Similarity in reverts: [1] & [2] also similarity in blanking talk page notices [3] & [4]. I reached to the article history by coincidence. Two opposite sides may be in edit wars. Did not study likelyhood of socking by opposite side for want time and searching socks was not my focus as such and also I am still not confident in assessing likely hood of sockpuppetry.
Thanks Bookku ( talk) 11:00, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
@Admins, the only reason I restored content on Insurgency in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa article was after seeing User:Dhawangupta who had no previous edits to the said article making mass removals (see: 1 and 2) with false edit summaries. I suspect that Dhawangupta, OP and Aman are themselves part of a WP:MEAT WP:CABAL, if not socks of each other. Oriental Aristocrat ( talk) 05:54, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
First edit was to ITN, an interested shared with all his other socks. [25] [26]
" Maharaja" means Emperor. He created account with same name before too, which was " Emperor of India".
I note the suspected (not convicted) sock to this sockfarm, "Oriental Aristocrat" failed to get himself unblocked, [27] thus he must have made this account to evade block.
119.153.38.84 is making the same allegation here (on Hindu terrorism) of "cabal" as Oriental Aristocrat recently did. [28] This is crucial because when Oriental Aristocrat was also opposed to moving this page. [29]
RoySmith found violation of logged out editing last time. [30] It probably makes sense that logged out editing violation is happening now as well.
Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 11:31, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Similar specific interest in creating India-Pakistan conflict stub articles and edits to cricket related articles. The editing pattern is similar as well (see for expample the use + in edit summaries). This sock was further created on the same day the last one was blocked.
Asking for a CU to further confirm this and check for other socks. Gotitbro ( talk) 03:41, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
Exact same editing style and disruptive editing in the WP:ARBIPA space with very specific interest areas as of the previous sock Shaheen of Iqbal: recent India-Pakistan even articles, ITN, cricket; see also backing edits prev sock, sock, sock.
Asking for CU to further confirm and check for sleepers (also see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Depressed Desi which this SPI is likely related to). Gotitbro ( talk) 16:04, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
are Confirmed to each other. The other accounts are stale. Blocking without tags.
PhilKnight (
talk) 18:08, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Since October 2023 (the last SPI) this account is making same suspicious edits as other others.
[Here] he is telling to " Please check talk page discussions at the insurgency of KPK article or insurgency in Balochistan articles."
[34] That is indeed about
Insurgency in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, his largest obsession on his earlier socks.
[35]
[36]
Looks like a duck to me.
Ping RoySmith and PhilKnight. Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 09:20, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Ridiculously report. This user doesn't even look anything like me + why did you wait this long to file this report despite the fact that you've known me for around a year and have interaction history with???
Please know that
CheckUser is not for
fishing and cannot be used to solve your content disputes with other editors that have just recently arisen.
Anyways, don't know if I should bother explaining the circumstantial evidence presented (that seem to look like intentional cherry picked edits in order to frame me) as I doubt CU would show any positive results but just to make things easier for the reviewing admins:
1) [45] This edit is obviously me reverting the sock of User:PrinceOfRoblox, around half of my edits are reverting socks of this user at this point.
2) You are mistaken here. I did not update about India in the edit you've mentioned, I actually updated about Afghanistan at the Terrorism in Pakistan page. I did however revert edit warring afterwards by multiple users that followed on this page
3). At the Turkey-Syria earthquake response page. Are you seriously going to use editing a page that was a global ongoing event at the time as evidence??? That page was hitting millions of views at the time and undergoing rapid expansion.
4). [46] This is just me reverting a suspected sock as clearly explained in my edit summary. There was a lot of content in there than just "Hindus".
Anyways, goodluck fishing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiu99 ( talk • contribs) 15:35, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Account reactivated after 4 months to vote on this RfC. [47]
This account has also made significant contributions to Lal Haveli, [48] [49] (both added dawn.com link) 2024 Pakistani general election, [50] [51] and more similar articles just like earlier socks. Capitals00 ( talk) 19:21, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
lots of behavioural edits with User:Oriental Aristocrat and User:Pirate of the High Seas within a short span of time. They exhibit similar interest in editing and are highly active in the "in the news" section. DSP2092 ( 👤, 🗨️) 17:21, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Similarity in reverts: [1] & [2] also similarity in blanking talk page notices [3] & [4]. I reached to the article history by coincidence. Two opposite sides may be in edit wars. Did not study likelyhood of socking by opposite side for want time and searching socks was not my focus as such and also I am still not confident in assessing likely hood of sockpuppetry.
Thanks Bookku ( talk) 11:00, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
@Admins, the only reason I restored content on Insurgency in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa article was after seeing User:Dhawangupta who had no previous edits to the said article making mass removals (see: 1 and 2) with false edit summaries. I suspect that Dhawangupta, OP and Aman are themselves part of a WP:MEAT WP:CABAL, if not socks of each other. Oriental Aristocrat ( talk) 05:54, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
First edit was to ITN, an interested shared with all his other socks. [25] [26]
" Maharaja" means Emperor. He created account with same name before too, which was " Emperor of India".
I note the suspected (not convicted) sock to this sockfarm, "Oriental Aristocrat" failed to get himself unblocked, [27] thus he must have made this account to evade block.
119.153.38.84 is making the same allegation here (on Hindu terrorism) of "cabal" as Oriental Aristocrat recently did. [28] This is crucial because when Oriental Aristocrat was also opposed to moving this page. [29]
RoySmith found violation of logged out editing last time. [30] It probably makes sense that logged out editing violation is happening now as well.
Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 11:31, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Similar specific interest in creating India-Pakistan conflict stub articles and edits to cricket related articles. The editing pattern is similar as well (see for expample the use + in edit summaries). This sock was further created on the same day the last one was blocked.
Asking for a CU to further confirm this and check for other socks. Gotitbro ( talk) 03:41, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
Exact same editing style and disruptive editing in the WP:ARBIPA space with very specific interest areas as of the previous sock Shaheen of Iqbal: recent India-Pakistan even articles, ITN, cricket; see also backing edits prev sock, sock, sock.
Asking for CU to further confirm and check for sleepers (also see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Depressed Desi which this SPI is likely related to). Gotitbro ( talk) 16:04, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
are Confirmed to each other. The other accounts are stale. Blocking without tags.
PhilKnight (
talk) 18:08, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Since October 2023 (the last SPI) this account is making same suspicious edits as other others.
[Here] he is telling to " Please check talk page discussions at the insurgency of KPK article or insurgency in Balochistan articles."
[34] That is indeed about
Insurgency in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, his largest obsession on his earlier socks.
[35]
[36]
Looks like a duck to me.
Ping RoySmith and PhilKnight. Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 09:20, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Ridiculously report. This user doesn't even look anything like me + why did you wait this long to file this report despite the fact that you've known me for around a year and have interaction history with???
Please know that
CheckUser is not for
fishing and cannot be used to solve your content disputes with other editors that have just recently arisen.
Anyways, don't know if I should bother explaining the circumstantial evidence presented (that seem to look like intentional cherry picked edits in order to frame me) as I doubt CU would show any positive results but just to make things easier for the reviewing admins:
1) [45] This edit is obviously me reverting the sock of User:PrinceOfRoblox, around half of my edits are reverting socks of this user at this point.
2) You are mistaken here. I did not update about India in the edit you've mentioned, I actually updated about Afghanistan at the Terrorism in Pakistan page. I did however revert edit warring afterwards by multiple users that followed on this page
3). At the Turkey-Syria earthquake response page. Are you seriously going to use editing a page that was a global ongoing event at the time as evidence??? That page was hitting millions of views at the time and undergoing rapid expansion.
4). [46] This is just me reverting a suspected sock as clearly explained in my edit summary. There was a lot of content in there than just "Hindus".
Anyways, goodluck fishing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiu99 ( talk • contribs) 15:35, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Account reactivated after 4 months to vote on this RfC. [47]
This account has also made significant contributions to Lal Haveli, [48] [49] (both added dawn.com link) 2024 Pakistani general election, [50] [51] and more similar articles just like earlier socks. Capitals00 ( talk) 19:21, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
lots of behavioural edits with User:Oriental Aristocrat and User:Pirate of the High Seas within a short span of time. They exhibit similar interest in editing and are highly active in the "in the news" section. DSP2092 ( 👤, 🗨️) 17:21, 12 March 2024 (UTC)