Juliett Tango Papa ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

30 October 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

• Rainbow freedom ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) (  Clerk note: original case name)

• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Rainbow freedom has been blocked for sockpuppetry. Single-purpose accounts active on the same page with the corresponding comments:

• Rainbow freedom --> "This is ugly deadnaming..." [1], [2], [3](see edits summary for the last diff)

• Juliett Tango Papa --> "This ugly deadnaming needs to stop." [4]

Separate note - both accounts are most likely using proxies and are related to the different report I'm still working on, and I'll be filing at some point soon. GizzyCatBella 🍁 21:06, 30 October 2020 (UTC) (Juliett Tango Papa opened an account in April 2020 [5], so they would be a sock master for this case.) reply

Additional Note:

• @ User:Guerillero and Administrative Team. To give you a heads up. The above accounts are most likely (I'm sure about that) connected to all other new accounts that followed and harassed me since this case's conclusion. [6]. They arrive shortly at the articles that I have edited earlier to revert my edit or challenge me on talk pages. That is how Rainbow freedom ended up on the Margot article, not to edit the article constructively but for the sole purpose of reverting me. [7] Prior harassers include this new account [8], this one [9], this one [10], this one [11], this one [12], this one [13] this one [14], this one [15], this one [16], this one [17], this one [18], this one [19] etc. They even impersonate me registering fake SPI reports. That just happened on October 22 under [20], but since then, that fake report has been deleted, and I can't provide a proper diff anymore. I think you can view it in your administrative records. Sometimes they purposely enter WW2 Poland related information [21] understanding that I'm Topic Banned from that area. [22]

All the above examples are from the last 2-3 months only but this is going on for a lengthier time than that, with greater or lesser frequency, and it all started shortly after Icewhiz has been banned. I summarized the latest occurences briefly here already [23]. If you were to check these accounts, they are %100 using a series of proxies/VPNs as recently blocked accounts. First, I assumed that all of them are connected to this [24]. However, after further extensive research, I concluded that there is more than one character associated with this harassment procedure. If you wish me to advance pieces of evidence here, I can do that; if not, please allow me some time to file a separate proper report soon. - GizzyCatBella 🍁 03:00, 31 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• Juliett Tango Papa set of my sock alert when I first came across Margot (activist) at AE. Looking at the CU data, it looks like they are using a series of proxies/VPNs. Blocking seems reasonable due to the linguistic overlap and SPA nature of Juliett Tango Papa -- Guerillero | Parlez Moi 22:32, 30 October 2020 (UTC) reply

• Both users are blocked, check already ran, closing. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 01:03, 4 November 2020 (UTC) reply
•  Clerk note: Adding tags -- RoySmith (talk) 14:21, 4 November 2020 (UTC) reply