From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Starbucks6789

Starbucks6789 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)

16 June 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Makes the same edits at User:Realitytvshow, which has been proven to be a sockpuppet of Starbucks6789. They spefically keep deleting the contestant tables on the Ink Master (season 1) article. VietPride10 ( talk) 20:08, 16 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


25 August 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Rpdrchbb ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) was checkuser blocked by NinjaRobotPirate back in January 2019 as a sockpuppet of Starbucks6789.

Compare edits of Sturgwis12 to Rpdrchbb:

More diffs coming Okay, I think that's clear enough. EvergreenFir (talk) 00:59, 25 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


11 September 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Editing overlap with previous sock Sturgwis12 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Interaction checker

Sturg made this edit which I reverted. Dontworry reverted me

Dontworry messes with table colors [1] [2] just like Sturg [3].

Dontworry was created days after Sturg was blocked. Both edit on reality tv shows. Both typically edit tables. Both have initial edits creating user page and user talk page.

EvergreenFir (talk) 03:34, 11 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


04 November 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Originally posted at WP:ANI for a range block.

This range is likely being used by the same user as Starbucks6789. The IP geolocates to Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin. Note Sturgwis12 is a sockpuppet of Starbucks6789 and the SPI archives shows an IP that geolocates from a similar area.

On August 25, I reverted an edit by Sturgis12 ( [4]) and on October 21 an IPv6 from this range undid my revert ( [5]).

The IP range edits almost exclusively on reality shows, just like the sockmaster. EvergreenFir (talk) 01:52, 4 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


05 February 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

New account editing heavily on reality shows' pages. Making similar edits to past socks ( [6] compared to [7]; [8] compared to [9]). WP:DUCK

CU requested for sleeper check given history of socking by this account and confirmation to master. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:39, 5 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is  Stale. CU declined.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 18:43, 5 February 2020 (UTC) reply


14 February 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

This IP (24.183.100.236) geolocation is Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin, the same as 2600:6c44:5d00:f72:70da:4b71:123e:2e07, Sturgwis12 and Starbucks6789. Those IPs both heavily edit on the reality show's pages and make the same edit especially edit tables. WP:DUCK

—— A675974811 ( talk) 13:22, 14 February 2020 (UTC+8)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • I came across IP 24.183.100.236 via my watchlist and was going to report them here as well but A675974811 beat me to it. The behavior of this IP is similar to previous blocked users where they want to revert and in some cases discuss via edit summaries and not discuss changes via the article talk page or their own talk page. I would also recommend semi-protecting affected pages temporarily to detour use if IPs to evade blocks. Alucard 16 ❯❯❯ chat? 21:24, 14 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

I have blocked Special:Contributions/24.183.100.236 one month based on behavior, due to the reverting on reality show articles and the geolocation to Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin. EdJohnston ( talk) 17:18, 15 February 2020 (UTC) reply

03 March 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

This IP reverted my edits made on 4 Big Brother related articles [18] [19] [20] [21] to versions that were made by IP 24.183.100.236 which was found as a sockpuppet of Starbucks6789. So this smells like WP:DUCK to me. Alucard 16 ❯❯❯ chat? 04:04, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


28 March 2020

Suspected sockpuppets


New account registred less than 24 hours with a name similar to previous socks. First four edits made outside of userspace were to pages edited by previous confirmed sock Sisters133 which are reality show pages. [22] [23] [24] [25] Pretty much a WP:DUCK situation. Alucard 16 ❯❯❯ chat? 15:23, 28 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


20 October 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

I am claiming WP:DUCK on these. Both named accounts have been changing "left" to "removed" and vice versa on Bad Girls Club pages. (e.g., [26], [27]). We've seen this behavior with past socks (e.g., [28], [29]).

I know the IP cannot be confirmed to any accounts per privacy rules. I list it because it is from Sturgeon Bay, WI and we've seen similar geolocated IPs with this SPI.

I am requesting CU to confirm the two named accounts to each other and look for sleepers related to them. I assume past confirmed accounts are too stale to connect to these, but I submit the behavior evidence to show their connection to Starbucks6789 EvergreenFir (talk) 18:19, 20 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Mz7 Thank you! I'll block accounts and IP. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:00, 21 October 2020 (UTC) reply

17 November 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

Similar naming pattern to previous socks (e.g., FENDIMARAJ ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)). All edits are on Bad Girls Club, specifically the cast sections. WP:DUCK

Asking for CU given the history and prolific socking. Please check for sleepers EvergreenFir (talk) 18:27, 17 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Also found and  Confirmed to the accounts above:
Baddddiee ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
YMCMBBB ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
FENDIMARAJ ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
The rest of the accounts are  Likely linked to the master. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 21:23, 17 November 2020 (UTC) reply
  •  Clerk note: Blocking and tagging the remaining unblocked accounts as suspected. Based on the CU results, maybe it should be proven, but it doesn't seem worth sweating the difference. I'm also claiming hazard duty pay for making me read plot summaries of reality TV shows. Closing. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

02 January 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

CU confirmed. Filing for record-keeping. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:37, 2 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Starbucks6789

Starbucks6789 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)

16 June 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Makes the same edits at User:Realitytvshow, which has been proven to be a sockpuppet of Starbucks6789. They spefically keep deleting the contestant tables on the Ink Master (season 1) article. VietPride10 ( talk) 20:08, 16 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


25 August 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Rpdrchbb ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) was checkuser blocked by NinjaRobotPirate back in January 2019 as a sockpuppet of Starbucks6789.

Compare edits of Sturgwis12 to Rpdrchbb:

More diffs coming Okay, I think that's clear enough. EvergreenFir (talk) 00:59, 25 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


11 September 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Editing overlap with previous sock Sturgwis12 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Interaction checker

Sturg made this edit which I reverted. Dontworry reverted me

Dontworry messes with table colors [1] [2] just like Sturg [3].

Dontworry was created days after Sturg was blocked. Both edit on reality tv shows. Both typically edit tables. Both have initial edits creating user page and user talk page.

EvergreenFir (talk) 03:34, 11 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


04 November 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Originally posted at WP:ANI for a range block.

This range is likely being used by the same user as Starbucks6789. The IP geolocates to Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin. Note Sturgwis12 is a sockpuppet of Starbucks6789 and the SPI archives shows an IP that geolocates from a similar area.

On August 25, I reverted an edit by Sturgis12 ( [4]) and on October 21 an IPv6 from this range undid my revert ( [5]).

The IP range edits almost exclusively on reality shows, just like the sockmaster. EvergreenFir (talk) 01:52, 4 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


05 February 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

New account editing heavily on reality shows' pages. Making similar edits to past socks ( [6] compared to [7]; [8] compared to [9]). WP:DUCK

CU requested for sleeper check given history of socking by this account and confirmation to master. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:39, 5 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is  Stale. CU declined.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 18:43, 5 February 2020 (UTC) reply


14 February 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

This IP (24.183.100.236) geolocation is Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin, the same as 2600:6c44:5d00:f72:70da:4b71:123e:2e07, Sturgwis12 and Starbucks6789. Those IPs both heavily edit on the reality show's pages and make the same edit especially edit tables. WP:DUCK

—— A675974811 ( talk) 13:22, 14 February 2020 (UTC+8)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • I came across IP 24.183.100.236 via my watchlist and was going to report them here as well but A675974811 beat me to it. The behavior of this IP is similar to previous blocked users where they want to revert and in some cases discuss via edit summaries and not discuss changes via the article talk page or their own talk page. I would also recommend semi-protecting affected pages temporarily to detour use if IPs to evade blocks. Alucard 16 ❯❯❯ chat? 21:24, 14 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

I have blocked Special:Contributions/24.183.100.236 one month based on behavior, due to the reverting on reality show articles and the geolocation to Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin. EdJohnston ( talk) 17:18, 15 February 2020 (UTC) reply

03 March 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

This IP reverted my edits made on 4 Big Brother related articles [18] [19] [20] [21] to versions that were made by IP 24.183.100.236 which was found as a sockpuppet of Starbucks6789. So this smells like WP:DUCK to me. Alucard 16 ❯❯❯ chat? 04:04, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


28 March 2020

Suspected sockpuppets


New account registred less than 24 hours with a name similar to previous socks. First four edits made outside of userspace were to pages edited by previous confirmed sock Sisters133 which are reality show pages. [22] [23] [24] [25] Pretty much a WP:DUCK situation. Alucard 16 ❯❯❯ chat? 15:23, 28 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


20 October 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

I am claiming WP:DUCK on these. Both named accounts have been changing "left" to "removed" and vice versa on Bad Girls Club pages. (e.g., [26], [27]). We've seen this behavior with past socks (e.g., [28], [29]).

I know the IP cannot be confirmed to any accounts per privacy rules. I list it because it is from Sturgeon Bay, WI and we've seen similar geolocated IPs with this SPI.

I am requesting CU to confirm the two named accounts to each other and look for sleepers related to them. I assume past confirmed accounts are too stale to connect to these, but I submit the behavior evidence to show their connection to Starbucks6789 EvergreenFir (talk) 18:19, 20 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Mz7 Thank you! I'll block accounts and IP. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:00, 21 October 2020 (UTC) reply

17 November 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

Similar naming pattern to previous socks (e.g., FENDIMARAJ ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)). All edits are on Bad Girls Club, specifically the cast sections. WP:DUCK

Asking for CU given the history and prolific socking. Please check for sleepers EvergreenFir (talk) 18:27, 17 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Also found and  Confirmed to the accounts above:
Baddddiee ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
YMCMBBB ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
FENDIMARAJ ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
The rest of the accounts are  Likely linked to the master. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 21:23, 17 November 2020 (UTC) reply
  •  Clerk note: Blocking and tagging the remaining unblocked accounts as suspected. Based on the CU results, maybe it should be proven, but it doesn't seem worth sweating the difference. I'm also claiming hazard duty pay for making me read plot summaries of reality TV shows. Closing. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

02 January 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

CU confirmed. Filing for record-keeping. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:37, 2 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments



Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook