This is related to the Jari-Veikko Kauppinen article and the related AFD. The article's history is filled with apparant SPA accounts, but since it was tagged for removal the amount has actually skyrocketed.
The above editors and the two IP's have consistently been removing the AFD template from the article itself. None of the IP's or editors has ever edited anything else before, and their registration dates are all within two days of each other (20 april to 22 april). It is also worth to note that Radioline and Ransu Rapea use the same broken English when they warned two contributes for replacing the AFD template they removed.
Normally i would think this is a WP:DUCK case, but since i created the AFD i rather not act on this myself. I am not certain if these are sock or meat-puppets, but at the very least they are SPA accounts. The history lists more SPA accounts as well, but these aren't active for now so i am not including them here. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 18:21, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Clerk note: per the addition of two IPs the associated range appears to be 80.186.0.0/16 ( block range · block log ( global) · WHOIS (partial)) (65536 addresses), which apart from being rather a wide range seems to be pretty busy ( contribs), so I don't think that blocking it will be feasible. Spitfire Tally-ho! 11:25, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Administrator note All accounts tagged and blocked. The IPs haven't edit in days in it looks like their IP changes frequently, so no point in blocking them now. Range is also too big too block and collateral damage looks high, so unfortunately, no blocks there either. Elockid ( Talk) 15:17, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
This case has been marked as closed. It will be archived after its final review by a Clerk or Checkuser. |
Duck. Dabbled a bit to get autoconfirm, then went straight to creation of Jari Veikko Kauppinen, a re-creation of salted Jari-Veikko Kauppinen. When was this was speedied A7, tried again at JariVeikko Kauppinen. Dai Pritchard ( talk) 14:49, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk note: This new account was registered after previous accounts were abandoned. But, still, creating multiple accounts to re-create an article deleted via AfD is certainly WP:ILLEGIT. I'm calling an admin to compare newly re-created article with deleted versions. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:28, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
This is related to the Jari-Veikko Kauppinen article and the related AFD. The article's history is filled with apparant SPA accounts, but since it was tagged for removal the amount has actually skyrocketed.
The above editors and the two IP's have consistently been removing the AFD template from the article itself. None of the IP's or editors has ever edited anything else before, and their registration dates are all within two days of each other (20 april to 22 april). It is also worth to note that Radioline and Ransu Rapea use the same broken English when they warned two contributes for replacing the AFD template they removed.
Normally i would think this is a WP:DUCK case, but since i created the AFD i rather not act on this myself. I am not certain if these are sock or meat-puppets, but at the very least they are SPA accounts. The history lists more SPA accounts as well, but these aren't active for now so i am not including them here. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 18:21, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Clerk note: per the addition of two IPs the associated range appears to be 80.186.0.0/16 ( block range · block log ( global) · WHOIS (partial)) (65536 addresses), which apart from being rather a wide range seems to be pretty busy ( contribs), so I don't think that blocking it will be feasible. Spitfire Tally-ho! 11:25, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Administrator note All accounts tagged and blocked. The IPs haven't edit in days in it looks like their IP changes frequently, so no point in blocking them now. Range is also too big too block and collateral damage looks high, so unfortunately, no blocks there either. Elockid ( Talk) 15:17, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
This case has been marked as closed. It will be archived after its final review by a Clerk or Checkuser. |
Duck. Dabbled a bit to get autoconfirm, then went straight to creation of Jari Veikko Kauppinen, a re-creation of salted Jari-Veikko Kauppinen. When was this was speedied A7, tried again at JariVeikko Kauppinen. Dai Pritchard ( talk) 14:49, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk note: This new account was registered after previous accounts were abandoned. But, still, creating multiple accounts to re-create an article deleted via AfD is certainly WP:ILLEGIT. I'm calling an admin to compare newly re-created article with deleted versions. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:28, 24 April 2015 (UTC)