From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Notsosoros

Notsosoros ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
02 April 2014
Suspected sockpuppets

Whitewashing of Banc de Binary (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), a company with significant regulatory woes. Trivial edits to other pages until autoconfirmed, then suddenly adept at performing massive edits:

Besides Notsosoros, I've mainly requested checkuser because I hope it might provide a pretty unequivocal answer about some of the other personae. Pinkbeast ( talk) 11:03, 2 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

There was edit warring by Webgrasp and Notsosoros in late March. Right after Webgrasp got blocked, Notsosoros was also suddenly inactive (auto-block?). Also, the other 4 suspected socks started editing some hours after the block, all within the same 2-hour time frame, all with at least 10 inconspicuous edits to other, unrelated articles. They then all start edit warring a few days later. I find this chain of events pretty suspicious.-- Atlan ( talk) 12:05, 3 April 2014 (UTC) reply

I've added User:Ambernits, who shows the exact same editing pattern.-- Atlan ( talk) 16:23, 3 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Not that I've read every trivial edit, but Ambernits seems to have the dubious distinction of being the first to make a page worse in the course of getting autoconfirmed.

A number of the edits appear coordinated. On 1 April, Nadexman removes 19k of text w/o a summary, Restartmission and JordanTime remove more. I revert all three. Then Scrapeme undoes my edit five minutes later. Nadexman's and Restartmission's edits are five minutes apart. Jim1138 ( talk) 17:32, 3 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
  •  Clerk endorsed - Thanks for the diffs. King of 23:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC) reply
  • The following accounts are all  Confirmed socks of each other specifically related to the Bank De Binary and related financial articles:

On the same range I found the following accounts, in addition to this above, that all appear to be the same user:

I notice that NawlinWiki has blocked a number of the accounts in the second list. Perhaps they have an idea who the master is? For the record, the proposed master, Webgrasp ( talk · contribs) appears to be Red X Unrelated.-- Jezebel'sPonyo bons mots 18:28, 3 April 2014 (UTC) reply


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Notsosoros

Notsosoros ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
02 April 2014
Suspected sockpuppets

Whitewashing of Banc de Binary (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), a company with significant regulatory woes. Trivial edits to other pages until autoconfirmed, then suddenly adept at performing massive edits:

Besides Notsosoros, I've mainly requested checkuser because I hope it might provide a pretty unequivocal answer about some of the other personae. Pinkbeast ( talk) 11:03, 2 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

There was edit warring by Webgrasp and Notsosoros in late March. Right after Webgrasp got blocked, Notsosoros was also suddenly inactive (auto-block?). Also, the other 4 suspected socks started editing some hours after the block, all within the same 2-hour time frame, all with at least 10 inconspicuous edits to other, unrelated articles. They then all start edit warring a few days later. I find this chain of events pretty suspicious.-- Atlan ( talk) 12:05, 3 April 2014 (UTC) reply

I've added User:Ambernits, who shows the exact same editing pattern.-- Atlan ( talk) 16:23, 3 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Not that I've read every trivial edit, but Ambernits seems to have the dubious distinction of being the first to make a page worse in the course of getting autoconfirmed.

A number of the edits appear coordinated. On 1 April, Nadexman removes 19k of text w/o a summary, Restartmission and JordanTime remove more. I revert all three. Then Scrapeme undoes my edit five minutes later. Nadexman's and Restartmission's edits are five minutes apart. Jim1138 ( talk) 17:32, 3 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
  •  Clerk endorsed - Thanks for the diffs. King of 23:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC) reply
  • The following accounts are all  Confirmed socks of each other specifically related to the Bank De Binary and related financial articles:

On the same range I found the following accounts, in addition to this above, that all appear to be the same user:

I notice that NawlinWiki has blocked a number of the accounts in the second list. Perhaps they have an idea who the master is? For the record, the proposed master, Webgrasp ( talk · contribs) appears to be Red X Unrelated.-- Jezebel'sPonyo bons mots 18:28, 3 April 2014 (UTC) reply



Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook