This concerns an investigation led by Jimbo Wales ( talk · contribs) into the PR firm Bell Pottinger editing articles on behalf of its clients: see Wikipedia:Bell Pottinger COI Investigations. The investigation was assisted by functionaries WilliamH ( talk · contribs), Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry ( talk · contribs) and Keegan ( talk · contribs), and additional editorial assistance was provided by Panyd ( talk · contribs).
The following accounts were Confirmed to be operated by Bell Pottinger, and indefinitely blocked:
The following were blocked as
Likely accounts:
The following was blocked as a Confirmed sock belonging to Chime Communications, Bell Pottinger's parent company:
WilliamH ( talk) 18:22, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
I've indef'd all of these as spammers (and some as obvious socks of each other). Quite a few have been checked already, but I'm pretty sure that at least the first three haven't. No idea if any of them are directly connected to Bell Pottinger. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:56, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. There is a post at ANI regarding this: Please centralise discussion there :-) The Cavalry ( Message me) 14:10, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
It is claimed on the userpage to be a Bell Pottinger Account. I couldn't see anything on the investigation page which said they had been permitted to create a group account, so wanted to add it to this SPI case for the record and for someone to either confirm or deny that this account is allowed. Pontificalibus ( talk) 16:50, 16 March 2012 (UTC) Pontificalibus ( talk) 16:56, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This concerns an investigation led by Jimbo Wales ( talk · contribs) into the PR firm Bell Pottinger editing articles on behalf of its clients: see Wikipedia:Bell Pottinger COI Investigations. The investigation was assisted by functionaries WilliamH ( talk · contribs), Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry ( talk · contribs) and Keegan ( talk · contribs), and additional editorial assistance was provided by Panyd ( talk · contribs).
The following accounts were Confirmed to be operated by Bell Pottinger, and indefinitely blocked:
The following were blocked as
Likely accounts:
The following was blocked as a Confirmed sock belonging to Chime Communications, Bell Pottinger's parent company:
WilliamH ( talk) 18:22, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
I've indef'd all of these as spammers (and some as obvious socks of each other). Quite a few have been checked already, but I'm pretty sure that at least the first three haven't. No idea if any of them are directly connected to Bell Pottinger. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:56, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. There is a post at ANI regarding this: Please centralise discussion there :-) The Cavalry ( Message me) 14:10, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
It is claimed on the userpage to be a Bell Pottinger Account. I couldn't see anything on the investigation page which said they had been permitted to create a group account, so wanted to add it to this SPI case for the record and for someone to either confirm or deny that this account is allowed. Pontificalibus ( talk) 16:50, 16 March 2012 (UTC) Pontificalibus ( talk) 16:56, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.