User:Kurdiyate352 was blocked as a result of this ANI report on July 3. User:Cityaram365 began editing on July 7 and immediately returned to one of Kurdiyate352's disputes with User:Semsûrî at Kifri. Both Kurdiyate352 and Cityaram365 are preoccupied with populations in several Iraqi towns. In addition to the similar username formats, here are some specific edits connecting these two accounts:
Because Kurdiyate352's first edits were to their User, User Talk, and Sandbox pages, I suspect that account was also created to circumvent a block, so I'm requesting that a CheckUser look for previous accounts. Woodroar ( talk) 00:18, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
That account is not me. I made some simple fixes to articles and these changes were completely valid and not reverted. If there are any edits you genuinely don't agree with you can undo them with justification. Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cityaram365 ( talk • contribs) 17:19, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
CheckUser Confirmed following an edit warring report on
WP:ANEW.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs) 07:35, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
CheckUser Confirmed.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs) 06:03, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
He reverts all pages his edits back to his last sock User:BurrritoTattoo like this, [ [1]] [ [2]] and [ [3]] [ [4]] Shadow4dark ( talk) 01:49, 12 January 2021 (UTC) And he editing same page as his older sock User:3Oh Hexelon https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Kifri_District,_Diyala_Governorate&action=history Shadow4dark ( talk) 02:57, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The account AwaZorroAp was created and four minutes later requested a semi protected edit to remove specific information on page Altun Kupri [5] that previous sockpuppets of Kurdiyate352 had disagreed with and edit warred over, like 68.AleemcaseyToby [6] [7] [8] , Talkativeness [9] [10] [11]. 3Oh Hexelon and Abodiyar were other Kurdiyate352 sockpuppets who tried to remove information on the page related to Kurds [12] [13]. User كركوك عراقي and ip 5.25.166.255 are other accounts that have tried to remove the information as well [14] [15] [16], and have similar interests to the other Kurdiyate352 sockpuppets in the vein of Iraqi-Turkmen and Kurdish articles [17] [18]. They were also both only active for the same short period of time, كركوك عراقي from March 7-17 and 5.25.166.255 from March 11-13. Sorry if I messed something up, this is my first time filing a Sockpuppet investigation thing. Ericfood ( talk | contribs) 16:25, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Pro forma. GeneralNotability ( talk) 18:32, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I suspect this is a sock of 3Oh Hexelon for two reasons. One is pattern since it's the same articles that are being disrupted. Secondly, its the same type of anti-Kurdish POV-push (which clearly comes to show here with the removal of 'Kurdish principality' [19]
I would argue that showing page history is better as evidence (than diffs) since it'll give the clerk a clearer sense of my suspicion. Here are the main articles that both 3Oh Hexelon and WakaWakaQdh have edited:
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
An empty claim with no real evidence to support it. You're the one with a pro-Kurdish POV push, and this is clear in your edits. I have merely reinstated sourced information about Iraqi, Arab and Turkmen settlements which you removed for blatantly obvious racial reasons to propagate a Kurdish agenda. I have no relation to the other user in question, and all my edits are carried out with dignity in an attempt to make the articles fair and based on unbiased sources, which is obviously the opposite of whatever you are doing. WakaWakaQdh ( talk) 17:35, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Same articles of interest. I believe strongly that this is a sockpuppet of Kurdiyate352 because of one very specific behaviour being the desire to move information about the historic Kurdish presence from the introduction of of an article to its history section. See [31] compared to the fourth section under 3 January 2022. Semsûrî ( talk) 22:40, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Not true. I have only been aware of the article you are referring to ( Sadiyah) today as it was subject to disruptive editing. There was a clause in the introduction which clearly referred to the political history of the city, and I believed that a statement concerning the history of the city would surely be more appropriate in the history section. Dwasirkaram ( talk) 23:04, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Same content in the same articles that are being disrupted [32] [33] Semsûrî ( talk) 10:45, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Apart from editing the same range of topics and even the same articles, they somehow manage to find a thread among countless others on Talk:Kirkuk posted by a blocked sock, House of tabooleh, and agree with them completely. They happen to be edit-warring on Sulaiman Bek, an article that was previously subject to edit-warring with regard to the same POV by various IPs and globally locked accounts. On Al-Bayati, shortly after an IP restores House of Tabooleh's reverted insertions, Mteiritay "expands" article a few days later in the very same manner as the IP with OR or poor sources. Aintabli ( talk) 18:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Kurdiyate352 was blocked as a result of this ANI report on July 3. User:Cityaram365 began editing on July 7 and immediately returned to one of Kurdiyate352's disputes with User:Semsûrî at Kifri. Both Kurdiyate352 and Cityaram365 are preoccupied with populations in several Iraqi towns. In addition to the similar username formats, here are some specific edits connecting these two accounts:
Because Kurdiyate352's first edits were to their User, User Talk, and Sandbox pages, I suspect that account was also created to circumvent a block, so I'm requesting that a CheckUser look for previous accounts. Woodroar ( talk) 00:18, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
That account is not me. I made some simple fixes to articles and these changes were completely valid and not reverted. If there are any edits you genuinely don't agree with you can undo them with justification. Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cityaram365 ( talk • contribs) 17:19, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
CheckUser Confirmed following an edit warring report on
WP:ANEW.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs) 07:35, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
CheckUser Confirmed.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs) 06:03, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
He reverts all pages his edits back to his last sock User:BurrritoTattoo like this, [ [1]] [ [2]] and [ [3]] [ [4]] Shadow4dark ( talk) 01:49, 12 January 2021 (UTC) And he editing same page as his older sock User:3Oh Hexelon https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Kifri_District,_Diyala_Governorate&action=history Shadow4dark ( talk) 02:57, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The account AwaZorroAp was created and four minutes later requested a semi protected edit to remove specific information on page Altun Kupri [5] that previous sockpuppets of Kurdiyate352 had disagreed with and edit warred over, like 68.AleemcaseyToby [6] [7] [8] , Talkativeness [9] [10] [11]. 3Oh Hexelon and Abodiyar were other Kurdiyate352 sockpuppets who tried to remove information on the page related to Kurds [12] [13]. User كركوك عراقي and ip 5.25.166.255 are other accounts that have tried to remove the information as well [14] [15] [16], and have similar interests to the other Kurdiyate352 sockpuppets in the vein of Iraqi-Turkmen and Kurdish articles [17] [18]. They were also both only active for the same short period of time, كركوك عراقي from March 7-17 and 5.25.166.255 from March 11-13. Sorry if I messed something up, this is my first time filing a Sockpuppet investigation thing. Ericfood ( talk | contribs) 16:25, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Pro forma. GeneralNotability ( talk) 18:32, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I suspect this is a sock of 3Oh Hexelon for two reasons. One is pattern since it's the same articles that are being disrupted. Secondly, its the same type of anti-Kurdish POV-push (which clearly comes to show here with the removal of 'Kurdish principality' [19]
I would argue that showing page history is better as evidence (than diffs) since it'll give the clerk a clearer sense of my suspicion. Here are the main articles that both 3Oh Hexelon and WakaWakaQdh have edited:
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
An empty claim with no real evidence to support it. You're the one with a pro-Kurdish POV push, and this is clear in your edits. I have merely reinstated sourced information about Iraqi, Arab and Turkmen settlements which you removed for blatantly obvious racial reasons to propagate a Kurdish agenda. I have no relation to the other user in question, and all my edits are carried out with dignity in an attempt to make the articles fair and based on unbiased sources, which is obviously the opposite of whatever you are doing. WakaWakaQdh ( talk) 17:35, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Same articles of interest. I believe strongly that this is a sockpuppet of Kurdiyate352 because of one very specific behaviour being the desire to move information about the historic Kurdish presence from the introduction of of an article to its history section. See [31] compared to the fourth section under 3 January 2022. Semsûrî ( talk) 22:40, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Not true. I have only been aware of the article you are referring to ( Sadiyah) today as it was subject to disruptive editing. There was a clause in the introduction which clearly referred to the political history of the city, and I believed that a statement concerning the history of the city would surely be more appropriate in the history section. Dwasirkaram ( talk) 23:04, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Same content in the same articles that are being disrupted [32] [33] Semsûrî ( talk) 10:45, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Apart from editing the same range of topics and even the same articles, they somehow manage to find a thread among countless others on Talk:Kirkuk posted by a blocked sock, House of tabooleh, and agree with them completely. They happen to be edit-warring on Sulaiman Bek, an article that was previously subject to edit-warring with regard to the same POV by various IPs and globally locked accounts. On Al-Bayati, shortly after an IP restores House of Tabooleh's reverted insertions, Mteiritay "expands" article a few days later in the very same manner as the IP with OR or poor sources. Aintabli ( talk) 18:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)