Versace11 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
24.205.234.250 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (confirmed by checkuser*)
24.176.166.135 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (confirmed by checkuser*)
24.180.3.127 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (confirmed by checkuser**)
64.69.158.252 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (possible based on geography**)
66.17.49.165 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (suspected proxy)
69.239.171.174 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (suspected proxy)
75.0.66.119 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (suspect for behavior and likely on geography*)
75.15.124.105 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (suspect for behavior and likely on geography*)
75.15.131.168 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (suspect for behavior and likely on geography*)
75.15.131.224 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (suspect for behavior and likely on geography*)
75.15.133.176 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (suspect for behavior and likely on geography*)
75.15.137.201 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (suspect for behavior and likely on geography*)
75.15.142.251 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (suspect for behavior and likely on geography*)
75.15.144.72 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (suspect for behavior and likely on geography*)
Bimota101 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (unchecked but suspect on behavior)
Barbieone (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (unchecked but suspect on behavior)
*Connection locates to San Luis Obispo (California, U.S.)
**Connection locates to the region of San Luis Obispo
Species8473 ( talk) 19:55, 21 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Using kommersant article as source for being a superpower. Only mention of superpower is in the title, that is not backed up by it's context, and for that misleading. Recently it was discussed at Talk:Potential superpowers. Five editors expressed being against using it as source. Only 24.205.234.250 claimed it to be an excellent source. Even though I left a specific message about that on his talk page 1, he just added it another five times (see below).
Long term edit war at Potential superpowers
Articles for what similar lists can be created (providing 5 diffs as evidence):
Also takes part in edit warring on Talk:United States
Incomplete list with a lot of personal attacks, such as constantly accusing other editors of hating Russia or racism. Even made a threat with violence to another editor once (second item).
Proven by checkuser case: Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Versace11
Talk: Lawn mower
As some one who has been very active at WikiProject: Power in international relations, I believe that all of those suspected sockpuppets and the master need to be blocked permanently. I can not begin to describe how much time, energy, and goodwill they have wasted. We've probably wasted two months because of their disruptions and slander. They have made personal attacks on nearly everyone that disagrees with them. For instance,
I think your just full of crap, your hogwash comments have no foundation of facts. Give me a break, 4.9%, try 5.8% from last week. No recession? Where are you from Saudi Arabia? What a dumb ass, the US is in a serious recession and you want to say everything is wonderful in the good old USA? Wow! That is some comment there Hobie Hunter. I think I will call Kermit the Frog tell him we have some kind of expert on Wikipedia so we can teach 3 to 6 yr olds about a former superpower since your so good at telling the facts right out there, your out there, way out there guy.--75.15.133.176 (talk) 09:08, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
That says enough. These sockpuppets need to be permanently blocked. They have the same agenda, stay on the same pages, behave the same, and have been disrupting all of the articles at [[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Power in international relations|WikiProject: Power in international relations]]. To anyone who has had to deal with them and seen their behavior as I have, they are all sockpupperts. Quack, quack, quack -- Hobie Hunter ( talk) 14:07, 26 June 2008 (UTC) reply
My opinion for block times:
I wouldn't bother with 75.15.133.176 and 75.15.137.201 for now. The first IP was used half a month ago, and only three times. The second only once, today. That may be reason enough for a (short) block. But they are likely owned by other people, and it may not help as it looks dynamic. I will monitor the IPs and pages though, that I judge should be enough. =Species8473= (talk) 17:02, 26 June 2008 (UTC) reply
I just added a section on the events at lawn mower. A bias section was created by 75.15.x IP from San Luis Obispo. After that restored by another 75.15.x IP and others we know is Versace11. And now it's the new account User:Barbieone restoring it. Here is ip2location on the two 75.15.x IPs 1 2. =Species8473= (talk) 12:12, 28 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Per the above discussion, I've blocked Versace11 indef, the three 24.* accounts for six months each, the 64.69.158.252 for three months. The last of these has strong behavioral evidence, and was shown to have geographical proximity by the checkuser report.
Per Species8473's recommendation I've left the two 75.* accounts unblocked, but will consider them later if this editor's distinctive edits continue from those IPs.
Please let me know if this report can be closed.
EdJohnston (
talk) 01:44, 27 June 2008 (UTC). Leaving the report open for a while since edits similar to those of Versace11 are continuiing from a new 75.* IP address near San Luis Obispo. See the comment by East718. Since the 75.* accounts have only edited Talk pages (not articles) there is no need to consider semi-protection, yet.
EdJohnston (
talk) 15:55, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
reply
Versace11 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
24.205.234.250 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (confirmed by checkuser*)
24.176.166.135 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (confirmed by checkuser*)
24.180.3.127 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (confirmed by checkuser**)
64.69.158.252 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (possible based on geography**)
66.17.49.165 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (suspected proxy)
69.239.171.174 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (suspected proxy)
75.0.66.119 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (suspect for behavior and likely on geography*)
75.15.124.105 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (suspect for behavior and likely on geography*)
75.15.131.168 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (suspect for behavior and likely on geography*)
75.15.131.224 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (suspect for behavior and likely on geography*)
75.15.133.176 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (suspect for behavior and likely on geography*)
75.15.137.201 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (suspect for behavior and likely on geography*)
75.15.142.251 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (suspect for behavior and likely on geography*)
75.15.144.72 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (suspect for behavior and likely on geography*)
Bimota101 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (unchecked but suspect on behavior)
Barbieone (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log) (unchecked but suspect on behavior)
*Connection locates to San Luis Obispo (California, U.S.)
**Connection locates to the region of San Luis Obispo
Species8473 ( talk) 19:55, 21 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Using kommersant article as source for being a superpower. Only mention of superpower is in the title, that is not backed up by it's context, and for that misleading. Recently it was discussed at Talk:Potential superpowers. Five editors expressed being against using it as source. Only 24.205.234.250 claimed it to be an excellent source. Even though I left a specific message about that on his talk page 1, he just added it another five times (see below).
Long term edit war at Potential superpowers
Articles for what similar lists can be created (providing 5 diffs as evidence):
Also takes part in edit warring on Talk:United States
Incomplete list with a lot of personal attacks, such as constantly accusing other editors of hating Russia or racism. Even made a threat with violence to another editor once (second item).
Proven by checkuser case: Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Versace11
Talk: Lawn mower
As some one who has been very active at WikiProject: Power in international relations, I believe that all of those suspected sockpuppets and the master need to be blocked permanently. I can not begin to describe how much time, energy, and goodwill they have wasted. We've probably wasted two months because of their disruptions and slander. They have made personal attacks on nearly everyone that disagrees with them. For instance,
I think your just full of crap, your hogwash comments have no foundation of facts. Give me a break, 4.9%, try 5.8% from last week. No recession? Where are you from Saudi Arabia? What a dumb ass, the US is in a serious recession and you want to say everything is wonderful in the good old USA? Wow! That is some comment there Hobie Hunter. I think I will call Kermit the Frog tell him we have some kind of expert on Wikipedia so we can teach 3 to 6 yr olds about a former superpower since your so good at telling the facts right out there, your out there, way out there guy.--75.15.133.176 (talk) 09:08, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
That says enough. These sockpuppets need to be permanently blocked. They have the same agenda, stay on the same pages, behave the same, and have been disrupting all of the articles at [[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Power in international relations|WikiProject: Power in international relations]]. To anyone who has had to deal with them and seen their behavior as I have, they are all sockpupperts. Quack, quack, quack -- Hobie Hunter ( talk) 14:07, 26 June 2008 (UTC) reply
My opinion for block times:
I wouldn't bother with 75.15.133.176 and 75.15.137.201 for now. The first IP was used half a month ago, and only three times. The second only once, today. That may be reason enough for a (short) block. But they are likely owned by other people, and it may not help as it looks dynamic. I will monitor the IPs and pages though, that I judge should be enough. =Species8473= (talk) 17:02, 26 June 2008 (UTC) reply
I just added a section on the events at lawn mower. A bias section was created by 75.15.x IP from San Luis Obispo. After that restored by another 75.15.x IP and others we know is Versace11. And now it's the new account User:Barbieone restoring it. Here is ip2location on the two 75.15.x IPs 1 2. =Species8473= (talk) 12:12, 28 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Per the above discussion, I've blocked Versace11 indef, the three 24.* accounts for six months each, the 64.69.158.252 for three months. The last of these has strong behavioral evidence, and was shown to have geographical proximity by the checkuser report.
Per Species8473's recommendation I've left the two 75.* accounts unblocked, but will consider them later if this editor's distinctive edits continue from those IPs.
Please let me know if this report can be closed.
EdJohnston (
talk) 01:44, 27 June 2008 (UTC). Leaving the report open for a while since edits similar to those of Versace11 are continuiing from a new 75.* IP address near San Luis Obispo. See the comment by East718. Since the 75.* accounts have only edited Talk pages (not articles) there is no need to consider semi-protection, yet.
EdJohnston (
talk) 15:55, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
reply