their contributions and obsession with Arjun Kapoor's article is very similar to the parent account who was recently blocked for threatening me. More specifically, same non free images loaded by both users, here and here. KRIMUK90 ✉ 09:58, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Spiderman1993 has just blanked this page: [1]. I think we can safely assume socking... AndyTheGrump ( talk) 13:28, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
I am to socking but User Krimuk90 is building fake allegations on me and trying to block me for life. From: Spiderman1993 ( talk) 13:30, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
History of continued harassment towards me. Removing mention of herself from an archived discussion. Soon after, a message was posted in this archived page. KRIMUK90 ✉ 03:34, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Checkuser comments: All of the IP addresses that the master account and its socks have used, as well as the two IPs identified on this SPI, are highly dynamic and at least some of them are likely proxies. There is no reasonable prospect of qualitatively identifying any socks here, not that we would normally comment on IP addresses. A short block for the most recent IPs is all that can be done, and I've applied one-week blocks. Risker ( talk) 04:53, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Similar interest area, namely adding/removing height information and changing pictures in Bollywood actor/actress articles. this summary is very similar to this summary by original account. Obsession with Arjun Kapoor also continues in such experimental edits as this, which comprised much of the original account's contributions. And more obviously, this username is similar to the name of her previous sock. Krimuk|90 ( talk) 07:44, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
recreating recently deleted userpage made by a sock. User:Vanjagenije if you had looked at the only userpage created you'd have seen it was just deleted (i can't show you that) literally the day before Hell in a Bucket ( talk) 18:56, 19 April 2015 (UTC) [ [3]] should clear it up. Hell in a Bucket ( talk) 22:53, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
An obvious sock who doesn't seem to be tired of harassing me. -- Krimuk|90 ( talk) 01:24, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Only one diff needed as they admitted being a sock on my talk page.
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:5_albert_square&diff=next&oldid=663636364
This user constantly harasses Krimuk90. This to me is serious and the user has a history of setting up other accounts. I'm therefore requesting CheckUser to see if they have any sleeping accounts. As the user has emailed me quite a few times begging to be unblocked, I suspect that they may have. 5 albert square ( talk) 10:48, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I only have one piece of obvious evidence and that is that the IP blanked the SPI:
This IP is editing from the same areas as the previous blocked IPs so I've blocked it on sight and I'm about to tag it. I'm aware CU can't do anything about IPs, I'm just listing it here so we can keep a track of the IPs being used. 5 albert square ( talk) 07:10, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Gamer201 is an old account, created in 2008, but didn't make their first edit until 18 November 2015, editing only in their own userspace until 3 December, when they suddenly decided to remove material from an old talk page archive belonging to Krimuk90, the exact same material regarding Mriduls.sharma that has previously been removed by other socks (see archive history, Superman403 is a blocked Mriduls.sharma sock; as for Chander, see below). Among their very few edits outside their own user space are also a revert of an edit made by Krimuk90 (who Mriduls.sharma had multiple run-ins with), edits, including odd moves, of Boney Kapoor, an article edited by both Mriduls.sharma and multiple previous socks, and the edits that caught my eye, replacing the sock tag on User:Mriduls.sharma with a {{retired}} tag, and removing everything but that tag from User talk:Mriduls.sharma. Edits trying to hide the fact that Mriduls.sharma has been indeffed for socking that fit in with edits previously made by other socks (edits which include blocked sock Ranvirojha trying to move the user pages to a different name...).
When looking at the edits made by Gamer201 I found Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chander, which fits in perfectly with this SPI and Gamer201's edits, including trying to remove the exact same material from Krimuk90's old talk page archive as Gamer201 did. Chander was indeffed in November 2015 (not long before Gamer201 started editing...), but made their last edit just short of three months ago, so there might still be a chance to compare Chander and Gamer201 technically, which is why I have requested a CU check. Considering the number of previous socks there might also be sleepers. Thomas.W talk 19:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Editing same sort of pages:
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Renamed_user_henga2423&diff=prev&oldid=636912602
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Renamed_user_henga2423&diff=prev&oldid=636888111
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Arjun_Kapoor&diff=prev&oldid=633682353
Then Arjun is editing Mriduls talk page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Mriduls.sharma&diff=prev&oldid=748127539
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Mriduls.sharma&diff=prev&oldid=748127539
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User:Mriduls.sharma&diff=next&oldid=739991181
And they are claiming to know one another:
I'm wondering if they are in fact the same person. Requesting CU to see if this is the case and also to check for any sleepers. 5 albert square ( talk) 17:27, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
"Kumirk90" is an impostor of Krimuk90. Material.scientists is an obvious impostor of admin Materialscientist. Both accounts edited at Arjun Kapoor, which was also a hotbed of activity for a bunch of socks. I don't know who the actual master is, but given that two impostor accounts have sprung up in the last day or two, I'd like to get a CU to look into things. I've blocked both accounts, but have not tagged anyone. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 19:45, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Addendum: just added Supsupermanser to the CU list. He popped up at Arjun Kapoor restoring content added by Kumirk, and he also intersects with Kumirk at Abhishek Bachchan and Vivek Oberoi. In all these cases, he was adding actor heights based on information at lightscamerabollywood.com. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 19:56, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Pretty ducky, and the accounts have been indeffed, but I'm filing this for completeness. I'm opening a CU request only because he's been rather prolific l'm curious if there are other accounts out there that need to be discovered. No idea what this guy's game plan is, and other than opening the SPI a few days ago, I don't know what other intersection I've had with this person. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 21:13, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Impersonation of Cyphoidbomb (like with Cyphoidbombs) and userpage vandalism Linguist Moi? Moi. 19:08, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
See editing history of investigation casepage and archive page Linguist Moi? Moi. 19:22, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Admits it on user page. Linguist Moi? Moi. 08:43, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Suspected socks created User:Mriduls.sharma/1000 and User talk:Mriduls.sharma/1000. Sro23 ( talk) 12:01, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Reinstating the same edits to Arjun Kapoor blocked sockpuppets have made: [4] [5] [6]. This person has been non-stop socking lately. Sro23 ( talk) 11:50, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
(Non-administrator comment) Looks like a duck to me Linguist Moi? Moi. 12:00, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Duck. Admitted it here when they were pleading for a second chance at redemption.
IPs used:
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
their contributions and obsession with Arjun Kapoor's article is very similar to the parent account who was recently blocked for threatening me. More specifically, same non free images loaded by both users, here and here. KRIMUK90 ✉ 09:58, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Spiderman1993 has just blanked this page: [1]. I think we can safely assume socking... AndyTheGrump ( talk) 13:28, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
I am to socking but User Krimuk90 is building fake allegations on me and trying to block me for life. From: Spiderman1993 ( talk) 13:30, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
History of continued harassment towards me. Removing mention of herself from an archived discussion. Soon after, a message was posted in this archived page. KRIMUK90 ✉ 03:34, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Checkuser comments: All of the IP addresses that the master account and its socks have used, as well as the two IPs identified on this SPI, are highly dynamic and at least some of them are likely proxies. There is no reasonable prospect of qualitatively identifying any socks here, not that we would normally comment on IP addresses. A short block for the most recent IPs is all that can be done, and I've applied one-week blocks. Risker ( talk) 04:53, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Similar interest area, namely adding/removing height information and changing pictures in Bollywood actor/actress articles. this summary is very similar to this summary by original account. Obsession with Arjun Kapoor also continues in such experimental edits as this, which comprised much of the original account's contributions. And more obviously, this username is similar to the name of her previous sock. Krimuk|90 ( talk) 07:44, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
recreating recently deleted userpage made by a sock. User:Vanjagenije if you had looked at the only userpage created you'd have seen it was just deleted (i can't show you that) literally the day before Hell in a Bucket ( talk) 18:56, 19 April 2015 (UTC) [ [3]] should clear it up. Hell in a Bucket ( talk) 22:53, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
An obvious sock who doesn't seem to be tired of harassing me. -- Krimuk|90 ( talk) 01:24, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Only one diff needed as they admitted being a sock on my talk page.
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:5_albert_square&diff=next&oldid=663636364
This user constantly harasses Krimuk90. This to me is serious and the user has a history of setting up other accounts. I'm therefore requesting CheckUser to see if they have any sleeping accounts. As the user has emailed me quite a few times begging to be unblocked, I suspect that they may have. 5 albert square ( talk) 10:48, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I only have one piece of obvious evidence and that is that the IP blanked the SPI:
This IP is editing from the same areas as the previous blocked IPs so I've blocked it on sight and I'm about to tag it. I'm aware CU can't do anything about IPs, I'm just listing it here so we can keep a track of the IPs being used. 5 albert square ( talk) 07:10, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Gamer201 is an old account, created in 2008, but didn't make their first edit until 18 November 2015, editing only in their own userspace until 3 December, when they suddenly decided to remove material from an old talk page archive belonging to Krimuk90, the exact same material regarding Mriduls.sharma that has previously been removed by other socks (see archive history, Superman403 is a blocked Mriduls.sharma sock; as for Chander, see below). Among their very few edits outside their own user space are also a revert of an edit made by Krimuk90 (who Mriduls.sharma had multiple run-ins with), edits, including odd moves, of Boney Kapoor, an article edited by both Mriduls.sharma and multiple previous socks, and the edits that caught my eye, replacing the sock tag on User:Mriduls.sharma with a {{retired}} tag, and removing everything but that tag from User talk:Mriduls.sharma. Edits trying to hide the fact that Mriduls.sharma has been indeffed for socking that fit in with edits previously made by other socks (edits which include blocked sock Ranvirojha trying to move the user pages to a different name...).
When looking at the edits made by Gamer201 I found Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chander, which fits in perfectly with this SPI and Gamer201's edits, including trying to remove the exact same material from Krimuk90's old talk page archive as Gamer201 did. Chander was indeffed in November 2015 (not long before Gamer201 started editing...), but made their last edit just short of three months ago, so there might still be a chance to compare Chander and Gamer201 technically, which is why I have requested a CU check. Considering the number of previous socks there might also be sleepers. Thomas.W talk 19:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Editing same sort of pages:
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Renamed_user_henga2423&diff=prev&oldid=636912602
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Renamed_user_henga2423&diff=prev&oldid=636888111
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Arjun_Kapoor&diff=prev&oldid=633682353
Then Arjun is editing Mriduls talk page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Mriduls.sharma&diff=prev&oldid=748127539
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Mriduls.sharma&diff=prev&oldid=748127539
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User:Mriduls.sharma&diff=next&oldid=739991181
And they are claiming to know one another:
I'm wondering if they are in fact the same person. Requesting CU to see if this is the case and also to check for any sleepers. 5 albert square ( talk) 17:27, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
"Kumirk90" is an impostor of Krimuk90. Material.scientists is an obvious impostor of admin Materialscientist. Both accounts edited at Arjun Kapoor, which was also a hotbed of activity for a bunch of socks. I don't know who the actual master is, but given that two impostor accounts have sprung up in the last day or two, I'd like to get a CU to look into things. I've blocked both accounts, but have not tagged anyone. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 19:45, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Addendum: just added Supsupermanser to the CU list. He popped up at Arjun Kapoor restoring content added by Kumirk, and he also intersects with Kumirk at Abhishek Bachchan and Vivek Oberoi. In all these cases, he was adding actor heights based on information at lightscamerabollywood.com. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 19:56, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Pretty ducky, and the accounts have been indeffed, but I'm filing this for completeness. I'm opening a CU request only because he's been rather prolific l'm curious if there are other accounts out there that need to be discovered. No idea what this guy's game plan is, and other than opening the SPI a few days ago, I don't know what other intersection I've had with this person. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 21:13, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Impersonation of Cyphoidbomb (like with Cyphoidbombs) and userpage vandalism Linguist Moi? Moi. 19:08, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
See editing history of investigation casepage and archive page Linguist Moi? Moi. 19:22, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Admits it on user page. Linguist Moi? Moi. 08:43, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Suspected socks created User:Mriduls.sharma/1000 and User talk:Mriduls.sharma/1000. Sro23 ( talk) 12:01, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Reinstating the same edits to Arjun Kapoor blocked sockpuppets have made: [4] [5] [6]. This person has been non-stop socking lately. Sro23 ( talk) 11:50, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
(Non-administrator comment) Looks like a duck to me Linguist Moi? Moi. 12:00, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Duck. Admitted it here when they were pleading for a second chance at redemption.
IPs used:
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.