![]() | MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist is a page in the MediaWiki namespace, which only administrators may edit. To request a change to it, please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Spam blacklist. |
Spam blacklists |
---|
Mediawiki:Spam-blacklist is meant to be used by the spam blacklist extension. Unlike the meta spam blacklist, this blacklist affects pages on the English Wikipedia only. Any administrator may edit the spam blacklist. See Wikipedia:Spam blacklist for more information about the spam blacklist.
There are 4 sections for posting comments below. Please make comments in the appropriate section. These links take you to the appropriate section:
Each section has a message box with instructions. In addition, please sign your posts with ~~~~ after your comment.
Completed requests are archived. Additions and removals are logged, reasons for blacklisting can be found there.
Addition of the templates {{ Link summary}} (for domains), {{ IP summary}} (for IP editors) and {{ User summary}} (for users with account) results in the COIBot reports to be refreshed. See User:COIBot for more information on the reports.
Please consider using Special:BlockedExternalDomains instead, powered by the AbuseFilter extension. This is faster and more easily searchable, though only supports whole domains and not whitelisting.
![]() | Instructions for proposed additions
Please provide diffs ( e.g. [[Special:Diff/99999999]] ) to show that there has been spamming! Completed requests should be marked with {{ done}}, {{ not done}}, or another appropriate indicator, and then archived. |
This user appears to be creating subdomains with the same articles in some form of SEO spam. Recommend blocking main domain and all subdomains. ~ Matthewrb Talk to me · Changes I've made 03:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Might not be within the blacklisting rules – but I'm putting it here because of the slow-motion nature of the spamming. This blog, which is entirely in Persian, reviews films and has no encyclopaedic value. First added in September of last year, the user has returned to add it again today. Inserted each time as a fake reference to make spotting it harder, one assumes. 81.187.192.168 ( talk) 11:57, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() | Use this section to request that a URL be unlisted. Please add new entries to the bottom of this section.
Requests from site owners or anyone with a conflict of interest will be declined. Otherwise, follow these steps to post a properly-formatted request:
Providing this information often helps in a faster handling of the request. Once you have added your request, please check back here from time to time to get the outcome or to answer any additional questions. We will not email you or otherwise notify you about your request, and if no answer is received to a question, the request will be considered abandoned. Administrators: Completed requests should be marked with {{ done}}, {{ not done}}, or another appropriate indicator, then archived. |
pv-magazine.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot- Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
Not clear why this domain should be blacklisted. "Miasolé sets new flexible CIGS efficiency record" is cited in Copper indium gallium selenide solar cell and I was trying to fill in with a URL to the news page, but was blocked. — Chris Capoccia 💬 14:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
I was updating a list of energy companies by market capitalization (newcomer thing told me to) and was using the Tradingview stock screener to list them. Not sure why this is blacklisted and I cant find it on either of the lists it told me to check. It is like one of the leading platforms for financial data, not just US markets either. -- Sonderidk 16 June 2024
![]() | This section is for other discussions involving the blacklist. Old entries are archived |
![]() | This section is for technical problems with existing rules. Old entries are archived |
![]() | MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist is a page in the MediaWiki namespace, which only administrators may edit. To request a change to it, please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Spam blacklist. |
Spam blacklists |
---|
Mediawiki:Spam-blacklist is meant to be used by the spam blacklist extension. Unlike the meta spam blacklist, this blacklist affects pages on the English Wikipedia only. Any administrator may edit the spam blacklist. See Wikipedia:Spam blacklist for more information about the spam blacklist.
There are 4 sections for posting comments below. Please make comments in the appropriate section. These links take you to the appropriate section:
Each section has a message box with instructions. In addition, please sign your posts with ~~~~ after your comment.
Completed requests are archived. Additions and removals are logged, reasons for blacklisting can be found there.
Addition of the templates {{ Link summary}} (for domains), {{ IP summary}} (for IP editors) and {{ User summary}} (for users with account) results in the COIBot reports to be refreshed. See User:COIBot for more information on the reports.
Please consider using Special:BlockedExternalDomains instead, powered by the AbuseFilter extension. This is faster and more easily searchable, though only supports whole domains and not whitelisting.
![]() | Instructions for proposed additions
Please provide diffs ( e.g. [[Special:Diff/99999999]] ) to show that there has been spamming! Completed requests should be marked with {{ done}}, {{ not done}}, or another appropriate indicator, and then archived. |
This user appears to be creating subdomains with the same articles in some form of SEO spam. Recommend blocking main domain and all subdomains. ~ Matthewrb Talk to me · Changes I've made 03:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Might not be within the blacklisting rules – but I'm putting it here because of the slow-motion nature of the spamming. This blog, which is entirely in Persian, reviews films and has no encyclopaedic value. First added in September of last year, the user has returned to add it again today. Inserted each time as a fake reference to make spotting it harder, one assumes. 81.187.192.168 ( talk) 11:57, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() | Use this section to request that a URL be unlisted. Please add new entries to the bottom of this section.
Requests from site owners or anyone with a conflict of interest will be declined. Otherwise, follow these steps to post a properly-formatted request:
Providing this information often helps in a faster handling of the request. Once you have added your request, please check back here from time to time to get the outcome or to answer any additional questions. We will not email you or otherwise notify you about your request, and if no answer is received to a question, the request will be considered abandoned. Administrators: Completed requests should be marked with {{ done}}, {{ not done}}, or another appropriate indicator, then archived. |
pv-magazine.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot- Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
Not clear why this domain should be blacklisted. "Miasolé sets new flexible CIGS efficiency record" is cited in Copper indium gallium selenide solar cell and I was trying to fill in with a URL to the news page, but was blocked. — Chris Capoccia 💬 14:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
I was updating a list of energy companies by market capitalization (newcomer thing told me to) and was using the Tradingview stock screener to list them. Not sure why this is blacklisted and I cant find it on either of the lists it told me to check. It is like one of the leading platforms for financial data, not just US markets either. -- Sonderidk 16 June 2024
![]() | This section is for other discussions involving the blacklist. Old entries are archived |
![]() | This section is for technical problems with existing rules. Old entries are archived |