk) 03:34, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
various reasons - if they're an established editor, they may not want to link it to their account. they may be up to no good! or may just want to work on an article which they don't want to leave an audit trail on linking themselves to it. Rayman60 ( talk) 03:59, 10 November 2015 (UTC)