Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Ljlas20

Ljlas20 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

06 December 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK per sock naming convention and editing behavior. User:Ljlas20 was first seen editing the List of programs previously broadcast by Radio Philippines Network article and keeps on adding shows that did not even aired in this network. Once those shows are removed or his edits were reverted, he uses one of the listed sockpuppets to re-add his edits. See 1, 2 and 3 for editing behavior evidence. - WayKurat ( talk) 06:58, 6 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Confirmed, blocked and tagged. I've also semi-protected the article for a month. If the IP continues to be disruptive, please let me know (you can do it on my Talk page or here if this hasn't been archived). Closing.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 16:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC) reply

29 December 2016

Suspected sockpuppets


BlooandMacFoster was seen re-adding the hoax content inserted by Ljlas20 and his socks on the List of programs previously broadcast by Radio Philippines Network article. (See edits from Ljlas20, Liezandro02, and BlooandMacFoster from the said article). - WayKurat ( talk) 02:05, 29 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk - Please, compare to previous socks. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:33, 2 January 2017 (UTC) reply
  •  Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 01:21, 2 January 2017 (UTC) reply

12 January 2017

Suspected sockpuppets


DextersLaboratoryCN was seen re-adding the hoax content inserted by Ljlas20 and his socks on the List of programs previously broadcast by Radio Philippines Network article. (See edits from Ljlas20, Liezandro02, BlooandMacFoster and DextersLaboratoryCN from the said article). FYI. UEFA matches and World Series games were not aired in the Philippines until the 2000s. - WayKurat ( talk) 07:11, 12 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Adding User:RegularShowCN in SPI. This user re-added the same content added by the socks above. See latest edit for evidence. - WayKurat ( talk) 08:53, 12 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Accounts now blocked. Closing. Bbb23 ( talk) 14:48, 12 January 2017 (UTC) reply

19 February 2017

Suspected sockpuppets


Same account naming pattern with the previously blocked socks of Ljlas20 (Carton Network shows + CN). Also, the new sock was seen re-adding the same content added previously by User:BlooandMacFoster on the Template:Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation template. (see https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Template%3AIntercontinental_Broadcasting_Corporation&type=revision&diff=755710877&oldid=747746483 1], 2 for evidence). - WayKurat ( talk) 08:55, 19 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

20 March 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Seems likely to be a duck based on username and redirects to favorite articles of this sock. (PPGCN = PowerpuffGirlsCN) CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:04, 20 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • Any actions from admins? I think this sock is already blocked yesterday. - WayKurat ( talk) 08:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Already blocked by Ad Orientem. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 21:50, 28 March 2017 (UTC) reply

06 April 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Username quacking + contrib quacking CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:27, 6 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Blocked and tagged. GAB gab 14:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC) GAB gab 14:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC) reply

20 May 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK -- LG-Gunther :  Talk  00:39, 20 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Additional information needed - @ LG-Gunther: In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:40, 28 May 2017 (UTC) reply
  • No response in 8 days and the IP is not active any more. Case closed. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:55, 5 June 2017 (UTC) reply

31 August 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK This is another Sock of User:Ljlas20 is User:RegularShowCN1 these are same username of Cartoon Network Shows as Regular Show and CN1 means Cartoon Network1 as Vandalism and hoaxes has same as evidence forgot obvious sock of User:Ljlas20 sock LG-Gunther :  Talk  22:54, 31 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Certainly matches all his usual patterns of behavior. -- Orange Mike | Talk 00:26, 1 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Sro23 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

15 October 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

  Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me This is Sock of User:Ljlas20 is User:RegularShowCN2 has another username violation. User:RegularShowCN2 as Violated same username of Cartoon Network Shows as Regular Show and CN2 Created Sock again of User:Ljlas20 is User:RegularShowCN2 as created same as User:Ljlas20 Sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  01:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Additional information needed. In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:

  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. - ~ Rob13 Talk 02:18, 15 October 2017 (UTC) reply

17 October 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK Same as Sock of User:Ljlas20 LG-Gunther :  Talk  05:04, 17 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

To further strengthen this SPI regarding Ljlas20 mentioned socks. I already request a CU for Ljlas20 sock he vandalizing CNN Philippines News and Current Affairs. Pinging WayKurat and Oripaypaykim. -- 99.109.85.105 ( talk) 19:36, 28 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Account is blocked and I don't see the need for CU at this time. Closing. Sro23 ( talk) 01:55, 31 October 2017 (UTC) reply

17 November 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Hirolovesswords ( talk) 08:18, 17 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

The user account Zoebryce had been globally locked, I checked on the CA records, this user was blocked at ceb.wikipedia as "sockpuppet of LTA 2toy mora" summary, the other account 2toy mora was also blocked at ceb.wikipedia as "sockpuppet of LTA 2toy mora/Bertrand101" summary. If it is not wrong, this case maybe related to Bertrand101. SA 13 Bro ( talk) 16:19, 17 November 2017 (UTC) reply
Add 49.146.43.82 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) as a sockpuppet of Zoebryce2 also: [1] only 3 days after being blocked as User:Zoebryce2 for adding almost the same categories to the same article. (Should I have added that to the list above? I didn't because I don't know how far along the investigation is.) -- Closeapple ( talk) 16:24, 23 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Sir Sputnik as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

29 November 2017

Suspected sockpuppets 

Hirolovesswords (
talk) 13:03, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Additional information needed - In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:33, 29 November 2017 (UTC) reply
  • IP blocked now. Closing. Sro23 ( talk) 04:02, 4 December 2017 (UTC) reply

09 December 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK looks like as sock of User:Ljlas20, but behavior previously of User:EliasMint5301 as sockpuppetry again same as User:Ljlas20. LG-Gunther :  Talk  06:48, 9 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Let me strengthen this SPI for Ljlas20. I've requested an CheckUser to check any edits for the vandal's behavior. Let see any diffs here. 99.109.85.105 ( talk) 17:42, 10 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Additional information needed - In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. ~ Rob13 Talk 23:12, 10 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • No diffs provided. Closing.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 01:53, 20 December 2017 (UTC) reply

19 December 2017

Suspected sockpuppets


The username is the evidence itself apart from the editing behavior. Please note that Ljlas have two blocked sockpuppets with a similar name: User:RegularShowCN1 and User:RegularShowCN2. - WayKurat ( talk) 02:46, 19 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Now blocked. Closing. Sro23 ( talk) 07:39, 19 December 2017 (UTC) reply

27 December 2017

Suspected sockpuppets


The new username is the evidence itself. Ljlas created a new username very similar to the three blocked socks he created: User:RegularShowCN1, User:RegularShowCN2 and User:RegularShowCN22. - WayKurat ( talk) 01:24, 27 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

07 January 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


The username is the evidence itself. Ljlas20 usually creates new sock accounts by combining a Cartoon Network show and adding a "CN" suffix at the end. - WayKurat ( talk) 05:08, 7 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

09 January 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


The username is the evidence itself. Username is similar to the most recently blocked Ljlas20 sock: User:FlapJackCN. - WayKurat ( talk) 13:37, 9 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Sir Sputnik as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

11 January 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Several IPs in a similar range were blocked last November. They had a pattern of doing work related to television/radio stations and sports announcers, including a habit of adding (unsourced) announcers to the infoboxes of National Basketball Association team season articles. Examples of the previous IPs' work can be seen here, here, here, and here. These IPs have jumped in over the past couple of days, making edits like this, this, this, and this. These edits bear a strong resemblance to those performed by the previously blocked 49.146.XX IPs. Giants2008 ( Talk) 23:31, 11 January 2018 (UTC) Giants2008 ( Talk) 23:31, 11 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

I smell a range block. Let's close this--thank you, Giants. Drmies ( talk) 03:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply

17 April 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

  Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me The another username is the evidence itself. Username is similar to the Cartoon Network Shows most recently Notorious blocked Ljlas20 sock: User:Flapjack03, User:Flapjack02 and User:Flapjack01. LG-Gunther :  Talk  10:34, 17 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


18 April 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK - Same as Another Notorious Sock of User:Ljlas20 forget those Username of this similar to Cartoon Network Shows again. LG-Gunther :  Talk  22:02, 18 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

CU confirms that 02, 03, and 2 are identical. Drmies ( talk) 02:08, 19 April 2018 (UTC) reply

12 May 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

  Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me LG-Gunther :  Talk  05:36, 12 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

16 May 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

  Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me Same as Sock of User:Ljlas20 is User:JulieAnneRPNBeaGMA for Vandalism on Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation LG-Gunther :  Talk  13:25, 16 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

03 June 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

  Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me This is Notorious Sock of User:Ljlas20 is User:SamuraiJackCN as same as links of TV shows of Cartoon Network links to Users as Sock of Ljlas20 LG-Gunther :  Talk  14:26, 3 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Account now blocked. Closing. Sro23 ( talk) 00:27, 7 June 2018 (UTC) reply

16 June 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

New sock has the same naming convention on other recently blocked socks of Ljlas20 (adding -CN at the end of the username that usually is a show in Cartoon Network). Also, I have listed the IP address 49.146.37.33 for sockpuppetry. The IP keeps on adding the category "Radio Philippines Network personalities" on the Julie Ann San Jose article, even if the said artist did not become part of the network. JohnnyBravoCN re-added that category to the said article after reverting the edits of the IP vandal twice. See 1 and 2 for behavioral evidence. - WayKurat ( talk) 07:46, 16 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 18:55, 21 June 2018 (UTC) reply


21 June 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

  Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me LG-Gunther :  Talk  10:20, 21 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 18:55, 21 June 2018 (UTC) reply

09 August 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


Any concern about the use of showCN because he still using about the Cartoon Network show usernames starting with showCN? I would ask Blakegripling ph about Ljlas20 quack. 2600:6C4E:580:46B:0:E653:2549:B879 ( talk) 04:24, 9 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk - There isn't a whole to go on here, but what little there is definitely points towards sockpuppetry. Please check to confirm. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 20:29, 9 August 2018 (UTC) reply
  •  Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 21:47, 9 August 2018 (UTC) reply

20 August 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


New Ljlas20 sockpuppet appeared. Name is very similar compared with the most recently blocked sockpuppet ( User:JuniperLeeCN). - WayKurat ( talk) 14:39, 20 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Admins, please check this SPI. The sockpuppet is still active. - WayKurat ( talk) 05:33, 24 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Pink clock Awaiting administrative action - Given the username, this looks pretty clear cut to me. Please block the new sock indefinitely. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 21:18, 27 August 2018 (UTC) reply
  •   Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me,  Blocked and tagged. GAB gab 01:25, 28 August 2018 (UTC) reply

22 October 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK, Same as Long term Notorious Sock of User:Ljlas20, See [10], [11], [12] LG-Gunther :  Talk  08:09, 22 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

@ LG-Gunther: Please do not request a CU automatically every time you file a report. A CU request requires an explanation as to why it is needed. Generally, if your claim is that the new account is obvious, a CU would only be appropriate if there is a history of finding other accounts, which there is not. CU declined.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 14:37, 22 October 2018 (UTC) reply

  • Blocked and tagged the account. Blocking individual IP's isn't going to accomplish much here. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 03:38, 25 October 2018 (UTC) reply

02 December 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


The username is the evidence itself. Very similar behavior and username compared to blocked sockpuppet User:JuniperLeeCN1. - WayKurat ( talk) 12:57, 2 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • No doubt. Blocked and tagged. Case closed. Courcelles ( talk) 20:05, 2 December 2018 (UTC) reply

15 February 2019

Suspected sockpuppets


The username is the evidence itself. It follows the pattern of Ljlas20's older sockpuppet accounts. Also, the new sock account edits the same articles as what the recently blocked socks were editing as well. - WayKurat ( talk) 17:29, 15 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Blocked and tagged. But it would help if next time more diffs were included instead of just saying that everything is obvious. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 06:25, 16 February 2019 (UTC) reply

01 April 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK per username, maybe a continuation of blocked user User:Liezandro03. The IP address and the new sock account was seen editing the Radio Philippines Network article, similar on the previously blocked socks were done. See 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 for behavioral evidence. - WayKurat ( talk) 09:27, 1 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

19 May 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK, same as Notorious sock of User:Ljlas20. LG-Gunther :  Talk  07:45, 19 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Pink clock Awaiting administrative action -   Looks like a duck to me, but you might want to include diffs next time if you are saying it is obvious. qedk ( t 桜 c) 10:26, 19 May 2019 (UTC) reply
  • It's been a while since the last check, so I ran one. Both accounts  Confirmed,  Blocked and tagged. — DoRD ( talk)​ 14:53, 19 May 2019 (UTC) reply

27 August 2019

Suspected sockpuppets


The username is the evidence itself. The new sock account follows the name trend of blocked Ljlas20 socks. The latest blocked sock is User:Liezandro05. - WayKurat ( talk) 01:10, 27 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

17 September 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK on List of Radio Philippines Network affiliate stations and Template:Communications Group-Philippines article as Long-term abuse IP Sock of User:Ljlas20, see as evidence: [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21]. LG-Gunther :  Talk  02:33, 17 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • One IP is already blocked, the other is probably inactive. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 00:59, 20 September 2019 (UTC) reply

02 October 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

The username is the evidence itself. The most recently blocked sock for Ljlas20 is User:Liezandro06. The IP address also had the similar editing behavior of Ljlas20: editing the Radio Philippines Network and Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation related articles and adding hoax information on them. See 1, 2 for evidence. - WayKurat ( talk) 01:19, 2 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Account  Blocked and tagged. A range block isn't possible here without significant collateral damage. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 01:58, 2 October 2019 (UTC) reply

30 January 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

  Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me on Template:Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation, behaviour evidence like Vandalism as sock of User:Ljlas20 LG-Gunther :  Talk  00:09, 30 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

06 December 2020

Suspected sockpuppets


Both accounts are mostly editing or creating new articles involving Radio Philippines Network and/or Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation, similar on what Ljlas20 or the confirmed socks are doing before getting blocked. Also, both accounts follow a pattern: the names are based on the protagonists of the Grand Theft Auto series. - WayKurat ( talk) 15:28, 6 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Adding IP address 49.145.233.205 in this SPI. Seems that this IP reverts back any edits of the users mentioned above. - WayKurat ( talk) 05:59, 13 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Unsurprisingly, the two registered accounts are  Confirmed to each other.  Blocked and tagged as suspected socks. no No comment with respect to IP address(es). NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 01:31, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply

27 December 2020

Suspected sockpuppets


Too obvious that this is a new Ljlas20 sock. This time, he's using one of the protagonist names in Grand Theft Auto 5. Previously blocked socks were named after the protagonists of GTA III and GTA San Andreas. WayKurat ( talk) 03:41, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

01 January 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Same account naming pattern with the previously blocked socks of Ljlas20, which is from Grand Theft Auto: Vice City. Chompy Ace 05:42, 1 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

02 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


Similar edits. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:13, 2 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

27 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


WP:DUCK per last blocked username ( User:Lazlow GTA III) and the current sockmaster's "trend" of basing their usernames on the Grand Theft Auto series. Please check for any sleepers. - WayKurat ( talk) 02:55, 27 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • DUCK socks don't need checkuser, and an admin can block based off of behavioral evidence. Declining CU... ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC) reply
  •  Blocked and tagged, closing. Mz7 ( talk) 05:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC) reply

11 June 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


WP:DUCK based from the username pattern and editing behavior. Previously blocked socks were named after the characters of the Grand Theft Auto series, plus the game title itself. Examples: User:Claude GTA III, User:Tommy GTA VC, and User:Sonny GTA VC. - WayKurat ( talk) 06:40, 11 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

03 September 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

IP was seen editing the same articles that the sockpuppets have been editing ( Radio Philippines Network related articles). The new sock account reverted back the IP's edits. Also, the new account has the similar naming pattern compared with previously blocked sock accounts which are named after Grand Theft Auto series characters and the game in the series that the character appeared (samples: User:De Santa GTA V, User:Lazlow GTA III and User:Sonny GTA VC). - WayKurat ( talk) 01:37, 3 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • blocked and tagged CiprianiGTAIII. The IP looks dynamic, so not going to bother with that. Threw some semi-protection around. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:50, 24 September 2021 (UTC) reply

14 October 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Sockpuppet is adding hoaxes on radio station articles and disrupts Philippine related articles. Username WP:DUCK. SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 13:13, 14 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • SeanJ 2007 reverting all the edits of the suspected sockpuppet, but the sockpuppetry is not confirmed yet, the reporter also didn't provide any evidence that the suspected user is a sockpuppet. Any admins here can take action on this case? Ctrlwiki ( talk) 05:43, 25 October 2021 (UTC) reply
  • @ Tamzin: The sock is repeatedly doing the same as the previous sock accounts that is editing Radio Philippines Network related articles, see Special:Diff/1049860979, Special:Diff/1049861048 and Special:Diff/1049861241. The sock also disrupts Philippine related articles, see Special:Diff/1051581302, Special:Diff/1050677578 and others (just check the targets contributions and some of these are the same as the previous). The edits may not be the same of the previous socks (for some edits) but has disrupted the same articles (some has different edits like Radio Philippines Network related articles). SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 06:25, 25 October 2021 (UTC) reply
  • @ Tamzin: I will just mention WayKurat about that, because he often caught the socks edits that is similar to Ljlas20. Maybe he can explain it more clearer why. SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 07:24, 25 October 2021 (UTC) reply
  • @ WayKurat: We need your comment about here to clearly prove that Liberty1892 is a sockpuppet of Ljlas20. SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 01:58, 26 October 2021 (UTC) reply
    • Okay, I'm gonna reply on this SPI once. Liberty1892 is not an Ljlas20 sockpuppet. Based from the user's behavior in the past days, this user showed a different editing behavior compared to Ljlas20. I may have mistaken to tag the said user as an Ljlas20 sock in their talk page, since the user's account name may be based from Grand Theft Auto's Liberty City. There is a common pattern on Ljlas20 sockpuppets that uses names in the Grand Theft Auto series. I might be able to remove the tag before SeanJ created this SPI.
    • Based from my previous encounters with SeanJ (AKA User:Sean Ethan James D. Querubin), this user have made a lot of rash decisions lately: moving old articles to draftspace without even consulting the original author, requesting protection removal on an article that was protected for years due to a longterm vandal, because he believes that the vandalism is long been gone (not realizing that the protection itself is the reason why the vandalism lessened. Thanks Sean, the vandal returned on their shenanigans right after your request has been granted). Now, he created this SPI and keeps on nagging me on finding any evidence.
    • The concerns I raised may sound for an WP:ANI against SeanJ but I'll save it for another time. Right now, I apologize for tagging this user as a Ljlas20 sockpuppet. - WayKurat ( talk) 15:55, 27 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Tamzin as part of their training as a clerk. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference. You may pose any questions or concerns either on their talk page or on this page.

  • @ SeanJ 2007:  Additional information needed. In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this.
  • Also why is this username DUCKy? -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 05:42, 25 October 2021 (UTC) reply
  • @ Ctrlwiki: While normally one should not revert a sock's edits before they've been blocked, sometimes people (myself included) do do it if it's particularly obvious. It seems from Sean's filing that he feels that this case is obvious, so I'm going to assume good faith that he's just failed to supply the needed diffs. If we wind up determining that Liberty1982 isn't a sock, then we'll review things.
    More broadly, I see that you're coming into conflict with Sean in a lot of places. Showing up at an SPI like this to complain about him could be seen as WP:HOUNDING. If you have concerns about his editing overall, you would be better off going to WP:ANI or contacting an administrator. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 06:24, 25 October 2021 (UTC) reply
  • @ SeanJ 2007: Thank you. Could you please link some diffs from Ljlas20 or past confirmed/proven sox that are similar in nature? They don't have to be the exact same thing, just similar in some way that is unlikely to be coincidence. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 06:35, 25 October 2021 (UTC) reply
  • @ SeanJ 2007: You've already pinged WayKurat once. Since they've continued to edit, I think it's safe to assume that they're either already preparing a reply, or not interested in replying. There's no need to ping them again. (If you're worried that they didn't get your first ping, turn on "Failed mention" and "successful mention" in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-echo.)
    I'm going to leave this open a few more days, for you to gether more evidence, and for WayKurat to show up if they'd like to. (They're under no obligation.) In the future, please keep in mind the header at WP:SPI: Evidence is required. When you open the investigation, you must immediately provide evidence that the suspected sock puppets are connected. The evidence will need to include diffs of edits that suggest the accounts are connected. It's entirely possible that you're right here, but it's not so obvious that I can see it just from checking recent contributions. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 16:34, 26 October 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Closing without action, with prejudice.
    @ WayKurat: Thank you for your comments clarifying what happened, and for acknowledging responsibility for your mistake. If you want to apologize, though, it's better that you apologize to Liberty than apologize here. Just so you know, only clerks and admins should really be tagging users as sox. The documentation at {{ sock}} is rather out-of-date on this, and some other clerks/CUs and I have been working on overhauling that series of templates to make it clearer that that's not how they're meant to be used, so it's not your fault; but just for future reference.
    @ SeanJ 2007: In the future, please do not file SPIs if you don't have evidence of sockpuppetry. Also, please do not try to intimidate people by pointing to the existence of an SPI, after it's already been established that you don't have any evidence. You may consider this an informal warning (more for the intimidation than the filing). Now please go revert all of your reverts of their edits—or, if you stand by the revert for another reason, make a dummy edit explaining the reason. (That's not an "order" as a clerk, but me saying as a fellow Wikipedian that that's what's expected when an editor makes a mistake like this.) -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 18:33, 27 October 2021 (UTC) reply

15 March 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Recreation of Draft:News Update (RPN). Other edits look similar. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 11:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

I ran a check on the account. Case is  Stale, but comparing results to CU log data says this account could be a sock.  Behavioural evidence needs evaluation. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 11:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply

13 November 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK per behavioral evidence and username. Recreated an article that was previously made by several IP socks as a redirect (see edit history of News Update (RPN) and its public log. Both sock accounts were also caught editing the List of programs previously broadcast by Radio Philippines Network article, the other sock even moved it to a new title.

Please note that Ljlas20 uses Cartoon Network characters as their sockpuppet usernames. See User:Dexterdeedee1, User:JuniperLeeCN2 and User:PPGCartoonNetwork. Please check if there are also sleepers. - WayKurat ( talk) 09:46, 13 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Clerk endorsed - Please, compare to each other. Vanjagenije (talk) 16:40, 15 November 2023 (UTC) reply
  •  Blocked without tags. One I'm comfortable saying is  Confirmed based on technical data and one I'd say is  Likely based on technical data, plus behavior for both. Izno ( talk) 23:17, 16 November 2023 (UTC) reply

25 November 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK per username. Last blocked sock is named Ben10xSamuraiJack. - WayKurat ( talk) 01:58, 25 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 ( talk) 14:08, 25 November 2023 (UTC) reply

10 January 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK LTA Sock of User:Ljlas20, sames as Cartoon Network Shows Usernames. LG-Gunther :  Talk  05:37, 10 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Blocked and tagged. I see no reason to run a check, and the filer has not provided one. Closing. Bbb23 ( talk) 14:18, 10 January 2024 (UTC) reply

17 April 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK per username. Username has a similar naming pattern compared to the most recently blocked socks: User:TheSecretSaturdayxBen10 and User:Ben10xSamuraiJack2. Behavior-wise, the new sock has been editing mostly Philippine TV articles, same with other socks. - WayKurat ( talk) 01:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC) WayKurat ( talk) 01:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Ljlas20/Archive&oldid=1223037547"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Ljlas20

Ljlas20 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

06 December 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK per sock naming convention and editing behavior. User:Ljlas20 was first seen editing the List of programs previously broadcast by Radio Philippines Network article and keeps on adding shows that did not even aired in this network. Once those shows are removed or his edits were reverted, he uses one of the listed sockpuppets to re-add his edits. See 1, 2 and 3 for editing behavior evidence. - WayKurat ( talk) 06:58, 6 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Confirmed, blocked and tagged. I've also semi-protected the article for a month. If the IP continues to be disruptive, please let me know (you can do it on my Talk page or here if this hasn't been archived). Closing.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 16:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC) reply

29 December 2016

Suspected sockpuppets


BlooandMacFoster was seen re-adding the hoax content inserted by Ljlas20 and his socks on the List of programs previously broadcast by Radio Philippines Network article. (See edits from Ljlas20, Liezandro02, and BlooandMacFoster from the said article). - WayKurat ( talk) 02:05, 29 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk - Please, compare to previous socks. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:33, 2 January 2017 (UTC) reply
  •  Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 01:21, 2 January 2017 (UTC) reply

12 January 2017

Suspected sockpuppets


DextersLaboratoryCN was seen re-adding the hoax content inserted by Ljlas20 and his socks on the List of programs previously broadcast by Radio Philippines Network article. (See edits from Ljlas20, Liezandro02, BlooandMacFoster and DextersLaboratoryCN from the said article). FYI. UEFA matches and World Series games were not aired in the Philippines until the 2000s. - WayKurat ( talk) 07:11, 12 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Adding User:RegularShowCN in SPI. This user re-added the same content added by the socks above. See latest edit for evidence. - WayKurat ( talk) 08:53, 12 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Accounts now blocked. Closing. Bbb23 ( talk) 14:48, 12 January 2017 (UTC) reply

19 February 2017

Suspected sockpuppets


Same account naming pattern with the previously blocked socks of Ljlas20 (Carton Network shows + CN). Also, the new sock was seen re-adding the same content added previously by User:BlooandMacFoster on the Template:Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation template. (see https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Template%3AIntercontinental_Broadcasting_Corporation&type=revision&diff=755710877&oldid=747746483 1], 2 for evidence). - WayKurat ( talk) 08:55, 19 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

20 March 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Seems likely to be a duck based on username and redirects to favorite articles of this sock. (PPGCN = PowerpuffGirlsCN) CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:04, 20 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • Any actions from admins? I think this sock is already blocked yesterday. - WayKurat ( talk) 08:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Already blocked by Ad Orientem. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 21:50, 28 March 2017 (UTC) reply

06 April 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Username quacking + contrib quacking CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:27, 6 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Blocked and tagged. GAB gab 14:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC) GAB gab 14:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC) reply

20 May 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK -- LG-Gunther :  Talk  00:39, 20 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Additional information needed - @ LG-Gunther: In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:40, 28 May 2017 (UTC) reply
  • No response in 8 days and the IP is not active any more. Case closed. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:55, 5 June 2017 (UTC) reply

31 August 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK This is another Sock of User:Ljlas20 is User:RegularShowCN1 these are same username of Cartoon Network Shows as Regular Show and CN1 means Cartoon Network1 as Vandalism and hoaxes has same as evidence forgot obvious sock of User:Ljlas20 sock LG-Gunther :  Talk  22:54, 31 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Certainly matches all his usual patterns of behavior. -- Orange Mike | Talk 00:26, 1 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Sro23 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

15 October 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

  Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me This is Sock of User:Ljlas20 is User:RegularShowCN2 has another username violation. User:RegularShowCN2 as Violated same username of Cartoon Network Shows as Regular Show and CN2 Created Sock again of User:Ljlas20 is User:RegularShowCN2 as created same as User:Ljlas20 Sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  01:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Additional information needed. In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:

  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. - ~ Rob13 Talk 02:18, 15 October 2017 (UTC) reply

17 October 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK Same as Sock of User:Ljlas20 LG-Gunther :  Talk  05:04, 17 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

To further strengthen this SPI regarding Ljlas20 mentioned socks. I already request a CU for Ljlas20 sock he vandalizing CNN Philippines News and Current Affairs. Pinging WayKurat and Oripaypaykim. -- 99.109.85.105 ( talk) 19:36, 28 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Account is blocked and I don't see the need for CU at this time. Closing. Sro23 ( talk) 01:55, 31 October 2017 (UTC) reply

17 November 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Hirolovesswords ( talk) 08:18, 17 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

The user account Zoebryce had been globally locked, I checked on the CA records, this user was blocked at ceb.wikipedia as "sockpuppet of LTA 2toy mora" summary, the other account 2toy mora was also blocked at ceb.wikipedia as "sockpuppet of LTA 2toy mora/Bertrand101" summary. If it is not wrong, this case maybe related to Bertrand101. SA 13 Bro ( talk) 16:19, 17 November 2017 (UTC) reply
Add 49.146.43.82 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) as a sockpuppet of Zoebryce2 also: [1] only 3 days after being blocked as User:Zoebryce2 for adding almost the same categories to the same article. (Should I have added that to the list above? I didn't because I don't know how far along the investigation is.) -- Closeapple ( talk) 16:24, 23 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Sir Sputnik as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

29 November 2017

Suspected sockpuppets 

Hirolovesswords (
talk) 13:03, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Additional information needed - In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:33, 29 November 2017 (UTC) reply
  • IP blocked now. Closing. Sro23 ( talk) 04:02, 4 December 2017 (UTC) reply

09 December 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK looks like as sock of User:Ljlas20, but behavior previously of User:EliasMint5301 as sockpuppetry again same as User:Ljlas20. LG-Gunther :  Talk  06:48, 9 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Let me strengthen this SPI for Ljlas20. I've requested an CheckUser to check any edits for the vandal's behavior. Let see any diffs here. 99.109.85.105 ( talk) 17:42, 10 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Additional information needed - In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. ~ Rob13 Talk 23:12, 10 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • No diffs provided. Closing.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 01:53, 20 December 2017 (UTC) reply

19 December 2017

Suspected sockpuppets


The username is the evidence itself apart from the editing behavior. Please note that Ljlas have two blocked sockpuppets with a similar name: User:RegularShowCN1 and User:RegularShowCN2. - WayKurat ( talk) 02:46, 19 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Now blocked. Closing. Sro23 ( talk) 07:39, 19 December 2017 (UTC) reply

27 December 2017

Suspected sockpuppets


The new username is the evidence itself. Ljlas created a new username very similar to the three blocked socks he created: User:RegularShowCN1, User:RegularShowCN2 and User:RegularShowCN22. - WayKurat ( talk) 01:24, 27 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

07 January 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


The username is the evidence itself. Ljlas20 usually creates new sock accounts by combining a Cartoon Network show and adding a "CN" suffix at the end. - WayKurat ( talk) 05:08, 7 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

09 January 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


The username is the evidence itself. Username is similar to the most recently blocked Ljlas20 sock: User:FlapJackCN. - WayKurat ( talk) 13:37, 9 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Sir Sputnik as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

11 January 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Several IPs in a similar range were blocked last November. They had a pattern of doing work related to television/radio stations and sports announcers, including a habit of adding (unsourced) announcers to the infoboxes of National Basketball Association team season articles. Examples of the previous IPs' work can be seen here, here, here, and here. These IPs have jumped in over the past couple of days, making edits like this, this, this, and this. These edits bear a strong resemblance to those performed by the previously blocked 49.146.XX IPs. Giants2008 ( Talk) 23:31, 11 January 2018 (UTC) Giants2008 ( Talk) 23:31, 11 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

I smell a range block. Let's close this--thank you, Giants. Drmies ( talk) 03:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply

17 April 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

  Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me The another username is the evidence itself. Username is similar to the Cartoon Network Shows most recently Notorious blocked Ljlas20 sock: User:Flapjack03, User:Flapjack02 and User:Flapjack01. LG-Gunther :  Talk  10:34, 17 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


18 April 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK - Same as Another Notorious Sock of User:Ljlas20 forget those Username of this similar to Cartoon Network Shows again. LG-Gunther :  Talk  22:02, 18 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

CU confirms that 02, 03, and 2 are identical. Drmies ( talk) 02:08, 19 April 2018 (UTC) reply

12 May 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

  Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me LG-Gunther :  Talk  05:36, 12 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

16 May 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

  Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me Same as Sock of User:Ljlas20 is User:JulieAnneRPNBeaGMA for Vandalism on Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation LG-Gunther :  Talk  13:25, 16 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

03 June 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

  Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me This is Notorious Sock of User:Ljlas20 is User:SamuraiJackCN as same as links of TV shows of Cartoon Network links to Users as Sock of Ljlas20 LG-Gunther :  Talk  14:26, 3 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Account now blocked. Closing. Sro23 ( talk) 00:27, 7 June 2018 (UTC) reply

16 June 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

New sock has the same naming convention on other recently blocked socks of Ljlas20 (adding -CN at the end of the username that usually is a show in Cartoon Network). Also, I have listed the IP address 49.146.37.33 for sockpuppetry. The IP keeps on adding the category "Radio Philippines Network personalities" on the Julie Ann San Jose article, even if the said artist did not become part of the network. JohnnyBravoCN re-added that category to the said article after reverting the edits of the IP vandal twice. See 1 and 2 for behavioral evidence. - WayKurat ( talk) 07:46, 16 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 18:55, 21 June 2018 (UTC) reply


21 June 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

  Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me LG-Gunther :  Talk  10:20, 21 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 18:55, 21 June 2018 (UTC) reply

09 August 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


Any concern about the use of showCN because he still using about the Cartoon Network show usernames starting with showCN? I would ask Blakegripling ph about Ljlas20 quack. 2600:6C4E:580:46B:0:E653:2549:B879 ( talk) 04:24, 9 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk - There isn't a whole to go on here, but what little there is definitely points towards sockpuppetry. Please check to confirm. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 20:29, 9 August 2018 (UTC) reply
  •  Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 21:47, 9 August 2018 (UTC) reply

20 August 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


New Ljlas20 sockpuppet appeared. Name is very similar compared with the most recently blocked sockpuppet ( User:JuniperLeeCN). - WayKurat ( talk) 14:39, 20 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Admins, please check this SPI. The sockpuppet is still active. - WayKurat ( talk) 05:33, 24 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Pink clock Awaiting administrative action - Given the username, this looks pretty clear cut to me. Please block the new sock indefinitely. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 21:18, 27 August 2018 (UTC) reply
  •   Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me,  Blocked and tagged. GAB gab 01:25, 28 August 2018 (UTC) reply

22 October 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK, Same as Long term Notorious Sock of User:Ljlas20, See [10], [11], [12] LG-Gunther :  Talk  08:09, 22 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

@ LG-Gunther: Please do not request a CU automatically every time you file a report. A CU request requires an explanation as to why it is needed. Generally, if your claim is that the new account is obvious, a CU would only be appropriate if there is a history of finding other accounts, which there is not. CU declined.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 14:37, 22 October 2018 (UTC) reply

  • Blocked and tagged the account. Blocking individual IP's isn't going to accomplish much here. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 03:38, 25 October 2018 (UTC) reply

02 December 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


The username is the evidence itself. Very similar behavior and username compared to blocked sockpuppet User:JuniperLeeCN1. - WayKurat ( talk) 12:57, 2 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • No doubt. Blocked and tagged. Case closed. Courcelles ( talk) 20:05, 2 December 2018 (UTC) reply

15 February 2019

Suspected sockpuppets


The username is the evidence itself. It follows the pattern of Ljlas20's older sockpuppet accounts. Also, the new sock account edits the same articles as what the recently blocked socks were editing as well. - WayKurat ( talk) 17:29, 15 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Blocked and tagged. But it would help if next time more diffs were included instead of just saying that everything is obvious. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 06:25, 16 February 2019 (UTC) reply

01 April 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK per username, maybe a continuation of blocked user User:Liezandro03. The IP address and the new sock account was seen editing the Radio Philippines Network article, similar on the previously blocked socks were done. See 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 for behavioral evidence. - WayKurat ( talk) 09:27, 1 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

19 May 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK, same as Notorious sock of User:Ljlas20. LG-Gunther :  Talk  07:45, 19 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Pink clock Awaiting administrative action -   Looks like a duck to me, but you might want to include diffs next time if you are saying it is obvious. qedk ( t 桜 c) 10:26, 19 May 2019 (UTC) reply
  • It's been a while since the last check, so I ran one. Both accounts  Confirmed,  Blocked and tagged. — DoRD ( talk)​ 14:53, 19 May 2019 (UTC) reply

27 August 2019

Suspected sockpuppets


The username is the evidence itself. The new sock account follows the name trend of blocked Ljlas20 socks. The latest blocked sock is User:Liezandro05. - WayKurat ( talk) 01:10, 27 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

17 September 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK on List of Radio Philippines Network affiliate stations and Template:Communications Group-Philippines article as Long-term abuse IP Sock of User:Ljlas20, see as evidence: [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21]. LG-Gunther :  Talk  02:33, 17 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • One IP is already blocked, the other is probably inactive. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 00:59, 20 September 2019 (UTC) reply

02 October 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

The username is the evidence itself. The most recently blocked sock for Ljlas20 is User:Liezandro06. The IP address also had the similar editing behavior of Ljlas20: editing the Radio Philippines Network and Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation related articles and adding hoax information on them. See 1, 2 for evidence. - WayKurat ( talk) 01:19, 2 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Account  Blocked and tagged. A range block isn't possible here without significant collateral damage. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 01:58, 2 October 2019 (UTC) reply

30 January 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

  Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me on Template:Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation, behaviour evidence like Vandalism as sock of User:Ljlas20 LG-Gunther :  Talk  00:09, 30 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

06 December 2020

Suspected sockpuppets


Both accounts are mostly editing or creating new articles involving Radio Philippines Network and/or Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation, similar on what Ljlas20 or the confirmed socks are doing before getting blocked. Also, both accounts follow a pattern: the names are based on the protagonists of the Grand Theft Auto series. - WayKurat ( talk) 15:28, 6 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Adding IP address 49.145.233.205 in this SPI. Seems that this IP reverts back any edits of the users mentioned above. - WayKurat ( talk) 05:59, 13 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Unsurprisingly, the two registered accounts are  Confirmed to each other.  Blocked and tagged as suspected socks. no No comment with respect to IP address(es). NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 01:31, 15 December 2020 (UTC) reply

27 December 2020

Suspected sockpuppets


Too obvious that this is a new Ljlas20 sock. This time, he's using one of the protagonist names in Grand Theft Auto 5. Previously blocked socks were named after the protagonists of GTA III and GTA San Andreas. WayKurat ( talk) 03:41, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

01 January 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Same account naming pattern with the previously blocked socks of Ljlas20, which is from Grand Theft Auto: Vice City. Chompy Ace 05:42, 1 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

02 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


Similar edits. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:13, 2 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

27 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


WP:DUCK per last blocked username ( User:Lazlow GTA III) and the current sockmaster's "trend" of basing their usernames on the Grand Theft Auto series. Please check for any sleepers. - WayKurat ( talk) 02:55, 27 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • DUCK socks don't need checkuser, and an admin can block based off of behavioral evidence. Declining CU... ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC) reply
  •  Blocked and tagged, closing. Mz7 ( talk) 05:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC) reply

11 June 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


WP:DUCK based from the username pattern and editing behavior. Previously blocked socks were named after the characters of the Grand Theft Auto series, plus the game title itself. Examples: User:Claude GTA III, User:Tommy GTA VC, and User:Sonny GTA VC. - WayKurat ( talk) 06:40, 11 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

03 September 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

IP was seen editing the same articles that the sockpuppets have been editing ( Radio Philippines Network related articles). The new sock account reverted back the IP's edits. Also, the new account has the similar naming pattern compared with previously blocked sock accounts which are named after Grand Theft Auto series characters and the game in the series that the character appeared (samples: User:De Santa GTA V, User:Lazlow GTA III and User:Sonny GTA VC). - WayKurat ( talk) 01:37, 3 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • blocked and tagged CiprianiGTAIII. The IP looks dynamic, so not going to bother with that. Threw some semi-protection around. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:50, 24 September 2021 (UTC) reply

14 October 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Sockpuppet is adding hoaxes on radio station articles and disrupts Philippine related articles. Username WP:DUCK. SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 13:13, 14 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • SeanJ 2007 reverting all the edits of the suspected sockpuppet, but the sockpuppetry is not confirmed yet, the reporter also didn't provide any evidence that the suspected user is a sockpuppet. Any admins here can take action on this case? Ctrlwiki ( talk) 05:43, 25 October 2021 (UTC) reply
  • @ Tamzin: The sock is repeatedly doing the same as the previous sock accounts that is editing Radio Philippines Network related articles, see Special:Diff/1049860979, Special:Diff/1049861048 and Special:Diff/1049861241. The sock also disrupts Philippine related articles, see Special:Diff/1051581302, Special:Diff/1050677578 and others (just check the targets contributions and some of these are the same as the previous). The edits may not be the same of the previous socks (for some edits) but has disrupted the same articles (some has different edits like Radio Philippines Network related articles). SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 06:25, 25 October 2021 (UTC) reply
  • @ Tamzin: I will just mention WayKurat about that, because he often caught the socks edits that is similar to Ljlas20. Maybe he can explain it more clearer why. SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 07:24, 25 October 2021 (UTC) reply
  • @ WayKurat: We need your comment about here to clearly prove that Liberty1892 is a sockpuppet of Ljlas20. SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 01:58, 26 October 2021 (UTC) reply
    • Okay, I'm gonna reply on this SPI once. Liberty1892 is not an Ljlas20 sockpuppet. Based from the user's behavior in the past days, this user showed a different editing behavior compared to Ljlas20. I may have mistaken to tag the said user as an Ljlas20 sock in their talk page, since the user's account name may be based from Grand Theft Auto's Liberty City. There is a common pattern on Ljlas20 sockpuppets that uses names in the Grand Theft Auto series. I might be able to remove the tag before SeanJ created this SPI.
    • Based from my previous encounters with SeanJ (AKA User:Sean Ethan James D. Querubin), this user have made a lot of rash decisions lately: moving old articles to draftspace without even consulting the original author, requesting protection removal on an article that was protected for years due to a longterm vandal, because he believes that the vandalism is long been gone (not realizing that the protection itself is the reason why the vandalism lessened. Thanks Sean, the vandal returned on their shenanigans right after your request has been granted). Now, he created this SPI and keeps on nagging me on finding any evidence.
    • The concerns I raised may sound for an WP:ANI against SeanJ but I'll save it for another time. Right now, I apologize for tagging this user as a Ljlas20 sockpuppet. - WayKurat ( talk) 15:55, 27 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Tamzin as part of their training as a clerk. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference. You may pose any questions or concerns either on their talk page or on this page.

  • @ SeanJ 2007:  Additional information needed. In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this.
  • Also why is this username DUCKy? -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 05:42, 25 October 2021 (UTC) reply
  • @ Ctrlwiki: While normally one should not revert a sock's edits before they've been blocked, sometimes people (myself included) do do it if it's particularly obvious. It seems from Sean's filing that he feels that this case is obvious, so I'm going to assume good faith that he's just failed to supply the needed diffs. If we wind up determining that Liberty1982 isn't a sock, then we'll review things.
    More broadly, I see that you're coming into conflict with Sean in a lot of places. Showing up at an SPI like this to complain about him could be seen as WP:HOUNDING. If you have concerns about his editing overall, you would be better off going to WP:ANI or contacting an administrator. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 06:24, 25 October 2021 (UTC) reply
  • @ SeanJ 2007: Thank you. Could you please link some diffs from Ljlas20 or past confirmed/proven sox that are similar in nature? They don't have to be the exact same thing, just similar in some way that is unlikely to be coincidence. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 06:35, 25 October 2021 (UTC) reply
  • @ SeanJ 2007: You've already pinged WayKurat once. Since they've continued to edit, I think it's safe to assume that they're either already preparing a reply, or not interested in replying. There's no need to ping them again. (If you're worried that they didn't get your first ping, turn on "Failed mention" and "successful mention" in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-echo.)
    I'm going to leave this open a few more days, for you to gether more evidence, and for WayKurat to show up if they'd like to. (They're under no obligation.) In the future, please keep in mind the header at WP:SPI: Evidence is required. When you open the investigation, you must immediately provide evidence that the suspected sock puppets are connected. The evidence will need to include diffs of edits that suggest the accounts are connected. It's entirely possible that you're right here, but it's not so obvious that I can see it just from checking recent contributions. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 16:34, 26 October 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Closing without action, with prejudice.
    @ WayKurat: Thank you for your comments clarifying what happened, and for acknowledging responsibility for your mistake. If you want to apologize, though, it's better that you apologize to Liberty than apologize here. Just so you know, only clerks and admins should really be tagging users as sox. The documentation at {{ sock}} is rather out-of-date on this, and some other clerks/CUs and I have been working on overhauling that series of templates to make it clearer that that's not how they're meant to be used, so it's not your fault; but just for future reference.
    @ SeanJ 2007: In the future, please do not file SPIs if you don't have evidence of sockpuppetry. Also, please do not try to intimidate people by pointing to the existence of an SPI, after it's already been established that you don't have any evidence. You may consider this an informal warning (more for the intimidation than the filing). Now please go revert all of your reverts of their edits—or, if you stand by the revert for another reason, make a dummy edit explaining the reason. (That's not an "order" as a clerk, but me saying as a fellow Wikipedian that that's what's expected when an editor makes a mistake like this.) -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 18:33, 27 October 2021 (UTC) reply

15 March 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Recreation of Draft:News Update (RPN). Other edits look similar. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 11:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

I ran a check on the account. Case is  Stale, but comparing results to CU log data says this account could be a sock.  Behavioural evidence needs evaluation. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 11:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply

13 November 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK per behavioral evidence and username. Recreated an article that was previously made by several IP socks as a redirect (see edit history of News Update (RPN) and its public log. Both sock accounts were also caught editing the List of programs previously broadcast by Radio Philippines Network article, the other sock even moved it to a new title.

Please note that Ljlas20 uses Cartoon Network characters as their sockpuppet usernames. See User:Dexterdeedee1, User:JuniperLeeCN2 and User:PPGCartoonNetwork. Please check if there are also sleepers. - WayKurat ( talk) 09:46, 13 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Clerk endorsed - Please, compare to each other. Vanjagenije (talk) 16:40, 15 November 2023 (UTC) reply
  •  Blocked without tags. One I'm comfortable saying is  Confirmed based on technical data and one I'd say is  Likely based on technical data, plus behavior for both. Izno ( talk) 23:17, 16 November 2023 (UTC) reply

25 November 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK per username. Last blocked sock is named Ben10xSamuraiJack. - WayKurat ( talk) 01:58, 25 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 ( talk) 14:08, 25 November 2023 (UTC) reply

10 January 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK LTA Sock of User:Ljlas20, sames as Cartoon Network Shows Usernames. LG-Gunther :  Talk  05:37, 10 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Blocked and tagged. I see no reason to run a check, and the filer has not provided one. Closing. Bbb23 ( talk) 14:18, 10 January 2024 (UTC) reply

17 April 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK per username. Username has a similar naming pattern compared to the most recently blocked socks: User:TheSecretSaturdayxBen10 and User:Ben10xSamuraiJack2. Behavior-wise, the new sock has been editing mostly Philippine TV articles, same with other socks. - WayKurat ( talk) 01:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC) WayKurat ( talk) 01:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Ljlas20/Archive&oldid=1223037547"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE