Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Pcgmsrich

Pcgmsrich ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

16 June 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

They're already cu blocked on commons but username is pretty much the same plus overlapping edits in all the usual musician articles, see Post Malone, Katy Perry, Demi Lovato etc... Praxidicae ( talk) 13:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

10 July 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

1. Special:Diff/951092418 2. Special:Diff/954792908 3. c:Special:Diff/432328900. Jonteemil ( talk) 19:24, 10 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

08 September 2020

Suspected sockpuppets


Reversion to restore edit of confirmed sock on Super Why! ( Fartface2007 King82202), interest related to numbers/dates ( King82202 on en.wikiquote; Pcgmsrich: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]); username similarity. Эlcobbola  talk 15:58, 8 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Added Chapparells. Editing Good Bones (TV series) ( Chapparells Pcgmrich) and related to Katy Perry ( Chapparells Pcgmrich). Chapparells also confirmed on Commons - CU data are here. Эlcobbola  talk 16:14, 8 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

-- Amanda (aka DQ) 21:46, 8 September 2020 (UTC) reply

05 November 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

[6]. Heart (talk) 13:12, 5 November 2020 (UTC) reply

I corrected the username of OglebayWheeling as the account that you provided did not exist. The other thing that seems to be missing is any actual evidence. Awarding a barnstar is not, by itself, evidence of any wrongdoing even if it is to an outed sockpuppet. Of course, it may be part of a larger pattern of evidence but as I said, that has not been provided. Just a quick check shows no overlap of editing between OglebayWheeling and any other account identified in this case. Just twigged that the barnstar was awarded in support of an unblock request for a blocked sock. Comments struck. 86.140.67.152 ( talk) 18:20, 5 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

12 November 2020

Suspected sockpuppets


The edits by these users seem exactly alike. They all spam the same information on the articles. They all also kept reverting the actions of other users when they attempted to remove the vandalism. The usernames are very similar, and their edits are also very similar. Diff 1 Diff 2 Diff 3 ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 02:12, 12 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

31 January 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


Vandalism on 1987 and vandalism on 1987, first thing out of the gate.   Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me Elizium23 ( talk) 22:54, 31 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Also found and  Confirmed:
Courtney1973 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Phillip1978 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Pgcsrich ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 00:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC) reply

06 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

This user tends to have many accounts, so I requested CU to catch them. Steve M ( talk) 14:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

07 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

DUCK! Steve M ( talk) 00:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

09 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Lizzo Elizium23 ( talk) 05:04, 9 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

14 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Nonsensical vandalism that is reverted unusually rapidly, which is the main thing this LTA does. See all other socks' contributions. CU for sleepers as this is an LTA. Steve M ( talk) 02:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC) reply

EDIT: Generic 1-sentence unblock request is also strong evidence that this account is a Pcgmsrich sock. 03:32, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
EDIT 2: Another one. Notice the "Mediati" in both names like the "Revere" pattern and rapid revert-warring vandalism on one or two pages. Steve M ( talk) 14:36, 14 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

23 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Rapid edit-warring vandalism. CU for sleeper accounts, as this is an LTA. Steve M ( talk) 21:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

24 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Another blatant one for CU sleeper check and tagging is needed. Steve M ( talk) 02:26, 24 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

JJMC89, would it be a good idea to delete all sock tags and categories per DENY and just make an LTA page? Steve M ( talk) 02:33, 24 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

25 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

How long is this going to last? Another one reverts my revert of Pcgmspoor, a blatant sock. Can a CU rangeblock the underlying IP? Steve M ( talk) 16:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Zzuuzz I doubt this is Cruizir, as a lot of vandals impersonate him in order to get the attention that the desperately want. Would it be best to deny recognition and revoke talk page access of Ambergarden? Steve M ( talk) 18:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC) reply

I'll go with what I said, but there is one credible alternative: Woshiyiweizhongguoren. In any case, it's a bit academic, of no real import. Maybe tags are not helpful. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:26, 25 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • This, and other socks I've looked at, are the same person as User talk:Ambergarden and their socks, who, along with impersonating several other vandals, claims to be Cruizir. I'd say it's possilikely, but whether that's actually true is an academic exercise for the reader. Also, like CaptainEek suggests, effective range blocks are not always easy or possible. -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:36, 25 February 2021 (UTC) reply

21 March 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Yup. Several other socks encountered, including User:Sheetz2021 - all blocked. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:01, 21 March 2021 (UTC) reply

07 June 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Username, and editing in musician articles. CU for sleepers, it appears to have been a while since the master was last checked. Pahunkat ( talk) 16:28, 7 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Checkuser note: you can pretty much assume that if Yamla or I have thumped a pcgmsrich we've checked the range. My own personal policy favors WP:DENY in the case of LTAs. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 20:33, 7 June 2021 (UTC) reply

13 January 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Dolfi2000 was blocked after edit-warring, changing the graphic representation of music staff sharps and flats on multiple articles. The username Dolfi2000 was registered after multiple IPs were blocked doing the same thing on musical key articles. [7] [8] 홍성국강준현 restored two of the same edits of Dolfi2000 and various IPs. Example 1. [9] [10] [11] [12] Example 2. [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]

Checkuser requested to check for sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 15:59, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Spicy, Dolfi2000 is RafikiSykes or Pcgmsrich. They have overlapping ranges on Commons; Dolfi2000 behaviour there more closely matches RafikiSykes. Эlcobbola  talk 22:59, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Spicy, sorry to ping again and to keep updating: Dolfi2000 on en.wiki, however, more closely matches Pcgmsrich (compare interest musical notes and content of unblock requests). Эlcobbola  talk 23:03, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Pcgmsrich/Archive&oldid=1137500846"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Pcgmsrich

Pcgmsrich ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

16 June 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

They're already cu blocked on commons but username is pretty much the same plus overlapping edits in all the usual musician articles, see Post Malone, Katy Perry, Demi Lovato etc... Praxidicae ( talk) 13:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

10 July 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

1. Special:Diff/951092418 2. Special:Diff/954792908 3. c:Special:Diff/432328900. Jonteemil ( talk) 19:24, 10 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

08 September 2020

Suspected sockpuppets


Reversion to restore edit of confirmed sock on Super Why! ( Fartface2007 King82202), interest related to numbers/dates ( King82202 on en.wikiquote; Pcgmsrich: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]); username similarity. Эlcobbola  talk 15:58, 8 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Added Chapparells. Editing Good Bones (TV series) ( Chapparells Pcgmrich) and related to Katy Perry ( Chapparells Pcgmrich). Chapparells also confirmed on Commons - CU data are here. Эlcobbola  talk 16:14, 8 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

-- Amanda (aka DQ) 21:46, 8 September 2020 (UTC) reply

05 November 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

[6]. Heart (talk) 13:12, 5 November 2020 (UTC) reply

I corrected the username of OglebayWheeling as the account that you provided did not exist. The other thing that seems to be missing is any actual evidence. Awarding a barnstar is not, by itself, evidence of any wrongdoing even if it is to an outed sockpuppet. Of course, it may be part of a larger pattern of evidence but as I said, that has not been provided. Just a quick check shows no overlap of editing between OglebayWheeling and any other account identified in this case. Just twigged that the barnstar was awarded in support of an unblock request for a blocked sock. Comments struck. 86.140.67.152 ( talk) 18:20, 5 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

12 November 2020

Suspected sockpuppets


The edits by these users seem exactly alike. They all spam the same information on the articles. They all also kept reverting the actions of other users when they attempted to remove the vandalism. The usernames are very similar, and their edits are also very similar. Diff 1 Diff 2 Diff 3 ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 02:12, 12 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

31 January 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


Vandalism on 1987 and vandalism on 1987, first thing out of the gate.   Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me Elizium23 ( talk) 22:54, 31 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Also found and  Confirmed:
Courtney1973 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Phillip1978 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Pgcsrich ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 00:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC) reply

06 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

This user tends to have many accounts, so I requested CU to catch them. Steve M ( talk) 14:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

07 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

DUCK! Steve M ( talk) 00:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

09 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Lizzo Elizium23 ( talk) 05:04, 9 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

14 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Nonsensical vandalism that is reverted unusually rapidly, which is the main thing this LTA does. See all other socks' contributions. CU for sleepers as this is an LTA. Steve M ( talk) 02:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC) reply

EDIT: Generic 1-sentence unblock request is also strong evidence that this account is a Pcgmsrich sock. 03:32, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
EDIT 2: Another one. Notice the "Mediati" in both names like the "Revere" pattern and rapid revert-warring vandalism on one or two pages. Steve M ( talk) 14:36, 14 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

23 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Rapid edit-warring vandalism. CU for sleeper accounts, as this is an LTA. Steve M ( talk) 21:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

24 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Another blatant one for CU sleeper check and tagging is needed. Steve M ( talk) 02:26, 24 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

JJMC89, would it be a good idea to delete all sock tags and categories per DENY and just make an LTA page? Steve M ( talk) 02:33, 24 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

25 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

How long is this going to last? Another one reverts my revert of Pcgmspoor, a blatant sock. Can a CU rangeblock the underlying IP? Steve M ( talk) 16:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Zzuuzz I doubt this is Cruizir, as a lot of vandals impersonate him in order to get the attention that the desperately want. Would it be best to deny recognition and revoke talk page access of Ambergarden? Steve M ( talk) 18:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC) reply

I'll go with what I said, but there is one credible alternative: Woshiyiweizhongguoren. In any case, it's a bit academic, of no real import. Maybe tags are not helpful. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:26, 25 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • This, and other socks I've looked at, are the same person as User talk:Ambergarden and their socks, who, along with impersonating several other vandals, claims to be Cruizir. I'd say it's possilikely, but whether that's actually true is an academic exercise for the reader. Also, like CaptainEek suggests, effective range blocks are not always easy or possible. -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:36, 25 February 2021 (UTC) reply

21 March 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Yup. Several other socks encountered, including User:Sheetz2021 - all blocked. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:01, 21 March 2021 (UTC) reply

07 June 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Username, and editing in musician articles. CU for sleepers, it appears to have been a while since the master was last checked. Pahunkat ( talk) 16:28, 7 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Checkuser note: you can pretty much assume that if Yamla or I have thumped a pcgmsrich we've checked the range. My own personal policy favors WP:DENY in the case of LTAs. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 20:33, 7 June 2021 (UTC) reply

13 January 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Dolfi2000 was blocked after edit-warring, changing the graphic representation of music staff sharps and flats on multiple articles. The username Dolfi2000 was registered after multiple IPs were blocked doing the same thing on musical key articles. [7] [8] 홍성국강준현 restored two of the same edits of Dolfi2000 and various IPs. Example 1. [9] [10] [11] [12] Example 2. [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]

Checkuser requested to check for sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 15:59, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Spicy, Dolfi2000 is RafikiSykes or Pcgmsrich. They have overlapping ranges on Commons; Dolfi2000 behaviour there more closely matches RafikiSykes. Эlcobbola  talk 22:59, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Spicy, sorry to ping again and to keep updating: Dolfi2000 on en.wiki, however, more closely matches Pcgmsrich (compare interest musical notes and content of unblock requests). Эlcobbola  talk 23:03, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Pcgmsrich/Archive&oldid=1137500846"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE